Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-305

Allowed

Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness

Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft

The authentication algorithm is sound, but the implemented mechanism can be bypassed as the result of a separate weakness that is primary to the authentication error.

300 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-FF32-CMVQ-X6C5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-09 09:31 – Updated: 2025-01-09 15:31
VLAI
Details

SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-12802"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-09T09:15:06Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "SSL-VPN MFA Bypass in SonicWALL SSL-VPN can arise in specific cases due to the separate handling of UPN (User Principal Name) and SAM (Security Account Manager) account names when integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, allowing MFA to be configured independently for each login method and potentially enabling attackers to bypass MFA by exploiting the alternative account name.",
  "id": "GHSA-ff32-cmvq-x6c5",
  "modified": "2025-01-09T15:31:51Z",
  "published": "2025-01-09T09:31:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12802"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0001"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-FM3M-JRGM-5PPG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-08-04 20:46 – Updated: 2025-08-06 14:12
VLAI
Summary
RatPanel can perform remote command execution without authorization
Details

Summary

  • When an attacker obtains the backend login path of RatPanel (including but not limited to weak default paths, brute-force cracking, etc.), they can execute system commands or take over hosts managed by the panel without logging in.
  • In addition to this remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, the flawed code also leads to unauthorized access.

Details

In Go, r.URL.Path retrieves the part of the URL that comes after the port and before the query parameters or anchor symbols. For example, in the URL http://localhost:8080/api/ws/ssh?id=1, the retrieved path would be /api/ws/ssh.

However, if the request is made to http://localhost:8080//api/ws/ssh?id=1, the parsed r.URL.Path would be //api/ws/ssh.

RatPanel uses the CleanPath middleware provided by github.com/go-chi/chi package to clean URLs, The route path inside the chi router will be cleaned to /api/ws/ssh, but this middleware does not process r.URL.Path, so the path is still //api/ws/ssh.

image

In the must_login middleware, RatPanel uses r.URL.Path to match the hard-coded prefix whitelist, because /api/ws does not match //api/ws. The must_login middleware will allow the request, but //api/ws has been cleaned to /api/ws in the chi router. This inconsistency leads to authentication bypass and accessing the dangerous interfaces such as /api/ws/exec and /api/ws/ssh.

image-20250706193354738

But there are some limitations. Before exploiting this interface, the attacker must first identify the correct backend address of ratpanel to activate session legitimacy—specifically, to ensure sess.Put("verify_entrance", true). That said, accessing /api/ws only requires activating the session and does not require completing further authentication or login steps. Therefore, this is assessed to be a remotely exploitable command execution vulnerability with moderate severity.

PoC

I first carried session=......, accessed the backend login page normally(without completing the authentication process), activated the session, and then used the _wsdump.py script provided by the Python websocket-client library to complete the authentication and exploit the vulnerability.

image-20250706202209133 image-20250706202330056 image-20250706202450433

Because of the authorization code

// internal/http/middleware/must_login.go
if slices.Contains(whiteList, r.URL.Path) || !strings.HasPrefix(r.URL.Path, "/api") {
    next.ServeHTTP(w, r)
    return
}

This vulnerability affects the authorization mechanism across all APIs, for example

image-20250706204411739 image-20250706204429581

This authentication vulnerability appears to affect versions v2.3.19 to v2.5.5.


Data packet

GET //api/...... HTTP/2
Host: IP:PORT
Cookie: session=XXXXXX
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.8,zh-TW;q=0.7,zh-HK;q=0.5,en-US;q=0.3,en;q=0.2
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
Connection: close


python _wsdump.py wss://ip:port//api/ws/exec --headers "Cookie: session=xxxxxx" -n

