Common Weakness Enumeration
CWE-354
AllowedImproper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product does not validate or incorrectly validates the integrity check values or "checksums" of a message. This may prevent it from detecting if the data has been modified or corrupted in transmission.
251 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-32105 (GCVE-0-2026-32105)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-17 19:27 – Updated: 2026-04-20 16:22
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode
Summary
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-04-20 16:22 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| neutrinolabs | xrdp |
Affected:
< 0.10.6
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-32105",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-20T16:22:40.648583Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-20T16:22:50.262Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "xrdp",
"vendor": "neutrinolabs",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.10.6"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the \"Classic RDP Security\" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-17T19:27:39.809Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/security/advisories/GHSA-j2jm-c596-c5q3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/security/advisories/GHSA-j2jm-c596-c5q3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-j2jm-c596-c5q3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive \u2014 integrity bypass in non-TLS mode"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-32105",
"datePublished": "2026-04-17T19:27:39.809Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-10T22:02:38.854Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-20T16:22:50.262Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-31839 (GCVE-0-2026-31839)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-11 16:46 – Updated: 2026-03-11 17:07
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Striae has a hash validation utility vulnerability
Summary
Striae is a firearms examiner's comparison companion. A high-severity integrity bypass vulnerability existed in Striae's digital confirmation workflow prior to v3.0.0. Hash-only validation trusted manifest hash fields that could be modified together with package content, allowing tampered confirmation packages to pass integrity checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.0.
Severity
8.2 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-11 17:06 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/striae-org/striae/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/striae-org/striae/releases/tag… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| striae-org | striae |
Affected:
>= 0.9.22-0, < 3.0.0
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-31839",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-11T17:06:57.326835Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T17:07:35.742Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "striae",
"vendor": "striae-org",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003e= 0.9.22-0, \u003c 3.0.0"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Striae is a firearms examiner\u0027s comparison companion. A high-severity integrity bypass vulnerability existed in Striae\u0027s digital confirmation workflow prior to v3.0.0. Hash-only validation trusted manifest hash fields that could be modified together with package content, allowing tampered confirmation packages to pass integrity checks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.0.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T16:46:22.132Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/striae-org/striae/security/advisories/GHSA-mmf8-487q-p45m",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/striae-org/striae/security/advisories/GHSA-mmf8-487q-p45m"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/striae-org/striae/releases/tag/v3.0.0",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/striae-org/striae/releases/tag/v3.0.0"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-mmf8-487q-p45m",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Striae has a hash validation utility vulnerability"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-31839",
"datePublished": "2026-03-11T16:46:22.132Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-09T17:41:56.078Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-11T17:07:35.742Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-28498 (GCVE-0-2026-28498)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-16 18:03 – Updated: 2026-08-24 12:07
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Authlib: Fail-Open Cryptographic Verification in OIDC Hash Binding
Summary
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.9, a library-level vulnerability was identified in the Authlib Python library concerning the validation of OpenID Connect (OIDC) ID Tokens. Specifically, the internal hash verification logic (_verify_hash) responsible for validating the at_hash (Access Token Hash) and c_hash (Authorization Code Hash) claims exhibits a fail-open behavior when encountering an unsupported or unknown cryptographic algorithm. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass mandatory integrity protections by supplying a forged ID Token with a deliberately unrecognized alg header parameter. The library intercepts the unsupported state and silently returns True (validation passed), inherently violating fundamental cryptographic design principles and direct OIDC specifications. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.9.
