Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-306

Allowed

Missing Authentication for Critical Function

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

API response cwe.mitre.org

The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.

3476 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-JCVQ-626F-F479

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-18 00:30 – Updated: 2026-03-19 15:31
VLAI
Details

IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to view and delete the partners of a community and to delete the communities.

Severity
7.1 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-1264"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-17T23:16:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "IBM Sterling B2B Integrator\u00a0and IBM Sterling File Gateway\u00a06.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5_1, 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1_1, and 6.2.2.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to view and delete the partners of a community and to delete the communities.",
  "id": "GHSA-jcvq-626f-f479",
  "modified": "2026-03-19T15:31:14Z",
  "published": "2026-03-18T00:30:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1264"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7266518"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JCWF-WQ8P-VRQF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-08 18:31 – Updated: 2025-07-08 18:31
VLAI
Details

Missing authentication for critical function in Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-48814"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-08T17:15:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Missing authentication for critical function in Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.",
  "id": "GHSA-jcwf-wq8p-vrqf",
  "modified": "2025-07-08T18:31:45Z",
  "published": "2025-07-08T18:31:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48814"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-48814"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JF63-8279-V8VQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 22:28 – Updated: 2022-05-24 22:28
VLAI
Details

The affected product’s configuration is vulnerable due to missing authentication, which may allow an attacker to change configurations and execute arbitrary code on the iView (versions prior to v5.7.03.6182).

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-32930"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-11T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The affected product\u2019s configuration is vulnerable due to missing authentication, which may allow an attacker to change configurations and execute arbitrary code on the iView (versions prior to v5.7.03.6182).",
  "id": "GHSA-jf63-8279-v8vq",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T22:28:44Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T22:28:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-32930"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ics/advisories/icsa-21-154-01"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-JFV9-68M5-GJJR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-12 18:30 – Updated: 2026-05-28 19:13
VLAI
Summary
mem0 server lacks authentication and authorization controls for its memory management API endpoints
Details

The mem0 1.0.0 server lacks authentication and authorization controls for its memory management API endpoints. Critical functions such as updating memory records (PUT /memories/{memory_id}) are exposed without any verification of the requester's identity or permissions. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending unauthenticated requests to modify, overwrite, or delete arbitrary memory records, leading to unauthorized data manipulation and potential data loss.

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mem0ai"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31240"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-28T19:13:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T18:16:52Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The mem0 1.0.0 server lacks authentication and authorization controls for its memory management API endpoints. Critical functions such as updating memory records (PUT /memories/{memory_id}) are exposed without any verification of the requester\u0027s identity or permissions. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending unauthenticated requests to modify, overwrite, or delete arbitrary memory records, leading to unauthorized data manipulation and potential data loss.",
  "id": "GHSA-jfv9-68m5-gjjr",
  "modified": "2026-05-28T19:13:30Z",
  "published": "2026-05-12T18:30:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31240"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/mem0ai/mem0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.notion.so/CVE-2026-31240-35d1e13931888170964ae035c04a8f18"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "mem0 server lacks authentication and authorization controls for its memory management API endpoints"
}

GHSA-JFWF-28XR-XW6Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 14:45 – Updated: 2026-05-20 01:35
VLAI
Summary
RClone: Unauthenticated operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution
Details

Summary

The RC endpoint operations/fsinfo is exposed without AuthRequired: true and accepts attacker-controlled fs input. Because rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, bearer_token_command is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.

Preconditions

Preconditions for this vulnerability are:

  • The rclone remote control API must be enabled, either by the --rc flag or by running the rclone rcd server
  • The remote control API must be reachable by the attacker - by default rclone only serves the rc to localhost unless the --rc-addr flag is in use
  • The rc must have been deployed without global RC HTTP authentication - so not using --rc-user/--rc-pass/--rc-htpasswd/etc

Details

The root cause consists of the following pieces:

  1. operations/fsinfo is not protected with AuthRequired: true
  2. operations/fsinfo calls rc.GetFs(...) on attacker-controlled input
  3. rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend creation through object-valued fs
  4. WebDAV backend initialization executes bearer_token_command

