CWE-601
AllowedURL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.
2304 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-4HR2-XF7W-JF76
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-04 16:57 – Updated: 2025-12-04 16:57Impact
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a victim, redirects them to a phishing website designed to mimic the legitimate Central Dogma login page. This could result in the compromise of user accounts and unauthorized access to the Central Dogma instance.
Patches
This vulnerability is addressed and resolved in Central Dogma version 0.78.0. The server operators who run Central Dogma server with Shiro authentication are strongly encouraged to upgrade to this version or later to mitigate the risk associated with the open redirect vulnerability.
Workarounds
Implement AuthProvider to overrides webLoginService().
References
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server-auth-shiro"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.78.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-11222"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-04T16:57:17Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-04T13:15:46Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nSuccessful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a victim, redirects them to a phishing website designed to mimic the legitimate Central Dogma login page. This could result in the compromise of user accounts and unauthorized access to the Central Dogma instance.\n\n### Patches\nThis vulnerability is addressed and resolved in Central Dogma version 0.78.0. The server operators who run Central Dogma server with Shiro authentication are strongly encouraged to upgrade to this version or later to mitigate the risk associated with the open redirect vulnerability.\n\n### Workarounds\nImplement `AuthProvider` to overrides `webLoginService()`.\n\n### References\n- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html",
"id": "GHSA-4hr2-xf7w-jf76",
"modified": "2025-12-04T16:57:17Z",
"published": "2025-12-04T16:57:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/line/centraldogma/security/advisories/GHSA-4hr2-xf7w-jf76"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11222"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/line/centraldogma/pull/1207"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/line/centraldogma/commit/95e7bbd77266493e4ec70b670bd91fa3e3289de0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/line/centraldogma"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Central Dogma\u0027s Login Function Has an Open Redirect Vulnerability"
}
GHSA-4JF4-WR6Q-827P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-23 21:36 – Updated: 2025-07-23 21:36A URL redirection in lbry-desktop v0.53.9 allows attackers to redirect victim users to attacker-controlled pages.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-50477"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-23T19:15:33Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A URL redirection in lbry-desktop v0.53.9 allows attackers to redirect victim users to attacker-controlled pages.",
"id": "GHSA-4jf4-wr6q-827p",
"modified": "2025-07-23T21:36:46Z",
"published": "2025-07-23T21:36:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-50477"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HLxOWDSq6DHeZTVNcY0Tgkcd_eWTqYAS/view"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://gist.github.com/Suuuuuzy/a3df9e88a41f9641c37e6d663f9b539c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://suuuuuzy.github.io/mostly-harmless/lbry_poc/index.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4JH7-C2VV-7QF2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-30 18:31 – Updated: 2025-05-12 18:31Websites directing users to long URLs that caused eliding to occur in the location view could leverage the truncating behavior to potentially trick users into thinking they were on a different webpage This vulnerability affects Focus < 138.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-3859"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-451",
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-30T17:15:50Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Websites directing users to long URLs that caused eliding to occur in the location view could leverage the truncating behavior to potentially trick users into thinking they were on a different webpage This vulnerability affects Focus \u003c 138.",
"id": "GHSA-4jh7-c2vv-7qf2",
"modified": "2025-05-12T18:31:20Z",
"published": "2025-04-30T18:31:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-3859"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1951533"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-33"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4JHF-C33F-VGVG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:02 – Updated: 2025-04-20 03:36Opera Mini 13 and Opera Stable 36 allow remote attackers to spoof the displayed URL via a crafted HTML document, related to the about:blank URL.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-4075"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-04-21T02:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Opera Mini 13 and Opera Stable 36 allow remote attackers to spoof the displayed URL via a crafted HTML document, related to the about:blank URL.",
"id": "GHSA-4jhf-c33f-vgvg",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:36:27Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:02:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4075"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://abhikafle.com.np/opera-url-spoofing-poc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98004"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4JHW-2P6J-5WMP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-03-23 01:53 – Updated: 2021-03-29 18:07Problem
It has been discovered that Login Handling is susceptible to open redirection which allows attackers redirecting to arbitrary content, and conducting phishing attacks. No authentication is required in order to exploit this vulnerability.