Severity
9.1 (Critical)
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-16 18:14 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
12 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advis… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/b9bb2b2… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.6.9 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28498 | vdb-entryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448182 | issue-trackingx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/v… | x_sadp-csaf-vex |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6309 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6720 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6568 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6497 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6567 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
| https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6912 | vendor-advisoryx_refsource_REDHAT |
Impacted products
10 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| authlib | authlib |
Affected:
< 1.6.9
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 |
Unaffected:
1774417022 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Quay 3.1 |
Unaffected:
1775169155 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Quay 3.12 |
Unaffected:
1775253092 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Quay 3.15 |
Unaffected:
1775169219 , < *
(rpm)
cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8 |
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Quay 3.16 |
Unaffected:
1775069491 , < *
(rpm)
Unaffected: 1775169226 , < * (rpm) cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9 |
|
| Red Hat | Lightspeed Core |
cpe:/a:redhat:lightspeed_core
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Satellite 6 |
cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-28498",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-16T18:14:21.039703Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-16T18:14:42.149Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
},
{
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.6::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1774417022",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.10::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "quay/quay-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.1",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1775169155",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.12::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "quay/quay-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.12",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1775253092",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.15::el8"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "quay/quay-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.15",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1775169219",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:quay:3.16::el9"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "quay/quay-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Quay 3.16",
"vendor": "Red Hat",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1775069491",
"versionType": "rpm"
},
{
"lessThan": "*",
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "1775169226",
"versionType": "rpm"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:lightspeed_core"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack-rhel9",
"product": "Lightspeed Core",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "ansible-automation-platform-25/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel8",
"product": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-mlflow-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-minimal-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-minimal-rocm-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-pytorch-rocm-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-rocm-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "rhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/",
"cpes": [
"cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6"
],
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"packageName": "satellite/foreman-mcp-server-rhel9",
"product": "Red Hat Satellite 6",
"vendor": "Red Hat"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-16T18:03:28.821Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Authlib, a Python library used for building OAuth and OpenID Connect (OIDC) servers. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to bypass critical integrity checks in OIDC ID Tokens. Specifically, the library\u0027s internal hash verification logic fails open when encountering an unsupported cryptographic algorithm, accepting a forged ID Token as valid. This can lead to an authentication bypass, granting unauthorized access to systems relying on Authlib for OIDC authentication."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"namespace": "https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/",
"value": "Important"
},
"type": "Red Hat severity rating"
}
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 9.1,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-325",
"description": "Missing Cryptographic Step",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T12:07:02.013Z",
"orgId": "0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c",
"shortName": "redhat-SADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28498"
},
{
"name": "RHBZ#2448182",
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2448182"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_sadp-csaf-vex"
],
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-28498.json"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6309"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6720"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6568"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6497"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6567"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"x_refsource_REDHAT"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6912"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6309: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6720: Red Hat Quay 3.12"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6568: Red Hat Quay 3.15"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6497: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6567: Red Hat Quay 3.16"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "RHSA-2026:6912: Red Hat Quay 3.1"
}
],
"timeline": [
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-16T19:02:00.128Z",
"value": "Reported to Red Hat."
},
{
"lang": "en",
"time": "2026-03-16T18:03:28.821Z",
"value": "Made public."
}
],
"title": "authlib: Authlib: Authentication bypass via forged OpenID Connect ID Tokens",
"x_adpType": "supplier",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "sadp-cli 1.0.0"
}
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "authlib",
"vendor": "authlib",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.6.9"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.9, a library-level vulnerability was identified in the Authlib Python library concerning the validation of OpenID Connect (OIDC) ID Tokens. Specifically, the internal hash verification logic (_verify_hash) responsible for validating the at_hash (Access Token Hash) and c_hash (Authorization Code Hash) claims exhibits a fail-open behavior when encountering an unsupported or unknown cryptographic algorithm. This flaw allows an attacker to bypass mandatory integrity protections by supplying a forged ID Token with a deliberately unrecognized alg header parameter. The library intercepts the unsupported state and silently returns True (validation passed), inherently violating fundamental cryptographic design principles and direct OIDC specifications. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.9."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-573",
"description": "CWE-573: Improper Following of Specification by Caller",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-16T18:03:28.821Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-m344-f55w-2m6j",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-m344-f55w-2m6j"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/b9bb2b25bf8b7e01512d847a95c1749646eaa72b",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/b9bb2b25bf8b7e01512d847a95c1749646eaa72b"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.6.9",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/authlib/authlib/releases/tag/v1.6.9"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m344-f55w-2m6j",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Authlib: Fail-Open Cryptographic Verification in OIDC Hash Binding"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-28498",
"datePublished": "2026-03-16T18:03:28.821Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-27T20:57:47.708Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-24T12:07:02.013Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-28402 (GCVE-0-2026-28402)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-27 21:08 – Updated: 2026-03-03 20:31
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
nimiq/core-rs-albatross's nimiq-blockchain missing proposal body root verification
Summary
nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.2.2, a malicious or compromised validator that is elected as proposer can publish a macro block proposal where `header.body_root` does not match the actual macro body hash. The proposal can pass proposal verification because the macro proposal verification path validates the header but does not validate the binding `body_root == hash(body)`; later code expects this binding and may panic on mismatch, crashing validators. Note that the impact is only for validator nodes. The patch for this vulnerability is formally released as part of v1.2.2. The patch adds the corresponding body root verification in the proposal checks. No known workarounds are available.