Relevant code paths:

  • fs/operations/rc.go
  • operations/fsinfo is registered without AuthRequired: true

  • rcFsInfo() calls rc.GetFs(ctx, in)

  • fs/rc/cache.go

  • GetFs() / GetFsNamed() can parse an object-valued fs

  • getConfigMap() converts attacker-controlled JSON into a backend config string

  • backend/webdav/webdav.go

  • bearer_token_command is a supported backend option
  • NewFs(...) calls fetchAndSetBearerToken() when bearer_token_command is set
  • fetchBearerToken() invokes exec.Command(...)

This creates a practical single-request unauthenticated command-execution primitive on reachable RC servers without global HTTP authentication.

This was alidated on: - current master as of 2026-04-14: bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 - latest public release tested locally: v1.73.4

This was also validated on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester, using direct host execution (not containerized PoC execution).

PoC

Minimal single-request form PoC

Start a vulnerable RC server:

rclone rcd --rc-addr 127.0.0.1:5572

No --rc-user, no --rc-pass, no --rc-htpasswd.

Then send a single request:

curl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/operations/fsinfo \
  --data-urlencode "fs=:webdav,url='http://127.0.0.1/',vendor=other,bearer_token_command='/usr/bin/touch /tmp/rclone_fsinfo_rce_poc_marker':"

Expected result: - HTTP 200 JSON response from operations/fsinfo - /tmp/rclone_fsinfo_rce_poc_marker is created on the host

Impact

This is effectively a single-request unauthenticated command-execution vulnerability on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.

In practice, command execution in the rclone process context can lead to higher-impact outcomes such as local file read, file write, or shell access, depending on the deployed environment.

Testing performed

This was successfully reproduced: - on a local test environment - on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester

On the public host it was confirmed:

  • the unauthenticated operations/fsinfo exploit worked
  • command execution occurred on the host
  • the issue was reproducible through direct host execution
Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
9.2 (Critical)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.73.4"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/rclone/rclone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.48.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.73.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-41179"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306",
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-22T14:45:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-23T00:16:45Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nThe RC endpoint `operations/fsinfo` is exposed without `AuthRequired: true` and accepts attacker-controlled `fs` input. Because `rc.GetFs(...)` supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, `bearer_token_command` is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.\n\n### Preconditions\n\nPreconditions for this vulnerability are:\n\n- The rclone remote control API **must** be enabled, either by the `--rc` flag or by running the `rclone rcd` server\n- The remote control API **must** be reachable by the attacker - by default rclone only serves the rc to localhost unless the `--rc-addr` flag is in use\n- The rc must have been deployed **without** global RC HTTP authentication - so not using `--rc-user`/`--rc-pass`/`--rc-htpasswd`/etc\n\n\n### Details\nThe root cause consists of the following pieces:\n\n1. `operations/fsinfo` is not protected with `AuthRequired: true`\n2. `operations/fsinfo` calls `rc.GetFs(...)` on attacker-controlled input\n3. `rc.GetFs(...)` supports inline backend creation through object-valued `fs`\n4. WebDAV backend initialization executes `bearer_token_command`\n\nRelevant code paths:\n\n- [`fs/operations/rc.go`](https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/operations/rc.go)\n  - `operations/fsinfo` is registered without `AuthRequired: true`\n  - `rcFsInfo()` calls `rc.GetFs(ctx, in)`\n\n- [`fs/rc/cache.go`](https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/rc/cache.go)\n  - `GetFs()` / `GetFsNamed()` can parse an object-valued `fs`\n  - `getConfigMap()` converts attacker-controlled JSON into a backend config string\n\n- [`backend/webdav/webdav.go`](https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/backend/webdav/webdav.go)\n  - `bearer_token_command` is a supported backend option\n  - `NewFs(...)` calls `fetchAndSetBearerToken()` when `bearer_token_command` is set\n  - `fetchBearerToken()` invokes `exec.Command(...)`\n\nThis creates a practical single-request unauthenticated command-execution primitive on reachable RC servers without global HTTP authentication.\n\nThis was alidated on:\n- current `master` as of 2026-04-14: `bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82`\n- latest public release tested locally: `v1.73.4`\n\nThis was also validated on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester, using direct host execution (not containerized PoC execution).\n\n### PoC\n#### Minimal single-request form PoC\nStart a vulnerable RC server:\n\n```bash\nrclone rcd --rc-addr 127.0.0.1:5572\n```\n\nNo `--rc-user`, no `--rc-pass`, no `--rc-htpasswd`.\n\nThen send a single request:\n\n```bash\ncurl -sS -X POST http://127.0.0.1:5572/operations/fsinfo \\\n  --data-urlencode \"fs=:webdav,url=\u0027http://127.0.0.1/\u0027,vendor=other,bearer_token_command=\u0027/usr/bin/touch /tmp/rclone_fsinfo_rce_poc_marker\u0027:\"\n```\n\nExpected result:\n- HTTP 200 JSON response from `operations/fsinfo`\n- `/tmp/rclone_fsinfo_rce_poc_marker` is created on the host\n\n### Impact\nThis is effectively a single-request unauthenticated command-execution vulnerability on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication.\n\nIn practice, command execution in the rclone process context can lead to higher-impact outcomes such as local file read, file write, or shell access, depending on the deployed environment.\n\n#### Testing performed\nThis was successfully reproduced:\n- on a local test environment\n- on a public amd64 Ubuntu host controlled by the tester\n\nOn the public host it was confirmed:\n\n- the unauthenticated `operations/fsinfo` exploit worked\n- command execution occurred on the host\n- the issue was reproducible through direct host execution",
  "id": "GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q",
  "modified": "2026-05-20T01:35:40Z",
  "published": "2026-04-22T14:45:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/commit/2a9e952b38e03a96bf40c9eb6e8e22199865ee3b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/backend/webdav/webdav.go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/operations/rc.go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/rc/cache.go"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rclone/rclone/releases/tag/v1.73.5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rclone.org/changelog/#v1-73-5-2026-04-19"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "RClone: Unauthenticated operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution"
}

