CWE-327
Allowed-with-ReviewUse of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.
987 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-2V8W-CV2X-FJ9V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-04-29 15:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 03:44IBM Runtime Environment, Java Technology Edition IBMJCEPlus and JSSE 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 components could expose sensitive information using a combination of flaws and configurations. IBM X-Force ID: 253188.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-30441"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-04-29T15:15:18Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "IBM Runtime Environment, Java Technology Edition IBMJCEPlus and JSSE 8.0.7.0 through 8.0.7.11 components could expose sensitive information using a combination of flaws and configurations. IBM X-Force ID: 253188.",
"id": "GHSA-2v8w-cv2x-fj9v",
"modified": "2024-04-04T03:44:36Z",
"published": "2023-04-29T15:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30441"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/253188"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6985011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6986617"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6986637"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6987167"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2VXV-GXPX-WC5C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:03 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:03Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability exists in homeLYnk (Wiser For KNX) and spaceLYnk V2.60 and prior that could cause unauthorized access when credentials are discovered after a brute force attack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-22738"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-05-26T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability exists in homeLYnk (Wiser For KNX) and spaceLYnk V2.60 and prior that could cause unauthorized access when credentials are discovered after a brute force attack.",
"id": "GHSA-2vxv-gxpx-wc5c",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:03:17Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:03:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22738"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SEVD-2021-130-04"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-2WMM-3686-65HX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:32 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:32Philips IntelliSpace Portal all versions of 8.0.x, and 7.0.x have a vulnerability using SSL legacy encryption that could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to resources and information.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-5458"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-03-26T14:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Philips IntelliSpace Portal all versions of 8.0.x, and 7.0.x have a vulnerability using SSL legacy encryption that could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to resources and information.",
"id": "GHSA-2wmm-3686-65hx",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:32:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:32:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5458"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/about/customer-support/product-security"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103182"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-2XGQ-Q749-89FQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-18 18:51 – Updated: 2025-12-20 05:35Summary
S3 Encryption Client for Ruby is an open-source client-side encryption library used to facilitate writing and reading encrypted records to S3.
When the encrypted data key (EDK) is stored in an "Instruction File" instead of S3's metadata record, the EDK is exposed to an "Invisible Salamanders" attack (https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/016), which could allow the EDK to be replaced with a new key.
Impact
Background - Key Commitment
There is a cryptographic property whereby under certain conditions, a single ciphertext can be decrypted into 2 different plaintexts by using different encryption keys. To address this issue, strong encryption schemes use what is known as "key commitment", a process by which an encrypted message can only be decrypted by one key; the key used to originally encrypt the message.
In older versions of S3EC, when customers are also using a feature called "Instruction File" to store EDKs, key commitment is not implemented because multiple EDKs could be associated to an underlying encrypted message object. For such customers an attack that leverages the lack of key commitment is possible. A bad actor would need two things to leverage this issue: (i) the ability to create a separate, rogue, EDK that will also decrypt the underlying object to produce desired plaintext, and (ii) permission to upload a new instruction file to the S3 bucket to replace the existing instruction file placed there by the user using the S3C. Any future attempt to decrypt the underlying encrypted message with the S3EC will unwittingly use the rogue EDK to produce a valid plaintext message.
Impacted versions: <= 1.207.0
Patches
We are introducing the concept of "key commitment" to S3EC where the EDK is cryptographically bound to the ciphertext in order to address this issue. In order to maintain compatibility for in-flight messages we are releasing the fix in two versions. A code-compatible minor version that can read messages with key-commitment but not write them, and a new major version that can both read and write messages with key-commitment. For maximum safety customers are asked to upgrade to the latest major version: 1.208.0 or later.
Workarounds
There are no workarounds, please upgrade to the suggested version of S3EC.