Severity
7.1 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-03-03 20:31 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/securi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3623 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/commit… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releas… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| nimiq | core-rs-albatross |
Affected:
< 1.2.2
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-28402",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-03T20:31:49.868298Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T20:31:59.946Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "core-rs-albatross",
"vendor": "nimiq",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.2.2"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.2.2, a malicious or compromised validator that is elected as proposer can publish a macro block proposal where `header.body_root` does not match the actual macro body hash. The proposal can pass proposal verification because the macro proposal verification path validates the header but does not validate the binding `body_root == hash(body)`; later code expects this binding and may panic on mismatch, crashing validators. Note that the impact is only for validator nodes. The patch for this vulnerability is formally released as part of v1.2.2. The patch adds the corresponding body root verification in the proposal checks. No known workarounds are available."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-27T21:08:53.573Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-7wh6-rmxx-ww47",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-7wh6-rmxx-ww47"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3623",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3623"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/commit/6454c26d966858c5520f55739a30b94c17656c85",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/commit/6454c26d966858c5520f55739a30b94c17656c85"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.2.2",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.2.2"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7wh6-rmxx-ww47",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "nimiq/core-rs-albatross\u0027s nimiq-blockchain missing proposal body root verification"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-28402",
"datePublished": "2026-02-27T21:08:53.573Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-27T15:33:57.289Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-03T20:31:59.946Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-26928 (GCVE-0-2026-26928)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-02 14:01 – Updated: 2026-04-02 14:21
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Lack of Dynamic Library Validation in SzafirHost
Summary
SzafirHost downloads necessary files in the context of the initiating web page. When called, SzafirHost updates its dynamic library. JAR files are correctly verified based on a list of trusted file hashes, and if a file was not on that list, it was checked to see if it had been digitally signed by the vendor. The application doesn't verify hash or vendor's digital signature of uploaded DLL, SO, JNILIB or DYLIB file. The attacker can provide malicious file which will be saved in users /temp folder and executed by the application.
This issue was fixed in version 1.1.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-04-02 14:21 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/posts/2026/04/CVE-2026-26927 | third-party-advisory |
| https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/ | product |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa | SzafirHost |
Affected:
0 , < 1.1.0
(semver)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-26928",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T14:21:35.804676Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-02T14:21:50.711Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "SzafirHost",
"vendor": "Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.1.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Micha\u0142 Leszczy\u0144ski"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "SzafirHost\u0026nbsp;downloads necessary files in the context of the \u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003einitiating web page.\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;When called, SzafirHost updates its dynamic library. JAR files are correctly verified based on a list of trusted file hashes, and if a file was not on that list, it was checked to see if it had been digitally signed by the vendor. The application doesn\u0027t verify hash or vendor\u0027s digital signature of uploaded\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eDLL, SO, JNILIB or DYLIB\u003c/span\u003e file. The attacker can provide malicious file which will be saved in users /temp folder\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgba(221, 223, 228, 0.04);\"\u003eand executed by the application.\u003c/span\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue was fixed in version 1.1.0."
}
],
"value": "SzafirHost\u00a0downloads necessary files in the context of the initiating web page.\u00a0When called, SzafirHost updates its dynamic library. JAR files are correctly verified based on a list of trusted file hashes, and if a file was not on that list, it was checked to see if it had been digitally signed by the vendor. The application doesn\u0027t verify hash or vendor\u0027s digital signature of uploaded\u00a0DLL, SO, JNILIB or DYLIB file. The attacker can provide malicious file which will be saved in users /temp folder\u00a0and executed by the application.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 1.1.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-02T14:01:42.262Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/04/CVE-2026-26927"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Lack of Dynamic Library Validation in SzafirHost",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-26928",
"datePublished": "2026-04-02T14:01:42.262Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-16T09:01:03.143Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-02T14:21:50.711Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-26275 (GCVE-0-2026-26275)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-19 21:25 – Updated: 2026-02-20 15:42
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
httpsig-hyper has Improper Digest Verification that May Allow Message Integrity Bypass
Summary
httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust's `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer.