Solution
Update to TYPO3 versions 6.2.57, 7.6.51, 8.7.40, 9.5.25, 10.4.14, 11.1.1 that fix the problem described.
Credits
Thanks to Alexander Kellner who reported this issue and to TYPO3 security team member Torben Hansen who fixed the issue.
References
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.2.56"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "6.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.2.57"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 7.6.50"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.6.51"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 8.7.39"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.7.40"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "10.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "10.4.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "11.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "11.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "10.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "10.4.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "11.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "11.1.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "typo3/cms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "9.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-21338"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-03-23T01:41:01Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-03-23T02:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "\n### Problem\nIt has been discovered that Login Handling is susceptible to open redirection which allows attackers redirecting to arbitrary content, and conducting phishing attacks. No authentication is required in order to exploit this vulnerability.\n\n### Solution\nUpdate to TYPO3 versions 6.2.57, 7.6.51, 8.7.40, 9.5.25, 10.4.14, 11.1.1 that fix the problem described.\n\n### Credits\nThanks to Alexander Kellner who reported this issue and to TYPO3 security team member Torben Hansen who fixed the issue.\n\n### References\n* [TYPO3-CORE-SA-2021-001](https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2021-001)",
"id": "GHSA-4jhw-2p6j-5wmp",
"modified": "2021-03-29T18:07:53Z",
"published": "2021-03-23T01:53:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/TYPO3/TYPO3.CMS/security/advisories/GHSA-4jhw-2p6j-5wmp"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/typo3/cms-core/CVE-2021-21338.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/typo3/cms/CVE-2021-21338.yaml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://packagist.org/packages/typo3/cms-core"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://typo3.org/security/advisory/typo3-core-sa-2021-001"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open Redirection in Login Handling"
}
GHSA-4JVR-8WQ7-595Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-04 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:47A URL redirection to untrusted site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability [CWE-601] in FortiNAC-F version 7.2.0, FortiNAC version 9.4.1 and below, 9.2 all versions, 9.1 all versions, 8.8 all versions, 8.7 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to redirect users to any arbitrary website via a crafted URL.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-43950"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-05-03T22:15:09Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A URL redirection to untrusted site (\u0027Open Redirect\u0027) vulnerability [CWE-601] in FortiNAC-F version 7.2.0, FortiNAC version 9.4.1 and below, 9.2 all versions, 9.1 all versions, \n 8.8 all versions, 8.7 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to redirect users to any arbitrary website via a crafted URL.",
"id": "GHSA-4jvr-8wq7-595q",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:47:32Z",
"published": "2023-05-04T00:30:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-43950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-22-407"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-4MCW-W8HG-PH3C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:46 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:46There is an open redirect in the PhastPress WordPress plugin before 1.111 that allows an attacker to malform a request to a page with the plugin and then redirect the victim to a malicious page. There is also a support comment from another user one year ago (https://wordpress.org/support/topic/phast-php-used-for-remote-fetch/) that says that the php involved in the request only go to whitelisted pages but it's possible to redirect the victim to any domain.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-24210"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-05T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is an open redirect in the PhastPress WordPress plugin before 1.111 that allows an attacker to malform a request to a page with the plugin and then redirect the victim to a malicious page. There is also a support comment from another user one year ago (https://wordpress.org/support/topic/phast-php-used-for-remote-fetch/) that says that the php involved in the request only go to whitelisted pages but it\u0027s possible to redirect the victim to any domain.",
"id": "GHSA-4mcw-w8hg-ph3c",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:46:34Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:46:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-24210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2497610"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9b3c5412-8699-49e8-b60c-20d2085857fb"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-4MF2-F3WH-GVF2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-05-25 18:42 – Updated: 2021-05-21 21:37Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? For users that use the whitelist domain feature, a domain that ended in a similar way to the intended domain could have been allowed as a redirect.
