Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-367

Allowed

Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

1205 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-H5J4-JJ3M-XGPG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-13 00:32 – Updated: 2026-02-13 00:32
VLAI
Details

Intego Log Reporter, a macOS diagnostic utility bundled with Intego security products that collects system and application logs for support analysis, contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. A root-executed diagnostic script creates and writes files in /tmp without enforcing secure directory handling, introducing a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition. A local unprivileged user can exploit a symlink-based race condition to cause arbitrary file writes to privileged system locations, resulting in privilege escalation to root.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-26224"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-12T22:16:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Intego Log Reporter, a macOS diagnostic utility bundled with Intego security products that collects system and application logs for support analysis, contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability. A root-executed diagnostic script creates and writes files in /tmp without enforcing secure directory handling, introducing a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition. A local unprivileged user can exploit a symlink-based race condition to cause arbitrary file writes to privileged system locations, resulting in privilege escalation to root.",
  "id": "GHSA-h5j4-jj3m-xgpg",
  "modified": "2026-02-13T00:32:52Z",
  "published": "2026-02-13T00:32:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-26224"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.quarkslab.com/intego_lpe_macos_1.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://blog.quarkslab.com/resources/2026-02-10_intego_1/40945709530779-How-to-Use-the-Intego-Log-Reporter.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.intego.com"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/intego-log-reporter-toctou-local-privilege-escalation"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-H5R6-2GQ4-P8X5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-19 21:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:35
VLAI
Details

Avast and AVG Antivirus for Windows were susceptible to a Time-of-check/Time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in the restore process leading to arbitrary file creation. The issue was fixed with Avast and AVG Antivirus version 22.11

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-1586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-04-19T19:15:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Avast and AVG Antivirus for Windows were susceptible to a Time-of-check/Time-of-use (TOCTOU)  vulnerability in the restore process leading to arbitrary file creation. The issue was fixed with Avast and AVG Antivirus version 22.11",
  "id": "GHSA-h5r6-2gq4-p8x5",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T03:35:21Z",
  "published": "2023-04-19T21:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.norton.com/sp/static/external/tools/security-advisories.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-H5XR-3X7R-2W3W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-06-15 00:00 – Updated: 2022-06-23 00:00
VLAI
Details

Possible hypervisor memory corruption due to TOC TOU race condition when updating address mappings in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-35090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-06-14T10:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Possible hypervisor memory corruption due to TOC TOU race condition when updating address mappings in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile",
  "id": "GHSA-h5xr-3x7r-2w3w",
  "modified": "2022-06-23T00:00:25Z",
  "published": "2022-06-15T00:00:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35090"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/may-2022-bulletin"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-H6VW-38XQ-3XWX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-23 09:30 – Updated: 2026-03-23 15:30
VLAI
Details

The Intel EPT paging code uses an optimization to defer flushing of any cached EPT state until the p2m lock is dropped, so that multiple modifications done under the same locked region only issue a single flush.

Freeing of paging structures however is not deferred until the flushing is done, and can result in freed pages transiently being present in cached state. Such stale entries can point to memory ranges not owned by the guest, thus allowing access to unintended memory regions.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23554"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-23T07:16:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Intel EPT paging code uses an optimization to defer flushing of any cached\nEPT state until the p2m lock is dropped, so that multiple modifications done\nunder the same locked region only issue a single flush.\n\nFreeing of paging structures however is not deferred until the flushing is\ndone, and can result in freed pages transiently being present in cached state.\nSuch stale entries can point to memory ranges not owned by the guest, thus\nallowing access to unintended memory regions.",
  "id": "GHSA-h6vw-38xq-3xwx",
  "modified": "2026-03-23T15:30:43Z",
  "published": "2026-03-23T09:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23554"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-480.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/03/17/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-480.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-H6X2-583H-X99R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 20:38 – Updated: 2026-08-04 21:07
VLAI
Summary
Open WebUI: DNS Rebinding SSRF Bypass
Details

Summary

Open WebUI vetted user-supplied URLs by resolving the hostname once and rejecting private, loopback and link-local addresses, then let the HTTP client resolve that hostname again at connect time. An attacker who controls the authoritative DNS for a hostname they submit can answer with a public address during the check and an internal one at connect, so the fetch reaches an address the check was meant to block. Every user-reachable fetch gated by that check was affected, and most of them hand the internal response back to the attacker.