Severity
7.5 (High)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-02-20 15:32 UTC
Assigner
References
5 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/securit… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/… | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| junkurihara | httpsig-rs |
Affected:
< 0.0.23
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-26275",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-20T15:32:12.586184Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:42:05.498Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "httpsig-rs",
"vendor": "junkurihara",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 0.0.23"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "httpsig-hyper is a hyper extension for http message signatures. An issue was discovered in `httpsig-hyper` prior to version 0.0.23 where Digest header verification could incorrectly succeed due to misuse of Rust\u0027s `matches!` macro. Specifically, the comparison `if matches!(digest, _expected_digest)` treated `_expected_digest` as a pattern binding rather than a value comparison, resulting in unconditional success of the match expression. As a consequence, digest verification could incorrectly return success even when the computed digest did not match the expected value. Applications relying on Digest verification as part of HTTP message signature validation may therefore fail to detect message body modification. The severity depends on how the library is integrated and whether additional signature validation layers are enforced. This issue has been fixed in `httpsig-hyper` 0.0.23. The fix replaces the incorrect `matches!` usage with proper value comparison and additionally introduces constant-time comparison for digest verification as defense-in-depth. Regression tests have also been added to prevent reintroduction of this issue. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to the patched version. There is no reliable workaround without upgrading. Users who cannot immediately upgrade should avoid relying solely on Digest verification for message integrity and ensure that full HTTP message signature verification is enforced at the application layer."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-697",
"description": "CWE-697: Incorrect Comparison",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/security/advisories/GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/14"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/pull/15"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/5533f596c650377e02f4aa9e3eb8dba591b87370"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/junkurihara/httpsig-rs/commit/65cbd19b395180a4bba09a89746c4b14ccb8d297"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-7v42-g35v-xrch",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "httpsig-hyper has Improper Digest Verification that May Allow Message Integrity Bypass"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-26275",
"datePublished": "2026-02-19T21:25:37.335Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-12T17:10:53.413Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-20T15:42:05.498Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-25934 (GCVE-0-2026-25934)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-09 22:13 – Updated: 2026-02-11 21:23
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
go-git improperly verifies data integrity values for .idx and .pack files
Summary
go-git is a highly extensible git implementation library written in pure Go. Prior to 5.16.5, a vulnerability was discovered in go-git whereby data integrity values for .pack and .idx files were not properly verified. This resulted in go-git potentially consuming corrupted files, which would likely result in unexpected errors such as object not found. For context, clients fetch packfiles from upstream Git servers. Those files contain a checksum of their contents, so that clients can perform integrity checks before consuming it. The pack indexes (.idx) are generated locally by go-git, or the git cli, when new .pack files are received and processed. The integrity checks for both files were not being verified correctly. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.16.5.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-02-11 21:23 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/go-git/go-git/security/advisor… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/go-git/go-git/releases/tag/v5.16.5 | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-25934",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-02-11T21:23:04.617787Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-11T21:23:14.781Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "go-git",
"vendor": "go-git",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 5.16.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-git is a highly extensible git implementation library written in pure Go. Prior to 5.16.5, a vulnerability was discovered in go-git whereby data integrity values for .pack and .idx files were not properly verified. This resulted in go-git potentially consuming corrupted files, which would likely result in unexpected errors such as object not found. For context, clients fetch packfiles from upstream Git servers. Those files contain a checksum of their contents, so that clients can perform integrity checks before consuming it. The pack indexes (.idx) are generated locally by go-git, or the git cli, when new .pack files are received and processed. The integrity checks for both files were not being verified correctly. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.16.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-09T22:13:41.974Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-git/go-git/security/advisories/GHSA-37cx-329c-33x3",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-git/go-git/security/advisories/GHSA-37cx-329c-33x3"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/go-git/go-git/releases/tag/v5.16.5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-git/go-git/releases/tag/v5.16.5"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-37cx-329c-33x3",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "go-git improperly verifies data integrity values for .idx and .pack files"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-25934",
"datePublished": "2026-02-09T22:13:41.974Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-02-09T16:22:17.786Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-11T21:23:14.781Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-16317 (GCVE-0-2026-16317)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-21 20:12 – Updated: 2026-07-22 19:41
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Silent Drop of TLS 1.3 Encrypted Records in s2n-tls
Summary
Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag.
This enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.
All TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.
We recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-22 19:31 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper validation of integrity check value
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/releases/tag/v1.7.6 | release-notespatch |
| https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletin… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/security/advisorie… | release-notes |
Impacted products
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-16317",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-22T19:31:33.777230Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T19:41:19.156Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "s2n-tls",
"vendor": "AWS",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.7.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:aws:s2n-tls:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.7.5",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eMissing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAll TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Missing validation of the outer content_type byte on TLS 1.3 encrypted records in s2n-tls allows an active man-in-the-middle to silently discard individual application data records without either endpoint detecting the modification. RFC 8446 Section 5.2 requires that the outer content_type of all encrypted TLS 1.3 records must be application_data (0x17). The s2n-tls AEAD implementation hardcodes this value in the additional authenticated data rather than using the actual wire byte, so the outer content_type is not covered by the authentication tag. \n\n\n\nThis enables selective suppression of application data. In HTTP pipelining scenarios, dropping a TLS record containing an HTTP request can cause request/response desynchronization, where subsequent responses are delivered to the wrong requests. In write-heavy workloads, a dropped record containing a write request can result in undetectable data loss when the client interprets a subsequent success response as confirmation of the dropped write.\n\n\n\nAll TLS 1.3 connections are affected. Both TLS clients and servers are affected. TLS 1.2 and QUIC connections are not affected.\n\n\n\nWe recommend you upgrade s2n-tls to version v1.7.6"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-220",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-220 Client-Server Protocol Manipulation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper validation of integrity check value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-21T20:16:25.683Z",
"orgId": "ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5",
"shortName": "AMZN"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"release-notes",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/releases/tag/v1.7.6"
},
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-062-aws/"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/aws/s2n-tls/security/advisories/GHSA-684c-v35q-fvx7"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Silent Drop of TLS 1.3 Encrypted Records in s2n-tls",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5",
"assignerShortName": "AMZN",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-16317",
"datePublished": "2026-07-21T20:12:48.047Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-20T16:40:27.027Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T19:41:19.156Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-13385 (GCVE-0-2026-13385)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-15 02:01 – Updated: 2026-07-29 19:26
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
An Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value and Improper Certificate Validation in certain ASUS router models allows a remote man-in-the-middle(MITM) user to make the router download and execute arbitrary command via a spoofed server.
Refer to the '
Security Update for ASUS Router Firmware ' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-16 03:55 UTC
CWE
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS | Router |
Affected:
3.0.0.4_386 series
(custom)
Affected: 3.0.0.4_388 series (custom) Affected: 3.0.0.6_102 series (custom) cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.4_386_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.4_388_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.6_102_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-13385",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-16T03:55:23.044266Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:26:45.155Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Router",
"vendor": "ASUS",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0.4_386 series",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0.4_388 series",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "3.0.0.6_102 series",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.4_386_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.4_388_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:asus:router:3.0.0.6_102_series:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "An Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value and Improper Certificate Validation in certain ASUS router models allows a remote man-in-the-middle(MITM) user to make the router download and execute arbitrary command via a spoofed server.\u003cbr\u003eRefer to the \u0027\u0026nbsp;\nSecurity Update for ASUS Router Firmware\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0027 section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information."