For example, if a whitelist domain was configured for .example.com, the intention is that subdomains of example.com are allowed.
Instead, example.com and badexample.com could also match.
Patches
Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? This is fixed in version 7.0.0 onwards.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Disable the whitelist domain feature and run separate OAuth2 Proxy instances for each subdomain.
Original Issue Posted by @semoac:
Whitelist Domain feature is not working as expected because is not matching a dot to ensure the redirect is a subdomain.
Expected Behavior
If whitelist domain is set to .example.com , then hack.alienexample.com should be rejected as a valid redirect.
Current Behavior
The code is removing the dot from .example.com and only checking if the redirect string end with example.com
Possible Solution
Here https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/blob/c377466411f2aee180a732187edb638f2f7e57fb/oauthproxy.go#L661
Include the dot when checking the string:
strings.HasSuffix(redirectHostname, "." + domainHostname)
Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
package main
import (
"fmt"
"strings"
)
func validOptionalPort(port string) bool {
if port == "" || port == ":*" {
return true
}
if port[0] != ':' {
return false
}
for _, b := range port[1:] {
if b < '0' || b > '9' {
return false
}
}
return true
}
func splitHostPort(hostport string) (host, port string) {
host = hostport
colon := strings.LastIndexByte(host, ':')
if colon != -1 && validOptionalPort(host[colon:]) {
host, port = host[:colon], host[colon+1:]
}
if strings.HasPrefix(host, "[") && strings.HasSuffix(host, "]") {
host = host[1 : len(host)-1]
}
return
}
func main() {
domain := ".example.com"
domainHostname, _ := splitHostPort(strings.TrimLeft(domain, "."))
redirectHostname := "https://hack.alienexample.com"
if (strings.HasPrefix(domain, ".") && strings.HasSuffix(redirectHostname, domainHostname)) { fmt.Println("This should not have happen.")}
}
Users of github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy are advised to update to github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.0.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "3.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-21291"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-21T21:37:23Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nFor users that use the whitelist domain feature, a domain that ended in a similar way to the intended domain could have been allowed as a redirect.\n\nFor example, if a whitelist domain was configured for `.example.com`, the intention is that subdomains of `example.com` are allowed.\nInstead, `example.com` and `badexample.com` could also match.\n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\nThis is fixed in version 7.0.0 onwards.\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\nDisable the whitelist domain feature and run separate OAuth2 Proxy instances for each subdomain.\n\n# Original Issue Posted by @semoac:\n\nWhitelist Domain feature is not working as expected because is not matching a dot to ensure the redirect is a subdomain.\n\n## Expected Behavior\n\nIf whitelist domain is set to `.example.com` , then `hack.alienexample.com` should be rejected as a valid redirect.\n\n## Current Behavior\n\nThe code is removing the `dot` from `.example.com` and only checking if the redirect string end with `example.com`\n\n## Possible Solution\nHere\nhttps://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/blob/c377466411f2aee180a732187edb638f2f7e57fb/oauthproxy.go#L661\n\nInclude the dot when checking the string:\n```\nstrings.HasSuffix(redirectHostname, \".\" + domainHostname)\n```\n\n## Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)\n\n```\npackage main\n\nimport (\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"strings\"\n)\n\nfunc validOptionalPort(port string) bool {\n\tif port == \"\" || port == \":*\" {\n\t\treturn true\n\t}\n\tif port[0] != \u0027:\u0027 {\n\t\treturn false\n\t}\n\tfor _, b := range port[1:] {\n\t\tif b \u003c \u00270\u0027 || b \u003e \u00279\u0027 {\n\t\t\treturn false\n\t\t}\n\t}\n\treturn true\n}\n\nfunc splitHostPort(hostport string) (host, port string) {\n\thost = hostport\n\n\tcolon := strings.LastIndexByte(host, \u0027:\u0027)\n\tif colon != -1 \u0026\u0026 validOptionalPort(host[colon:]) {\n\t\thost, port = host[:colon], host[colon+1:]\n\t}\n\n\tif strings.HasPrefix(host, \"[\") \u0026\u0026 strings.HasSuffix(host, \"]\") {\n\t\thost = host[1 : len(host)-1]\n\t}\n\n\treturn\n}\n\nfunc main() {\n\tdomain := \".example.com\"\n\tdomainHostname, _ := splitHostPort(strings.TrimLeft(domain, \".\"))\n\tredirectHostname := \"https://hack.alienexample.com\"\n\tif (strings.HasPrefix(domain, \".\") \u0026\u0026 strings.HasSuffix(redirectHostname, domainHostname)) { fmt.Println(\"This should not have happen.\")}\n}\n\n```\n\nUsers of `github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy` are advised to update to `github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7`",
