Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-78
AllowedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component.
8340 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2025-13687 (GCVE-0-2025-13687)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-03 20:45 – Updated: 2026-03-03 21:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data is vulnerable to arbitrary code injection due to runtime environment
Summary
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the user-defined function component.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7262347 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data |
Affected:
5.1.2 , ≤ 5.3.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13687",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T21:31:18.455608Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T21:31:25.924Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the user-defined function component.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the user-defined function component."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T20:45:55.395Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7262347"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading. Product(s) Version(s) number and/or range Remediation/Fix/Instructions DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 - 5.3.0 Upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading. Product(s) Version(s) number and/or range Remediation/Fix/Instructions DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 - 5.3.0 Upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later"
}
],
"title": "DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data is vulnerable to arbitrary code injection due to runtime environment",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ibm-cvegen"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13687",
"datePublished": "2026-03-03T20:45:55.395Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-25T20:00:32.872Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T21:31:25.924Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-13686 (GCVE-0-2025-13686)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-03 20:51 – Updated: 2026-03-03 21:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data is vulnerable to arbitrary code injection due to runtime environment
Summary
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the job subroutine component.
Severity
6.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7262347 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data |
Affected:
5.1.2 , ≤ 5.3.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13686",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T21:31:50.620127Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T21:31:57.708Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data:5.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "5.3.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "5.1.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the job subroutine component.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 through 5.3.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input through the job subroutine component."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T20:51:45.521Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7262347"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading. Product(s) Version(s) number and/or range Remediation/Fix/Instructions DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 - 5.3.0 Upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading. Product(s) Version(s) number and/or range Remediation/Fix/Instructions DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.1.2 - 5.3.0 Upgrade to version 5.3.1 or later"
}
],
"title": "DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data is vulnerable to arbitrary code injection due to runtime environment",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ibm-cvegen"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13686",
"datePublished": "2026-03-03T20:51:45.521Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-25T19:54:37.040Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T21:31:57.708Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-13605 (GCVE-0-2025-13605)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-04 14:52 – Updated: 2026-05-04 15:28
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Shell command injection in 3onedata GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P modbus gateway
Summary
3onedata modbus gateway device model GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P (hardware version V2.2.0) allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the root user by providing payload in the "IP address" field of the diagnosis test tools.
This issue has been resolved in firmware version 3.0.59B2024080600R4353
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/05/CVE-2025-13605 | third-party-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3onedata | GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P |
Affected:
0 , < 3.0.59B2024080600R4353
(custom)
|
Date Public
2026-05-04 14:50
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13605",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-04T15:28:34.977201Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-04T15:28:56.851Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P",
"vendor": "3onedata",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.59B2024080600R4353",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jaros\u0142aw Wawi\u00f3rko"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "\u0141ukasz Rybak"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-04T14:50:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "3onedata modbus gateway device model\u0026nbsp;GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P (hardware version V2.2.0)\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eallows authenticated users to execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the root user by providing payload in the \"IP address\" field of the diagnosis test tools.\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/span\u003eThis issue has been resolved in firmware version 3.0.59B2024080600R4353"
}
],
"value": "3onedata modbus gateway device model\u00a0GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P (hardware version V2.2.0)\u00a0allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary shell commands in the context of the root user by providing payload in the \"IP address\" field of the diagnosis test tools.\nThis issue has been resolved in firmware version 3.0.59B2024080600R4353"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-04T14:52:39.300Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/05/CVE-2025-13605"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Shell command injection in 3onedata GW1101-1D(RS-485)-TB-P modbus gateway",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13605",
"datePublished": "2026-05-04T14:52:39.300Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-24T14:44:56.542Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-04T15:28:56.851Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-13481 (GCVE-0-2025-13481)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-11 19:47 – Updated: 2025-12-11 20:34
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
IBM Aspera Orchestrator Command Injection
Summary
IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.0 through 4.1.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7254434 | vendor-advisorypatch |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Aspera Orchestrator |
Affected:
4.0.0 , ≤ 4.1.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aspera_orchestrator:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aspera_orchestrator:4.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13481",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-11T20:28:34.836320Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-11T20:34:53.985Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aspera_orchestrator:4.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe:2.3:a:ibm:aspera_orchestrator:4.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"product": "Aspera Orchestrator",
"vendor": "IBM",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.0 through 4.1.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.0 through 4.1.0 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-11T19:47:10.233Z",
"orgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"shortName": "ibm"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7254434"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eRemediation/Fixes IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading: Product Version Platform Link to Fix IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.1.1 Linux click here\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Remediation/Fixes IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading: Product Version Platform Link to Fix IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.1.1 Linux click here"
}
],
"title": "IBM Aspera Orchestrator Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "ibm-cvegen"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9a959283-ebb5-44b6-b705-dcc2bbced522",
"assignerShortName": "ibm",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13481",
"datePublished": "2025-12-11T19:47:10.233Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-20T15:07:48.479Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-11T20:34:53.985Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-13284 (GCVE-0-2025-13284)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-17 03:37 – Updated: 2025-11-27 02:48
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
ThinPLUS｜ThinPLUS - OS Command Injection
Summary
ThinPLUS developed by ThinPLUS has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server.