}
],
"value": "An Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value and Improper Certificate Validation in certain ASUS router models allows a remote man-in-the-middle(MITM) user to make the router download and execute arbitrary command via a spoofed server.\nRefer to the \u0027\u00a0\nSecurity Update for ASUS Router Firmware\u00a0\u00a0\u0027 section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 9.5,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value (4.20)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-295",
"description": "CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-15T02:01:46.495Z",
"orgId": "54bf65a7-a193-42d2-b1ba-8e150d3c35e1",
"shortName": "ASUS"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.asus.com/security-advisory/"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "54bf65a7-a193-42d2-b1ba-8e150d3c35e1",
"assignerShortName": "ASUS",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-13385",
"datePublished": "2026-07-15T02:01:46.495Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-26T03:42:59.077Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:26:45.155Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-12817 (GCVE-0-2026-12817)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-03 02:54 – Updated: 2026-08-03 15:15
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data
Summary
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: yes
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-03 15:14 UTC
CWE
- CWE-354 - Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value
Assigner
References
2 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%9… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/4b7128198… | patch |
Impacted products
3 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-JAVA |
Affected:
1.74 , < 1.85
(maven)
|
|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-LTS-JAVA |
Affected:
2.73.0 , < 2.73.12
(maven)
|
|
| Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. | BC-FJA |
Affected:
1.0.7 , < 1.0.13
(maven)
Affected: 2.0.0 , < 2.0.13 (maven) Affected: 2.1.0 , < 2.1.13 (maven) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-12817",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-03T15:14:52.626308Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T15:15:27.099Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pg"
],
"packageName": "bcpg",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-jdk18on",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-JAVA",
"programFiles": [
"BcAEADUtil",
"JceAEADUtil"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.85",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.74",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java-lts/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"pg"
],
"packageName": "bcpg-lts8on",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-lts8on",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-LTS-JAVA",
"programFiles": [
"BcAEADUtil",
"JceAEADUtil"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-lts-java",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.73.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.73.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java-fips/",
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "bcpg-fips",
"packageURL": "pkg:maven/org.bouncycastle/bcpg-fips",
"platforms": [
"all"
],
"product": "BC-FJA",
"vendor": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc.",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.7",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.0.0",
"versionType": "maven"
},
{
"lessThan": "2.1.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "2.1.0",
"versionType": "maven"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Alex Gaynor in collaboration with Claude and Anthropic Research"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpg-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series)."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "AMBER",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Amber",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-354",
"description": "CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T05:57:33.979Z",
"orgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"shortName": "bcorg"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%9012817"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/4b712819846ec944379f4909101abac20f0ad4b0"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "OpenPGP AEAD decryption skips final tag on chunk-aligned data",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "bc release-notes template"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630",
"assignerShortName": "bcorg",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-12817",
"datePublished": "2026-08-03T02:54:16.880Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-21T08:58:04.722Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-03T15:15:27.099Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation
Implementation
Ensure that the checksums present in messages are properly checked in accordance with the protocol specification before they are parsed and used.
CAPEC-145: Checksum Spoofing
An adversary spoofs a checksum message for the purpose of making a payload appear to have a valid corresponding checksum. Checksums are used to verify message integrity. They consist of some value based on the value of the message they are protecting. Hash codes are a common checksum mechanism. Both the sender and recipient are able to compute the checksum based on the contents of the message. If the message contents change between the sender and recipient, the sender and recipient will compute different checksum values. Since the sender's checksum value is transmitted with the message, the recipient would know that a modification occurred. In checksum spoofing an adversary modifies the message body and then modifies the corresponding checksum so that the recipient's checksum calculation will match the checksum (created by the adversary) in the message. This would prevent the recipient from realizing that a change occurred.
CAPEC-463: Padding Oracle Crypto Attack
An adversary is able to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key if a target system leaks data on whether or not a padding error happened while decrypting the ciphertext. A target system that leaks this type of information becomes the padding oracle and an adversary is able to make use of that oracle to efficiently decrypt data without knowing the decryption key by issuing on average 128*b calls to the padding oracle (where b is the number of bytes in the ciphertext block). In addition to performing decryption, an adversary is also able to produce valid ciphertexts (i.e., perform encryption) by using the padding oracle, all without knowing the encryption key.
CAPEC-75: Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files
Generally these are manually edited files that are not in the preview of the system administrators, any ability on the attackers' behalf to modify these files, for example in a CVS repository, gives unauthorized access directly to the application, the same as authorized users.