GHSA-JG59-PR9W-CFR3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:00 – Updated: 2024-04-04 02:37
VLAI
Details

In Progress MOVEit Transfer 11.1 before 11.1.3, a vulnerability has been found that could allow an attacker to sign in without full credentials via the SSH (SFTP) interface. The vulnerability affects only certain SSH (SFTP) configurations, and is applicable only if the MySQL database is being used.

Severity
9.8 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-18465"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-10-31T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In Progress MOVEit Transfer 11.1 before 11.1.3, a vulnerability has been found that could allow an attacker to sign in without full credentials via the SSH (SFTP) interface. The vulnerability affects only certain SSH (SFTP) configurations, and is applicable only if the MySQL database is being used.",
  "id": "GHSA-jg59-pr9w-cfr3",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T02:37:06Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:00:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18465"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.ipswitch.com/s/article/SFTP-Auth-Vulnerability"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.ipswitch.com/MOVEit/Transfer2019_1/ReleaseNotes/en/index.htm#49443.htm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JG6G-FP64-WGX2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-21 21:31 – Updated: 2026-04-21 21:31
VLAI
Details

Vulnerability in the Oracle Identity Manager Connector product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Identity Manager Connector. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Severity
9.1 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-34286"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-21T21:16:33Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in the Oracle Identity Manager Connector product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core).   The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Identity Manager Connector.  Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in  unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data as well as  unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Identity Manager Connector accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts).  CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).",
  "id": "GHSA-jg6g-fp64-wgx2",
  "modified": "2026-04-21T21:31:25Z",
  "published": "2026-04-21T21:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34286"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2026.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JG7F-V8JG-X732

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-09 18:30 – Updated: 2025-12-09 18:30
VLAI
Details

The SAP Internet Communication Framework does not conduct any authentication checks for features that need user identification allowing an attacker to reuse authorization tokens, violating secure authentication practices causing low impact on Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the application.