Impact

Users running Ratpanel versions v2.3.19 to v2.5.5—especially those who have exposed their admin panel login URL or use weak login URL paths—are vulnerable to unauthorized access. Additionally, versions v2.5.1 to v2.5.5 are susceptible to server and hosted machine takeover.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/tnborg/panel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.3.19"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.5.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/tnborg/panel"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-20241111062800-91ecd04c2700"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.0.0-20250707071915-4985eb2e1f38"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-53534"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22",
      "CWE-305",
      "CWE-436"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-08-04T20:46:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-05T21:15:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n* When an attacker obtains the backend login path of RatPanel (including but not limited to weak default paths, brute-force cracking, etc.), they can execute system commands or take over hosts managed by the panel **without logging in**.\n* In addition to this **remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability**, the flawed code also leads to **unauthorized access**.\n\n### Details\n\nIn Go, `r.URL.Path` retrieves the part of the URL that comes after the port and before the query parameters or anchor symbols. For example, in the URL `http://localhost:8080/api/ws/ssh?id=1`, the retrieved path would be `/api/ws/ssh`.\n\nHowever, if the request is made to `http://localhost:8080//api/ws/ssh?id=1`, the parsed `r.URL.Path` would be `//api/ws/ssh`. \n\nRatPanel uses the `CleanPath` middleware provided by `github.com/go-chi/chi` package to clean URLs, The route path inside the chi router will be cleaned to `/api/ws/ssh`, but this middleware does not process `r.URL.Path`, so the path is still `//api/ws/ssh`.\n\n![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/788a7263-38f6-4b74-aa4a-b935239362f7)\n\nIn the `must_login` middleware, RatPanel uses `r.URL.Path` to match the hard-coded prefix whitelist, because `/api/ws` does not match `//api/ws`. The `must_login` middleware will allow the request, but `//api/ws` has been cleaned to `/api/ws` in the chi router. This inconsistency leads to authentication bypass and accessing the dangerous interfaces such as `/api/ws/exec` and `/api/ws/ssh`.\n\n![image-20250706193354738](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0be46a5-9e82-4623-9b21-7247798a3c98)\n\nBut there are some limitations. Before exploiting this interface, the attacker must first identify the correct backend address of ratpanel to activate session legitimacy\u2014specifically, to ensure `sess.Put(\"verify_entrance\", true)`. That said, accessing `/api/ws` only requires activating the session and does not require completing further authentication or login steps. Therefore, this is assessed to be a remotely exploitable command execution vulnerability with moderate severity.\n\n\n### PoC\n\nI first carried `session=......`, accessed the backend login page normally` (without completing the authentication process)`, activated the session, and then used the [_wsdump.py](https://github.com/websocket-client/websocket-client/blob/master/websocket/_wsdump.py) script provided by the Python websocket-client library to complete the authentication and exploit the vulnerability.\n\n![image-20250706202209133](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89849095-8d90-465b-8d67-91b49e61c7bf)\n![image-20250706202330056](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6188f519-13f7-4ca9-84ef-f743bda55ae2)\n![image-20250706202450433](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76e4f8f3-ad67-4295-ab83-6ec910f7449d)\n\nBecause of the authorization code\n\n```golang\n// internal/http/middleware/must_login.go\nif slices.Contains(whiteList, r.URL.Path) || !strings.HasPrefix(r.URL.Path, \"/api\") {\n    next.ServeHTTP(w, r)\n    return\n}\n```\n\nThis vulnerability affects the authorization mechanism across all APIs, for example\n\n![image-20250706204411739](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5da63d83-2652-4275-8a80-c7878de62f5c)\n![image-20250706204429581](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d83a323a-a98e-4ec0-9480-06e0d8670513)\n\nThis authentication vulnerability appears to affect versions **v2.3.19 to v2.5.5**.\n\n---\n\nData packet\n\n```text\nGET //api/...... HTTP/2\nHost: IP:PORT\nCookie: session=XXXXXX\nAccept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.8,zh-TW;q=0.7,zh-HK;q=0.5,en-US;q=0.3,en;q=0.2\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\nContent-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8\nConnection: close\n\n\n```\n\n```cmd\npython _wsdump.py wss://ip:port//api/ws/exec --headers \"Cookie: session=xxxxxx\" -n\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nUsers running Ratpanel versions v2.3.19 to v2.5.5\u2014especially those who have exposed their admin panel login URL or use weak login URL paths\u2014are vulnerable to unauthorized access. Additionally, versions v2.5.1 to v2.5.5 are susceptible to server and hosted machine takeover.",
  "id": "GHSA-fm3m-jrgm-5ppg",
  "modified": "2025-08-06T14:12:21Z",
  "published": "2025-08-04T20:46:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel/security/advisories/GHSA-fm3m-jrgm-5ppg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53534"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel/commit/4985eb2e1f388ecd6faf331941c13cb97368ec1d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel/commit/91ecd04c270061429f9df5ec19cd6b96a9f595f2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel/commit/ed5c74c7534230ba685273504af4c1e1e3598ff1"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/tnborg/panel/releases/tag/v2.5.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "RatPanel can perform remote command execution without authorization"
}