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10512-e196b-1.html | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10513-0d82b-2.html | third-party-advisory |
Date Public
2025-11-17 03:35
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13284",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-17T17:53:52.125212Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-17T17:57:06.866Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "ThinPLUS",
"vendor": "ThinPLUS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "TPmCloud4.0"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-11-17T03:35:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "ThinPLUS developed by ThinPLUS has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"value": "ThinPLUS developed by ThinPLUS has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-88",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-88 OS Command Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-27T02:48:22.286Z",
"orgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"shortName": "twcert"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10512-e196b-1.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10513-0d82b-2.html"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Please update to version\u0026nbsp;TPmCloud4.2 or later.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Please update to version\u00a0TPmCloud4.2 or later."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "TVN-202511010",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "ThinPLUS\uff5cThinPLUS - OS Command Injection",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "cded6c7f-6ce5-4948-8f87-aa7a3bbb6b0e",
"assignerShortName": "twcert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13284",
"datePublished": "2025-11-17T03:37:15.767Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-17T02:58:22.253Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-27T02:48:22.286Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-13087 (GCVE-0-2025-13087)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-20 21:32 – Updated: 2025-11-21 16:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Command Injection in Opto22 Groov REST API
Summary
A vulnerability exists in the Opto22 Groov Manage REST API on GRV-EPIC and groov RIO Products that allows remote code execution with root privileges. When a POST request is executed against the vulnerable endpoint, the application reads certain header details and unsafely uses these values to build commands, allowing an attacker with administrative privileges to inject arbitrary commands that execute as root.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
Impacted products
5 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opto22 | GRV-EPIC-PR1 |
Affected:
0 , < 4.0.3
(custom)
|
|
| Opto22 | GRV-EPIC-PR2 |
Affected:
0 , < 4.0.3
(custom)
|
|
| Opto22 | groov RIO GRV-R7-MM1001-10 |
Affected:
0 , < 4.0.3
(custom)
|
|
| Opto22 | groov RIO GRV-R7-MM2001-10 |
Affected:
0 , < 4.0.3
(custom)
|
|
| Opto22 | groov RIO GRV-R7-I1VAPM-3 |
Affected:
0 , < 4.0.3
(custom)
|
Date Public
2025-11-20 20:35
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-13087",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-21T16:01:30.468009Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-21T16:01:40.324Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GRV-EPIC-PR1",
"vendor": "Opto22",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "GRV-EPIC-PR2",
"vendor": "Opto22",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "groov RIO GRV-R7-MM1001-10",
"vendor": "Opto22",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "groov RIO GRV-R7-MM2001-10",
"vendor": "Opto22",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "groov RIO GRV-R7-I1VAPM-3",
"vendor": "Opto22",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Nik Tsytsarkin of Meta reported this vulnerability to CISA."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ismail Aydemir of Meta reported this vulnerability to CISA."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Ryan Hall of Meta reported this vulnerability to CISA."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-11-20T20:35:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eA vulnerability exists in the Opto22 Groov Manage REST API on GRV-EPIC and groov RIO Products that allows remote code execution with root privileges. When a POST request is executed against the vulnerable endpoint, the application reads certain header details and unsafely uses these values to build commands, allowing an attacker with administrative privileges to inject arbitrary commands that execute as root.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A vulnerability exists in the Opto22 Groov Manage REST API on GRV-EPIC and groov RIO Products that allows remote code execution with root privileges. When a POST request is executed against the vulnerable endpoint, the application reads certain header details and unsafely uses these values to build commands, allowing an attacker with administrative privileges to inject arbitrary commands that execute as root."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-20T21:32:37.510Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-324-03"
},
{
"url": "https://www.opto22.com/support/resources-tools/knowledgebase/kb91326"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2025/icsa-25-324-03.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eOpto 22 has published a patch to address this vulnerability and recommends that users upgrade to GRV-EPIC and groov RIO Firmware Version 4.0.3. Additional information is available from Opto 22 \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://www.opto22.com/support/resources-tools/knowledgebase/kb91326\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Opto 22 has published a patch to address this vulnerability and recommends that users upgrade to GRV-EPIC and groov RIO Firmware Version 4.0.3. Additional information is available from Opto 22 here https://www.opto22.com/support/resources-tools/knowledgebase/kb91326 ."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-25-324-03",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Command Injection in Opto22 Groov REST API",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-13087",
"datePublished": "2025-11-20T21:32:37.510Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-12T19:41:06.455Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-21T16:01:40.324Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-12744 (GCVE-0-2025-12744)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-03 08:33 – Updated: 2025-12-03 14:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Abrt: command-injection in abrt leading to local privilege escalation
Summary
A flaw was found in the ABRT daemon’s handling of user-supplied mount information.ABRT copies up to 12 characters from an untrusted input and places them directly into a shell command (docker inspect %s) without proper validation. An unprivileged local user can craft a payload that injects shell metacharacters, causing the root-running ABRT process to execute attacker-controlled commands and ultimately gain full root privileges.