References
If customers have any questions or comments about this advisory, AWS SDK for Ruby asks that they contact AWS Security via the issue reporting page or directly via email to aws-security@amazon.com. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "aws-sdk-s3"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.208.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-14762"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-12-18T18:51:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-17T21:15:53Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nS3 Encryption Client for Ruby is an open-source client-side encryption library used to facilitate writing and reading encrypted records to S3. \n\nWhen the encrypted data key (EDK) is stored in an \"Instruction File\" instead of S3\u0027s metadata record, the EDK is exposed to an \"Invisible Salamanders\" attack (https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/016), which could allow the EDK to be replaced with a new key. \n\n\n\n## Impact\n\n### Background - Key Commitment\n\nThere is a cryptographic property whereby under certain conditions, a single ciphertext can be decrypted into 2 different plaintexts by using different encryption keys. To address this issue, strong encryption schemes use what is known as \"key commitment\", a process by which an encrypted message can only be decrypted by one key; the key used to originally encrypt the message. \n\nIn older versions of S3EC, when customers are also using a feature called \"Instruction File\" to store EDKs, key commitment is not implemented because multiple EDKs could be associated to an underlying encrypted message object. For such customers an attack that leverages the lack of key commitment is possible. A bad actor would need two things to leverage this issue: (i) the ability to create a separate, rogue, EDK that will also decrypt the underlying object to produce desired plaintext, and (ii) permission to upload a new instruction file to the S3 bucket to replace the existing instruction file placed there by the user using the S3C. Any future attempt to decrypt the underlying encrypted message with the S3EC will unwittingly use the rogue EDK to produce a valid plaintext message.\n\nImpacted versions: \u003c= 1.207.0\n\n\n\n## Patches\n\nWe are introducing the concept of \"key commitment\" to S3EC where the EDK is cryptographically bound to the ciphertext in order to address this issue. In order to maintain compatibility for in-flight messages we are releasing the fix in two versions. A code-compatible minor version that can read messages with key-commitment but not write them, and a new major version that can both read and write messages with key-commitment. For maximum safety customers are asked to upgrade to the latest major version: 1.208.0 or later.\n\n\n\nWorkarounds\n\nThere are no workarounds, please upgrade to the suggested version of S3EC.\n\nReferences\n\nIf customers have any questions or comments about this advisory, AWS SDK for Ruby asks that they contact AWS Security via the issue reporting page or directly via email to [aws-security@amazon.com](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). Please do not create a public GitHub issue.",
"id": "GHSA-2xgq-q749-89fq",
"modified": "2025-12-20T05:35:01Z",
"published": "2025-12-18T18:51:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/security/advisories/GHSA-2xgq-q749-89fq"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14762"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby/commit/b633ba10cd2fbc4cc770b76ab531ed9647654044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2025-032"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-ruby"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/aws-sdk-s3/CVE-2025-14762.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://rubygems.org/gems/aws-sdk-s3/versions/1.208.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "AWS SDK for Ruby\u0027s S3 Encryption Client has a Key Commitment Issue"
}
GHSA-2XRJ-WRQ4-FF74
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:10 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:10A vulnerability has been identified in SiNVR 3 Central Control Server (CCS) (all versions), SiNVR 3 Video Server (all versions). The streaming service (default port 5410/tcp) of the SiNVR 3 Video Server applies weak cryptography when exposing device (camera) passwords. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read and decrypt the passwords and conduct further attacks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-19299"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-326",
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2020-03-10T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "A vulnerability has been identified in SiNVR 3 Central Control Server (CCS) (all versions), SiNVR 3 Video Server (all versions). The streaming service (default port 5410/tcp) of the SiNVR 3 Video Server applies weak cryptography when exposing device (camera) passwords. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to read and decrypt the passwords and conduct further attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-2xrj-wrq4-ff74",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:10:37Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:10:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19299"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-844761.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-32PM-63J6-22QC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-28 03:31 – Updated: 2025-01-28 18:31Due to reliance on a trivial substitution cipher, sent in cleartext, and the reliance on a default password when the user does not set a password, the Remote Mouse Server by Emote Interactive can be abused by attackers to inject OS commands over theproduct's custom control protocol. A Metasploit module was written and tested against version 4.110, the current version when this CVE was reserved.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3365"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-01-28T01:15:08Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Due to reliance on a trivial substitution cipher, sent in cleartext, and the reliance on a default password when the user does not set a password, the Remote Mouse Server by Emote Interactive can be abused by attackers to inject OS commands over theproduct\u0027s custom control protocol. A Metasploit module was written and tested against version 4.110, the current version when this CVE was reserved.",
"id": "GHSA-32pm-63j6-22qc",
"modified": "2025-01-28T18:31:27Z",
"published": "2025-01-28T03:31:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3365"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/17067"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-332R-78JX-2J2M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-02-21 00:00 – Updated: 2022-04-13 00:01An issue was discovered in Cobbler through 3.3.1. Routines in several files use the HTTP protocol instead of the more secure HTTPS.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-45081"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-02-20T18:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in Cobbler through 3.3.1. Routines in several files use the HTTP protocol instead of the more secure HTTPS.",