GHSA-FPM5-2WCJ-VFR7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-06 15:57 – Updated: 2025-11-15 03:17
VLAI
Summary
codechecker authentication method confusion vulnerability allows logging in as the built-in root user from an external service
Details

Summary

Authentication method confusion allows logging in as the built-in root user from an external service. The built-in root user is generated in a weak manner, cannot be disabled, and has universal access.

Details

Until CodeChecker version 6.24.1 there was an auto-generated super-user account that could not be disabled. The attacker needs to know only the username of the root user.

This root user is unconditionally assigned superuser permissions.

Which means that if any user via any service logs in with the root user's username, they will unconditionally have superuser permissions on the CodeChecker instance.

The name of the user name can be found in root.user file in the CodeChecker configuration directory. You can check if you are impacted by checking the existence of this user in the external authentication services (e.g. LDAP, PAM etc.).

Impact

This vulnerability allows an attacker who can create an account on an enabled external authentication service, to log in as the root user, and access and control everything that can be controlled via the web interface. The attacker needs to acquire the username of the root user to be successful.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.24.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "codechecker"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.24.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-10082"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-11-06T15:57:57Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-06T15:15:11Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nAuthentication method confusion allows logging in as the built-in root user from an external service. The built-in root user is generated in a weak manner, cannot be disabled, and has universal access. \n\n### Details\nUntil CodeChecker version 6.24.1 there was an auto-generated super-user account that could not be disabled.\nThe attacker needs to know only the username of the root user.\n\nThis root user is unconditionally assigned superuser permissions.\n\nWhich means that if any user via any service logs in with the root user\u0027s username, they will unconditionally have superuser permissions on the CodeChecker instance.\n\nThe name of the user name can be found in `root.user` file in the CodeChecker configuration directory.\nYou can check if you are impacted by checking the existence of this user in the external authentication services (e.g. LDAP, PAM etc.).\n\n### Impact\nThis vulnerability allows an attacker who can create an account on an enabled external authentication service, to log in as the root user, and access and control everything that can be controlled via the web interface.\nThe attacker needs to acquire the username of the root user to be successful.",
  "id": "GHSA-fpm5-2wcj-vfr7",
  "modified": "2025-11-15T03:17:21Z",
  "published": "2024-11-06T15:57:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/security/advisories/GHSA-fpm5-2wcj-vfr7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-10082"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker/commit/866f3796d01f3158c49b87ccae3e09c0807c1c7b"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Ericsson/codechecker"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/codechecker/PYSEC-2024-183.yaml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "codechecker authentication method confusion vulnerability allows logging in as the built-in root user from an external service"
}

GHSA-FR2G-9HJM-WR23

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-10-19 16:13 – Updated: 2023-10-31 22:24
VLAI
Summary
NATS.io: Adding accounts for just the system account adds auth bypass
Details

Background

NATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.

NATS users exist within accounts, and once using accounts, the old authorization block is not applicable.

Problem Description

Without any authorization rules in the nats-server, users can connect without authentication.

Before nats-server 2.2.0, all authentication and authorization rules for a nats-server lived in an "authorization" block, defining users. With nats-server 2.2.0 all users live inside accounts. When using the authorization block, whose syntax predates this, those users will be placed into the implicit global account, "$G". Users inside accounts go into the newer "accounts" block.

If an "accounts" block is defined, in simple deployment scenarios this is often used only to enable client access to the system account. When the only account added is the system account "$SYS", the nats-server would create an implicit user in "$G" and set it as the no_auth_user account, enabling the same "without authentication" logic as without any rules.

This preserved the ability to connect simply, and then add one authenticated login for system access.

But with an "authorization" block, this is wrong. Users exist in the global account, with login rules. And in simple testing, they might still connect fine without administrators seeing that authentication has been disabled.