Severity
6.6 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-42875"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-09T16:17:51Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The SAP Internet Communication Framework does not conduct any authentication checks for features that need user identification allowing an attacker to reuse authorization tokens, violating secure authentication practices causing low impact on Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the application.",
  "id": "GHSA-jg7f-v8jg-x732",
  "modified": "2025-12-09T18:30:37Z",
  "published": "2025-12-09T18:30:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-42875"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3591163"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JG97-797C-2Q53

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-19 18:32 – Updated: 2024-08-19 18:32
VLAI
Details

Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in icegram Icegram allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Icegram: from n/a through 3.1.24.

Severity
5.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-43272"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-08-19T18:15:12Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability in icegram Icegram allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Icegram: from n/a through 3.1.24.",
  "id": "GHSA-jg97-797c-2q53",
  "modified": "2024-08-19T18:32:08Z",
  "published": "2024-08-19T18:32:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43272"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/vulnerability/icegram/wordpress-icegram-engage-plugin-3-1-24-unauthenticated-unpublished-campaign-viewer-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-JGF4-V7WJ-J4RG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:11 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:11
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered on the NEC Aterm WG2600HP2 1.0.2. The router has a set of web service APIs for access to and setup of the configuration. Some APIs don't require authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to retrieve DHCP clients, firmware version, and network status (ex.: curl -X http://[IP]/aterm_httpif.cgi/negotiate -d "REQ_ID=SUPPORT_IF_GET").

Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-12575"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-08-24T19:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered on the NEC Aterm WG2600HP2 1.0.2. The router has a set of web service APIs for access to and setup of the configuration. Some APIs don\u0027t require authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to retrieve DHCP clients, firmware version, and network status (ex.: curl -X http://[IP]/aterm_httpif.cgi/negotiate -d \"REQ_ID=SUPPORT_IF_GET\").",
  "id": "GHSA-jgf4-v7wj-j4rg",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:11:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:11:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-12575"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN38248512/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2018/Aug/26"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}
Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
  • Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port.
  • In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation
Architecture and Design
  • Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks.
  • In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
Mitigation MIT-4.5
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
  • For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
Mitigation
Implementation System Configuration Operation

When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].

CAPEC-12: Choosing Message Identifier

This pattern of attack is defined by the selection of messages distributed via multicast or public information channels that are intended for another client by determining the parameter value assigned to that client. This attack allows the adversary to gain access to potentially privileged information, and to possibly perpetrate other attacks through the distribution means by impersonation. If the channel/message being manipulated is an input rather than output mechanism for the system, (such as a command bus), this style of attack could be used to change the adversary's identifier to more a privileged one.

CAPEC-166: Force the System to Reset Values

An attacker forces the target into a previous state in order to leverage potential weaknesses in the target dependent upon a prior configuration or state-dependent factors. Even in cases where an attacker may not be able to directly control the configuration of the targeted application, they may be able to reset the configuration to a prior state since many applications implement reset functions.

CAPEC-216: Communication Channel Manipulation

An adversary manipulates a setting or parameter on communications channel in order to compromise its security. This can result in information exposure, insertion/removal of information from the communications stream, and/or potentially system compromise.

CAPEC-36: Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality

An adversary searches for and invokes interfaces or functionality that the target system designers did not intend to be publicly available. If interfaces fail to authenticate requests, the attacker may be able to invoke functionality they are not authorized for.

CAPEC-62: Cross Site Request Forgery

An attacker crafts malicious web links and distributes them (via web pages, email, etc.), typically in a targeted manner, hoping to induce users to click on the link and execute the malicious action against some third-party application. If successful, the action embedded in the malicious link will be processed and accepted by the targeted application with the users' privilege level. This type of attack leverages the persistence and implicit trust placed in user session cookies by many web applications today. In such an architecture, once the user authenticates to an application and a session cookie is created on the user's system, all following transactions for that session are authenticated using that cookie including potential actions initiated by an attacker and simply "riding" the existing session cookie.

← Back to the CWE list