"id": "GHSA-4mf2-f3wh-gvf2",
"modified": "2021-05-21T21:37:23Z",
"published": "2021-05-25T18:42:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-4mf2-f3wh-gvf2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/commit/780ae4f3c99b579cb2ea9845121caebb6192f725"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/releases/tag/v7.0.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/oauth2-proxy/oauth2-proxy/v7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Subdomain checking of whitelisted domains could allow unintended redirects in oauth2-proxy"
}
GHSA-4MJP-F7VP-45V6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-18 00:30 – Updated: 2025-07-18 00:30A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.12.0. Affected is an unknown function of the component Site Controller/SSO. The manipulation leads to open redirect. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 3d06b8d009d0267f0255acc87ea19d29d07cedc3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. Multiple endpoints are affected.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-7763"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-17T23:15:23Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.12.0. Affected is an unknown function of the component Site Controller/SSO. The manipulation leads to open redirect. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The patch is identified as 3d06b8d009d0267f0255acc87ea19d29d07cedc3. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. Multiple endpoints are affected.",
"id": "GHSA-4mjp-f7vp-45v6",
"modified": "2025-07-18T00:30:32Z",
"published": "2025-07-18T00:30:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-7763"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thinkgem/jeesite5/issues/28"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thinkgem/jeesite5/issues/28#issuecomment-3045862239"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thinkgem/jeesite5/issues/29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thinkgem/jeesite5/commit/3d06b8d009d0267f0255acc87ea19d29d07cedc3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.316758"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.316758"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.616103"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.616104"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-4MRR-3CMP-Q26R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-27 21:30 – Updated: 2025-01-28 21:31An issue in Beijing Baidu Netcom Science & Technology Co Ltd Baidu Lite app (iOS version) 6.40.0 allows attackers to access user information via supplying a crafted link.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-56952"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-601"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-27T19:15:16Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue in Beijing Baidu Netcom Science \u0026 Technology Co Ltd Baidu Lite app (iOS version) 6.40.0 allows attackers to access user information via supplying a crafted link.",
"id": "GHSA-4mrr-3cmp-q26r",
"modified": "2025-01-28T21:31:02Z",
"published": "2025-01-27T21:30:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56952"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ZhouZiyi1/Vuls/blob/main/241217-BaiduLite/241217-BaiduLite.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
Mitigation
Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
Mitigation MIT-21.2
Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion
- When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
- For example, ID 1 could map to "/login.asp" and ID 2 could map to "http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
Mitigation
Ensure that no externally-supplied requests are honored by requiring that all redirect requests include a unique nonce generated by the application [REF-483]. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
Mitigation MIT-6
Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
- Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.
Mitigation MIT-29
Strategy: Firewall
Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
CAPEC-178: Cross-Site Flashing
An attacker is able to trick the victim into executing a Flash document that passes commands or calls to a Flash player browser plugin, allowing the attacker to exploit native Flash functionality in the client browser. This attack pattern occurs where an attacker can provide a crafted link to a Flash document (SWF file) which, when followed, will cause additional malicious instructions to be executed. The attacker does not need to serve or control the Flash document. The attack takes advantage of the fact that Flash files can reference external URLs. If variables that serve as URLs that the Flash application references can be controlled through parameters, then by creating a link that includes values for those parameters, an attacker can cause arbitrary content to be referenced and possibly executed by the targeted Flash application.