Severity
8.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12744 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2412467 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
4 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Affected:
0 , < 2.17.7
(semver)
|
|||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8 |
Date Public
2025-12-03 07:51
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12744",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-12-03T14:21:48.241054Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T14:21:59.766Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/abrt/abrt",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "abrt",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.17.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"packageName": "abrt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "abrt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "abrt",
"product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Red Hat would like to thank Chris Moberly for reporting this issue."
}
],
"datePublic": "2025-12-03T07:51:30.585Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in the ABRT daemon\u2019s handling of user-supplied mount information.ABRT copies up to 12 characters from an untrusted input and places them directly into a shell command (docker inspect %s) without proper validation. An unprivileged local user can craft a payload that injects shell metacharacters, causing the root-running ABRT process to execute attacker-controlled commands and ultimately gain full root privileges."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T08:33:06.547Z",
"orgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"shortName": "fedora"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12744"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2412467",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2412467"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-11-05T11:32:15.385Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-12-03T07:51:30.585Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "Abrt: command-injection in abrt leading to local privilege escalation",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don\u0027t meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."
}
],
"x_redhatCweChain": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "92fb86c3-55a5-4fb5-9c3f-4757b9e96dc5",
"assignerShortName": "fedora",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12744",
"datePublished": "2025-12-03T08:33:06.547Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-05T11:48:30.039Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-12-03T14:21:59.766Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-12742 (GCVE-0-2025-12742)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-25 05:38 – Updated: 2025-11-25 14:39
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver
Summary
A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.
Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.
This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances. No user action is required for these.
Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.
The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :
* 24.12.108+
* 24.18.200+
* 25.0.78+
* 25.6.65+
* 25.8.47+
* 25.12.10+
* 25.14+
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Cloud | Looker |
Affected:
0 , < 24.12.108
(custom)
Affected: 0 , < 24.18.200 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.0.78 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.6.65 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.8.47 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.12.10 (custom) Affected: 0 , < 25.14 (custom) |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12742",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T14:38:27.546926Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:39:05.212Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Looker-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
},
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Self-hosted"
],
"product": "Looker",
"vendor": "Google Cloud",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "24.12.108",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "24.18.200",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.0.78",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.6.65",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.8.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.12.10",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThan": "25.14",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sivanesh Ashok"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Sreeram KL"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\u003cbr\u003eThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u0026nbsp;No user action is required for these.\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eas soon as possible\u003c/span\u003e. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003eThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page \u003c/span\u003e\u003ca target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https://download.looker.com/\"\u003ehttps://download.looker.com/\u003c/a\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e:\u003cbr\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.12.108+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e24.18.200+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.0.78+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.6.65+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.8.47+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.12.10+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(252, 252, 252);\"\u003e25.14+\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A Looker user with a Developer role could cause Looker to execute a malicious command, due to insecure processing of Teradata driver parameters.\n\nLooker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable.\nThis issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted instances.\u00a0No user action is required for these.\n\n\nSelf-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted.\nThe versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ :\n * 24.12.108+\n * 24.18.200+\n * 25.0.78+\n * 25.6.65+\n * 25.8.47+\n * 25.12.10+\n * 25.14+"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"providerUrgency": "RED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Red",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"orgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"shortName": "GoogleCloud"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2025-052"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Remote Code Execution in Looker via Teradata JDBC Driver",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.4.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f45cbf4e-4146-4068-b7e1-655ffc2c548c",
"assignerShortName": "GoogleCloud",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12742",
"datePublished": "2025-11-25T05:38:47.907Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-11-05T10:50:53.509Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-25T14:39:05.212Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-12489 (GCVE-0-2025-12489)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-06 20:11 – Updated: 2025-11-06 20:43
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
evernote-mcp-server openBrowser Command Injection Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Summary
evernote-mcp-server openBrowser Command Injection Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of evernote-mcp-server. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the openBrowser function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-27913.