"id": "GHSA-332r-78jx-2j2m",
"modified": "2022-04-13T00:01:07Z",
"published": "2022-02-21T00:00:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-45081"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193683"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/cobbler/cobbler/releases"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/18/3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-33CX-2VVQ-MF52
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-05 12:30 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:33Vulnerability in Best Practical Solutions, LLC's Request Tracker v5.0.7, where the Triple DES (3DES) cryptographic algorithm is used within SMIME code to encrypt S/MIME emails. Triple DES is considered obsolete and insecure due to its susceptibility to birthday attacks, which could compromise the confidentiality of encrypted messages.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-2545"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-05-05T12:15:16Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Vulnerability in Best Practical Solutions, LLC\u0027s Request Tracker v5.0.7, where the Triple DES (3DES) cryptographic algorithm is used within SMIME code to encrypt S/MIME emails. Triple DES is considered obsolete and insecure due to its susceptibility to birthday attacks, which could compromise the confidentiality of encrypted messages.",
"id": "GHSA-33cx-2vvq-mf52",
"modified": "2025-11-03T21:33:47Z",
"published": "2025-05-05T12:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-2545"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.bestpractical.com/release-notes/rt/4.4.8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.bestpractical.com/release-notes/rt/5.0.8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00009.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/cryptographic-algorithm-not-recommended-request-tracker-best-practical"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
GHSA-342W-JW3G-59CJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:42 – Updated: 2022-07-13 00:01steghide 0.5.1 relies on a certain 32-bit seed value, which makes it easier for attackers to detect hidden data.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-27211"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-02-15T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "steghide 0.5.1 relies on a certain 32-bit seed value, which makes it easier for attackers to detect hidden data.",
"id": "GHSA-342w-jw3g-59cj",
"modified": "2022-07-13T00:01:12Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:42:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27211"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/StefanoDeVuono/steghide"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/b4shfire/stegcrack"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/projects/steghide/files/steghide/0.5.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165199/Steghide-Hidden-Data-Extraction.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-345R-5QFX-4JPR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-03-29 21:30 – Updated: 2025-02-18 18:33Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 use weak encryption for packet-level security and passwords transferred on the wire.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-28509"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-327"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-03-29T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 use weak encryption for packet-level security and passwords transferred on the wire.",
"id": "GHSA-345r-5qfx-4jpr",
"modified": "2025-02-18T18:33:02Z",
"published": "2023-03-29T21:30:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28509"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2023/03/29/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-rocket-software-unirpc-server-fixed"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Mitigation MIT-24
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis.
- For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification [REF-1192].
- Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak.
- Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
Mitigation MIT-52
Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
Mitigation
Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.
Mitigation MIT-4
Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
- Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.
Mitigation MIT-25
When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
CAPEC-20: Encryption Brute Forcing
An attacker, armed with the cipher text and the encryption algorithm used, performs an exhaustive (brute force) search on the key space to determine the key that decrypts the cipher text to obtain the plaintext.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-475: Signature Spoofing by Improper Validation
An adversary exploits a cryptographic weakness in the signature verification algorithm implementation to generate a valid signature without knowing the key.
CAPEC-608: Cryptanalysis of Cellular Encryption
The use of cryptanalytic techniques to derive cryptographic keys or otherwise effectively defeat cellular encryption to reveal traffic content. Some cellular encryption algorithms such as A5/1 and A5/2 (specified for GSM use) are known to be vulnerable to such attacks and commercial tools are available to execute these attacks and decrypt mobile phone conversations in real-time. Newer encryption algorithms in use by UMTS and LTE are stronger and currently believed to be less vulnerable to these types of attacks. Note, however, that an attacker with a Cellular Rogue Base Station can force the use of weak cellular encryption even by newer mobile devices.
CAPEC-614: Rooting SIM Cards
SIM cards are the de facto trust anchor of mobile devices worldwide. The cards protect the mobile identity of subscribers, associate devices with phone numbers, and increasingly store payment credentials, for example in NFC-enabled phones with mobile wallets. This attack leverages over-the-air (OTA) updates deployed via cryptographically-secured SMS messages to deliver executable code to the SIM. By cracking the DES key, an attacker can send properly signed binary SMS messages to a device, which are treated as Java applets and are executed on the SIM. These applets are allowed to send SMS, change voicemail numbers, and query the phone location, among many other predefined functions. These capabilities alone provide plenty of potential for abuse.
CAPEC-97: Cryptanalysis
Cryptanalysis is a process of finding weaknesses in cryptographic algorithms and using these weaknesses to decipher the ciphertext without knowing the secret key (instance deduction). Sometimes the weakness is not in the cryptographic algorithm itself, but rather in how it is applied that makes cryptanalysis successful. An attacker may have other goals as well, such as: Total Break (finding the secret key), Global Deduction (finding a functionally equivalent algorithm for encryption and decryption that does not require knowledge of the secret key), Information Deduction (gaining some information about plaintexts or ciphertexts that was not previously known) and Distinguishing Algorithm (the attacker has the ability to distinguish the output of the encryption (ciphertext) from a random permutation of bits).