Preconditions

  • An account on the instance. No admin rights and no non-default configuration.
  • Control of the authoritative DNS for a hostname the attacker submits, serving a TTL of 0 and alternating answers.
  • One of the affected entry points: URL ingest for retrieval, an image_url in a chat completion, image editing, or the OAuth profile-picture fetch.
  • The OAuth path additionally needs OAuth login configured and a picture claim (OAUTH_PICTURE_CLAIM, default picture) the user can influence, which is the case on self-service OIDC providers and providers with a user-editable avatar URL. On an existing account it also needs OAUTH_UPDATE_PICTURE_ON_LOGIN, which is off by default. Deployments without OAuth are not affected on that path; the other paths need no configuration at all.

Impact

The server can be made to issue requests to addresses only it can reach: cloud instance metadata such as 169.254.169.254, loopback-bound admin APIs, and internal network services. The response comes back to the attacker on most paths, as document content on the retrieval path, described by the vision model on the chat image path, and base64-encoded into the profile picture on the OAuth path; the image-edit path is blind. On the OAuth path the server also forwards the OAuth access token as a Bearer header to the fetched URL, so a rebind hands that token to the internal target. On a cloud host with IMDSv1 reachable this is enough to take instance IAM credentials.

Exploitation depends on winning the gap between the two resolutions, which the attacker influences but does not fully control. Admin-configured image-generation backends and the shared session pool are not affected and deliberately keep the default client, since an administrator may legitimately point those at an internal host.

Fix

Fixed in v0.11.0 (#24759, #25775, #25960, #26699). The check now happens at the connection layer instead of ahead of it: a requests transport adapter resolves the hostname once and connects to that same validated address, and an aiohttp resolver applies the same global-IP check, exposed as a one-off session used by every fetch behind the URL check. Upgrading to v0.11.0 resolves this with no configuration change.

Root cause

Affected components: - retrieval web loader (SafeWebBaseLoader) - retrieval content probe (get_content_from_url) - chat image fetch (get_image_base64_from_url) - image edit fetch (load_url_image) - OAuth profile-picture fetch (_process_picture_url)

The URL check resolved the hostname and inspected the resulting IP, but nothing tied that decision to the connection that followed: the HTTP client resolved the name again on its own, and the second answer was never inspected. The check was therefore an opinion about a past lookup rather than a constraint on the actual connection, which is what a rebinding DNS server defeats. The first connection-layer guard covered only the retrieval loader, leaving the sibling probe, image and OAuth fetches on default clients until each was reported in turn.