Severity
7.8 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-78 - Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-… | x_research-advisory |
| https://github.com/brentmid/evernote-mcp-server/c… | vendor-advisory |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| evernote-mcp-server | evernote-mcp-server |
Affected:
2.1.0
|
Date Public
2025-10-30 21:04
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12489",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-11-06T20:43:27.180998Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-06T20:43:33.002Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "evernote-mcp-server",
"vendor": "evernote-mcp-server",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0"
}
]
}
],
"dateAssigned": "2025-10-29T19:52:24.090Z",
"datePublic": "2025-10-30T21:04:41.438Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "evernote-mcp-server openBrowser Command Injection Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of evernote-mcp-server. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability.\n\nThe specific flaw exists within the openBrowser function. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of the service account. Was ZDI-CAN-27913."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 7.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.0"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (\u0027OS Command Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-06T20:11:32.632Z",
"orgId": "99f1926a-a320-47d8-bbb5-42feb611262e",
"shortName": "zdi"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "ZDI-25-983",
"tags": [
"x_research-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-983/"
},
{
"name": "vendor-provided URL",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/brentmid/evernote-mcp-server/commit/1e66c78c4ce6ea294ac6b0eb289a9eae9c5e9579"
}
],
"source": {
"lang": "en",
"value": "Peter Girnus (@gothburz) and Brandon Niemczyk of Trend Zero Day Initiative"
},
"title": "evernote-mcp-server openBrowser Command Injection Privilege Escalation Vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "99f1926a-a320-47d8-bbb5-42feb611262e",
"assignerShortName": "zdi",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12489",
"datePublished": "2025-11-06T20:11:32.632Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-29T19:52:24.019Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-11-06T20:43:33.002Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2025-12296 (GCVE-0-2025-12296)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-27 16:32 – Updated: 2025-10-30 14:17 Unsupported When Assigned
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update sub_4174B0 os command injection
Summary
A security vulnerability has been detected in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC13. The impacted element is the function sub_4174B0 of the component Firmware Update Handler. The manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://vuldb.com/?id.329964 | vdb-entrytechnical-description |
| https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.329964 | signaturepermissions-required |
| https://vuldb.com/?submit.675855 | third-party-advisory |
| https://github.com/IOTRes/IOT_Firmware_Update/blo… | exploitpatch |
| https://www.dlink.com/ | product |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-12296",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2025-10-27T17:28:33.048393Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-30T14:17:17.330Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"Firmware Update Handler"
],
"product": "DAP-2695",
"vendor": "D-Link",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.00RC13"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "IOT_Res (VulDB User)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A security vulnerability has been detected in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC13. The impacted element is the function sub_4174B0 of the component Firmware Update Handler. The manipulation leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer."
},
{
"lang": "de",
"value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in D-Link DAP-2695 2.00RC13 gefunden. Hiervon betroffen ist die Funktion sub_4174B0 der Komponente Firmware Update Handler. Die Ver\u00e4nderung resultiert in os command injection. Ein Angriff ist aus der Distanz m\u00f6glich. Die Ausnutzung wurde ver\u00f6ffentlicht und kann verwendet werden."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"version": "4.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_0": {
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L/E:P/RL:X/RC:R",
"version": "3.0"
}
},
{
"cvssV2_0": {
"baseScore": 5.8,
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR",
"version": "2.0"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-78",
"description": "OS Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-77",
"description": "Command Injection",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-27T16:32:09.223Z",
"orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"shortName": "VulDB"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "VDB-329964 | D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update sub_4174B0 os command injection",
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"technical-description"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.329964"
},
{
"name": "VDB-329964 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
"tags": [
"signature",
"permissions-required"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.329964"
},
{
"name": "Submit #675855 | DLink DAP-2695 v2.00RC131 CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.675855"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/IOTRes/IOT_Firmware_Update/blob/main/Dlink/DAP-2695_Injection.md"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.dlink.com/"
}
],
"tags": [
"unsupported-when-assigned"
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-26T00:00:00.000Z",
"value": "Advisory disclosed"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-26T02:00:00.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry created"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2025-10-26T17:51:08.000Z",
"value": "VulDB entry last update"
}
],
"title": "D-Link DAP-2695 Firmware Update sub_4174B0 os command injection"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
"assignerShortName": "VulDB",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-12296",
"datePublished": "2025-10-27T16:32:09.223Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-10-26T16:46:00.437Z",
"dateUpdated": "2025-10-30T14:17:17.330Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
- Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
- OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Mitigation MIT-4.3
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Mitigation MIT-28
Implementation
Strategy: Output Encoding
While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
Mitigation
Implementation
If the program to be executed allows arguments to be specified within an input file or from standard input, then consider using that mode to pass arguments instead of the command line.