Credits

  • @rezaduty — the rebinding time-of-check/time-of-use bypass and the retrieval loader path.
  • @nikchillz — the retrieval content-probe path.
  • @dhyabi2 — the chat image_url path, where the internal response is read back through the vision model.
  • @geo-chen — the image-edit path.
  • @bogdancherniy11-sudo — the OAuth profile-picture path, where the rebind also discloses the forwarded OAuth access token.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.10.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "open-webui"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54020"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367",
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-04T20:38:34Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\nOpen WebUI vetted user-supplied URLs by resolving the hostname once and rejecting private, loopback and link-local addresses, then let the HTTP client resolve that hostname again at connect time. An attacker who controls the authoritative DNS for a hostname they submit can answer with a public address during the check and an internal one at connect, so the fetch reaches an address the check was meant to block. Every user-reachable fetch gated by that check was affected, and most of them hand the internal response back to the attacker.\n\n## Preconditions\n- An account on the instance. No admin rights and no non-default configuration.\n- Control of the authoritative DNS for a hostname the attacker submits, serving a TTL of 0 and alternating answers.\n- One of the affected entry points: URL ingest for retrieval, an `image_url` in a chat completion, image editing, or the OAuth profile-picture fetch.\n- The OAuth path additionally needs OAuth login configured and a picture claim (`OAUTH_PICTURE_CLAIM`, default `picture`) the user can influence, which is the case on self-service OIDC providers and providers with a user-editable avatar URL. On an existing account it also needs `OAUTH_UPDATE_PICTURE_ON_LOGIN`, which is off by default. Deployments without OAuth are not affected on that path; the other paths need no configuration at all.\n\n## Impact\nThe server can be made to issue requests to addresses only it can reach: cloud instance metadata such as 169.254.169.254, loopback-bound admin APIs, and internal network services. The response comes back to the attacker on most paths, as document content on the retrieval path, described by the vision model on the chat image path, and base64-encoded into the profile picture on the OAuth path; the image-edit path is blind. On the OAuth path the server also forwards the OAuth access token as a Bearer header to the fetched URL, so a rebind hands that token to the internal target. On a cloud host with IMDSv1 reachable this is enough to take instance IAM credentials.\n\nExploitation depends on winning the gap between the two resolutions, which the attacker influences but does not fully control. Admin-configured image-generation backends and the shared session pool are not affected and deliberately keep the default client, since an administrator may legitimately point those at an internal host.\n\n## Fix\nFixed in v0.11.0 (#24759, #25775, #25960, #26699). The check now happens at the connection layer instead of ahead of it: a `requests` transport adapter resolves the hostname once and connects to that same validated address, and an aiohttp resolver applies the same global-IP check, exposed as a one-off session used by every fetch behind the URL check. Upgrading to v0.11.0 resolves this with no configuration change.\n\n## Root cause\nAffected components:\n- retrieval web loader (`SafeWebBaseLoader`)\n- retrieval content probe (`get_content_from_url`)\n- chat image fetch (`get_image_base64_from_url`)\n- image edit fetch (`load_url_image`)\n- OAuth profile-picture fetch (`_process_picture_url`)\n\nThe URL check resolved the hostname and inspected the resulting IP, but nothing tied that decision to the connection that followed: the HTTP client resolved the name again on its own, and the second answer was never inspected. The check was therefore an opinion about a past lookup rather than a constraint on the actual connection, which is what a rebinding DNS server defeats. The first connection-layer guard covered only the retrieval loader, leaving the sibling probe, image and OAuth fetches on default clients until each was reported in turn.\n\n## Credits\n- @rezaduty \u2014 the rebinding time-of-check/time-of-use bypass and the retrieval loader path.\n- @nikchillz \u2014 the retrieval content-probe path.\n- @dhyabi2 \u2014 the chat `image_url` path, where the internal response is read back through the vision model.\n- @geo-chen \u2014 the image-edit path.\n- @bogdancherniy11-sudo \u2014 the OAuth profile-picture path, where the rebind also discloses the forwarded OAuth access token.",
  "id": "GHSA-h6x2-583h-x99r",
  "modified": "2026-08-04T21:07:58Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T20:38:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-h6x2-583h-x99r"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/releases/tag/v0.11.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Open WebUI: DNS Rebinding SSRF Bypass"
}

GHSA-H7P6-FC49-HC5H

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-06 09:30 – Updated: 2025-08-06 09:30
VLAI
Details

Memory corruption while submitting blob data to kernel space though IOCTL.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21455"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-06T08:15:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory corruption while submitting blob data to kernel space though IOCTL.",
  "id": "GHSA-h7p6-fc49-hc5h",
  "modified": "2025-08-06T09:30:35Z",
  "published": "2025-08-06T09:30:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21455"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/august-2025-bulletin.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-H8G9-6GVH-5MRC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-10-06 23:12 – Updated: 2022-10-06 23:12
VLAI
Summary
etcd vulnerable to TOCTOU of gateway endpoint authentication
Details

Vulnerability type

Authentication

Workarounds

Refer to the gateway documentation. The vulnerability was spotted due to unclear documentation of how the gateway handles endpoints validation.

Detail

The gateway only authenticates endpoints detected from DNS SRV records, and it only authenticates the detected endpoints once. Therefore, if an endpoint changes its authentication settings, the gateway will continue to assume the endpoint is still authenticated. The auditors has noted that appropriate documentation of this validation functionality plus deprecation of this misleading functionality is an acceptable path forward.