Mitigation MIT-27
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Parameterization
- If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
- Some languages offer multiple functions that can be used to invoke commands. Where possible, identify any function that invokes a command shell using a single string, and replace it with a function that requires individual arguments. These functions typically perform appropriate quoting and filtering of arguments. For example, in C, the system() function accepts a string that contains the entire command to be executed, whereas execl(), execve(), and others require an array of strings, one for each argument. In Windows, CreateProcess() only accepts one command at a time. In Perl, if system() is provided with an array of arguments, then it will quote each of the arguments.
Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- When constructing OS command strings, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set based on the expected value of the parameter in the request. This will indirectly limit the scope of an attack, but this technique is less important than proper output encoding and escaping.
- Note that proper output encoding, escaping, and quoting is the most effective solution for preventing OS command injection, although input validation may provide some defense-in-depth. This is because it effectively limits what will appear in output. Input validation will not always prevent OS command injection, especially if you are required to support free-form text fields that could contain arbitrary characters. For example, when invoking a mail program, you might need to allow the subject field to contain otherwise-dangerous inputs like ";" and ">" characters, which would need to be escaped or otherwise handled. In this case, stripping the character might reduce the risk of OS command injection, but it would produce incorrect behavior because the subject field would not be recorded as the user intended. This might seem to be a minor inconvenience, but it could be more important when the program relies on well-structured subject lines in order to pass messages to other components.
- Even if you make a mistake in your validation (such as forgetting one out of 100 input fields), appropriate encoding is still likely to protect you from injection-based attacks. As long as it is not done in isolation, input validation is still a useful technique, since it may significantly reduce your attack surface, allow you to detect some attacks, and provide other security benefits that proper encoding does not address.
Mitigation MIT-21
Architecture and Design
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
- Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
- If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
- Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
- In the context of OS Command Injection, error information passed back to the user might reveal whether an OS command is being executed and possibly which command is being used.
Mitigation
Operation
Strategy: Sandbox or Jail
Use runtime policy enforcement to create an allowlist of allowable commands, then prevent use of any command that does not appear in the allowlist. Technologies such as AppArmor are available to do this.
Mitigation MIT-29
Operation
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design
Operation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation
Implementation
Strategy: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
CAPEC-108: Command Line Execution through SQL Injection
An attacker uses standard SQL injection methods to inject data into the command line for execution. This could be done directly through misuse of directives such as MSSQL_xp_cmdshell or indirectly through injection of data into the database that would be interpreted as shell commands. Sometime later, an unscrupulous backend application (or could be part of the functionality of the same application) fetches the injected data stored in the database and uses this data as command line arguments without performing proper validation. The malicious data escapes that data plane by spawning new commands to be executed on the host.
CAPEC-15: Command Delimiters
An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities that allows an attacker's commands to be concatenated onto a legitimate command with the intent of targeting other resources such as the file system or database. The system that uses a filter or denylist input validation, as opposed to allowlist validation is vulnerable to an attacker who predicts delimiters (or combinations of delimiters) not present in the filter or denylist. As with other injection attacks, the attacker uses the command delimiter payload as an entry point to tunnel through the application and activate additional attacks through SQL queries, shell commands, network scanning, and so on.
CAPEC-43: Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation Layers
An attacker supplies the target software with input data that contains sequences of special characters designed to bypass input validation logic. This exploit relies on the target making multiples passes over the input data and processing a "layer" of special characters with each pass. In this manner, the attacker can disguise input that would otherwise be rejected as invalid by concealing it with layers of special/escape characters that are stripped off by subsequent processing steps. The goal is to first discover cases where the input validation layer executes before one or more parsing layers. That is, user input may go through the following logic in an application: <parser1> --> <input validator> --> <parser2>. In such cases, the attacker will need to provide input that will pass through the input validator, but after passing through parser2, will be converted into something that the input validator was supposed to stop.
CAPEC-6: Argument Injection
An attacker changes the behavior or state of a targeted application through injecting data or command syntax through the targets use of non-validated and non-filtered arguments of exposed services or methods.
CAPEC-88: OS Command Injection
In this type of an attack, an adversary injects operating system commands into existing application functions. An application that uses untrusted input to build command strings is vulnerable. An adversary can leverage OS command injection in an application to elevate privileges, execute arbitrary commands and compromise the underlying operating system.