References

Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Contact the etcd security committee

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.4.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.4.10"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "go.etcd.io/etcd/v3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.3.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-10-06T23:12:38Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Vulnerability type\nAuthentication\n\n### Workarounds\nRefer to the [gateway documentation](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/Documentation/op-guide/gateway.md). The vulnerability was spotted due to unclear documentation of how the gateway handles endpoints validation. \n\n### Detail\nThe gateway only authenticates endpoints detected from DNS SRV records, and it only authenticates the detected endpoints once. Therefore, if an endpoint changes its authentication settings, the gateway will continue to assume the endpoint is still authenticated. The auditors has noted that appropriate documentation of this validation functionality plus deprecation of this misleading functionality is an acceptable path forward.\n\n### References\nFind out more on this vulnerability in the [security audit report](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/SECURITY_AUDIT.pdf)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Contact the [etcd security committee](https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/master/security/security-release-process.md#product-security-committee-psc)",
  "id": "GHSA-h8g9-6gvh-5mrc",
  "modified": "2022-10-06T23:12:38Z",
  "published": "2022-10-06T23:12:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-h8g9-6gvh-5mrc"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "etcd vulnerable to TOCTOU of gateway endpoint authentication"
}

GHSA-HC2G-HVV2-QXV7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-14 18:30 – Updated: 2025-05-14 18:30
VLAI
Details

Time-of-check time-of-use race condition in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an authenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-30663"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-14T18:15:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Time-of-check time-of-use race condition in some Zoom Workplace Apps may allow an authenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access.",
  "id": "GHSA-hc2g-hvv2-qxv7",
  "modified": "2025-05-14T18:30:51Z",
  "published": "2025-05-14T18:30:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30663"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-25016"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HF76-WR32-WV5W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-11 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-08 18:30
VLAI
Details

Double fetch in sandbox kernel driver in Avast/AVG Antivirus <25.3  on windows allows local attacker to escalate privelages via pool overflow.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-13032"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-11-11T17:15:39Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Double fetch in sandbox kernel driver in Avast/AVG Antivirus \u003c25.3\u00a0 on windows allows local attacker to escalate privelages via pool overflow.",
  "id": "GHSA-hf76-wr32-wv5w",
  "modified": "2025-12-08T18:30:25Z",
  "published": "2025-11-11T18:30:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-13032"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.gendigital.com/us/en/contact-us/security-advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-HJF6-MVH5-6GQQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-17 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-21 00:00
VLAI
Details

Memory corruption or temporary denial of service due to improper handling of concurrent hypervisor operations to attach or detach IRQs from virtual interrupt sources in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-22093"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-16T06:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Memory corruption or temporary denial of service due to improper handling of concurrent hypervisor operations to attach or detach IRQs from virtual interrupt sources in Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile",
  "id": "GHSA-hjf6-mvh5-6gqq",
  "modified": "2022-09-21T00:00:51Z",
  "published": "2022-09-17T00:00:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-22093"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.qualcomm.com/company/product-security/bulletins/september-2022-bulletin"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

Mitigation
Implementation

The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.

Mitigation
Implementation

When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.

Mitigation
Implementation Architecture and Design

If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.

Mitigation
Implementation

Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.

Mitigation
Implementation

Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

CAPEC-27: Leveraging Race Conditions via Symbolic Links

This attack leverages the use of symbolic links (Symlinks) in order to write to sensitive files. An attacker can create a Symlink link to a target file not otherwise accessible to them. When the privileged program tries to create a temporary file with the same name as the Symlink link, it will actually write to the target file pointed to by the attackers' Symlink link. If the attacker can insert malicious content in the temporary file they will be writing to the sensitive file by using the Symlink. The race occurs because the system checks if the temporary file exists, then creates the file. The attacker would typically create the Symlink during the interval between the check and the creation of the temporary file.

CAPEC-29: Leveraging Time-of-Check and Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Conditions

This attack targets a race condition occurring between the time of check (state) for a resource and the time of use of a resource. A typical example is file access. The adversary can leverage a file access race condition by "running the race", meaning that they would modify the resource between the first time the target program accesses the file and the time the target program uses the file. During that period of time, the adversary could replace or modify the file, causing the application to behave unexpectedly.