The blind-spot on our part came from encouraging and documenting a switch to using only "accounts", instead of "authorization".

In the fixed versions, using an "authorization" block will inhibit the implicit creation of a "$G" user and setting it as the no_auth_user target. In unfixed versions, just creating a second account, with no users, will also inhibit this behavior.

Affected versions

NATS Server: * 2.2.0 up to and including 2.9.22 and 2.10.1 * Fixed with nats-io/nats-server: 2.10.2 and backported to 2.9.23

Workarounds

In the "accounts" block, define a second non-system account, leave it empty.

accounts {
    SYS: {
        users: [
            { user: sysuser, password: makemeasandwich }
        ]
    }
    DUMMY: {}  # for security, before 2.10.2
}
system_account: SYS

Solution

Any one of these:

  1. Upgrade the NATS server to at least 2.10.2 (or 2.9.23)
  2. Or define a dummy account
  3. Or complete the migration of authorization entries to be inside a named account in the "accounts" block

Credits

Problem reported by Alex Herrington.
Addressed publicly in a GitHub Discussion prior to this advisory.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.2.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.9.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.10.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.10.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-47090"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-19T16:13:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Background\n\nNATS.io is a high performance open source pub-sub distributed communication technology, built for the cloud, on-premise, IoT, and edge computing.\n\nNATS users exist within accounts, and once using accounts, the old authorization block is not applicable.\n\n\n## Problem Description\n\nWithout any authorization rules in the nats-server, users can connect without authentication.\n\nBefore nats-server 2.2.0, all authentication and authorization rules for a nats-server lived in an \"authorization\" block, defining users.  With nats-server 2.2.0 all users live inside accounts.  When using the authorization block, whose syntax predates this, those users will be placed into the implicit global account, \"$G\".  Users inside accounts go into the newer \"accounts\" block.\n\nIf an \"accounts\" block is defined, in simple deployment scenarios this is often used only to enable client access to the system account.  When the only account added is the system account \"$SYS\", the nats-server would create an implicit user in \"$G\" and set it as the `no_auth_user` account, enabling the same \"without authentication\" logic as without any rules.\n\nThis preserved the ability to connect simply, and then add one authenticated login for system access.\n\nBut with an \"authorization\" block, this is wrong.  Users exist in the global account, with login rules.  And in simple testing, they might still connect fine without administrators seeing that authentication has been disabled.\n\nThe blind-spot on our part came from encouraging and documenting a switch to using only \"accounts\", instead of \"authorization\".\n\nIn the fixed versions, using an \"authorization\" block will inhibit the implicit creation of a \"$G\" user and setting it as the `no_auth_user` target.  In unfixed versions, just creating a second account, with no users, will also inhibit this behavior.\n\n\n## Affected versions\n\nNATS Server:\n * 2.2.0 up to and including 2.9.22 and 2.10.1\n * Fixed with nats-io/nats-server: 2.10.2 and backported to 2.9.23\n\n\n## Workarounds\n\nIn the \"accounts\" block, define a second non-system account, leave it empty.\n\n    accounts {\n        SYS: {\n            users: [\n                { user: sysuser, password: makemeasandwich }\n            ]\n        }\n        DUMMY: {}  # for security, before 2.10.2\n    }\n    system_account: SYS\n\n\n## Solution\n\nAny one of these:\n\n 1. Upgrade the NATS server to at least 2.10.2 (or 2.9.23)\n 2. Or define a dummy account\n 3. Or complete the migration of authorization entries to be inside a named account in the \"accounts\" block\n\n\n## Credits\n\nProblem reported by Alex Herrington.  \nAddressed publicly in a GitHub Discussion prior to this advisory.",
  "id": "GHSA-fr2g-9hjm-wr23",
  "modified": "2023-10-31T22:24:58Z",
  "published": "2023-10-19T16:13:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/security/advisories/GHSA-fr2g-9hjm-wr23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/pull/4605"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/commit/fa5b7afcb64e7e887e49afdd032358802b5c4478"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://advisories.nats.io/CVE/secnote-2023-01.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/discussions/4535"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/releases/tag/v2.10.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/releases/tag/v2.9.23"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "NATS.io: Adding accounts for just the system account adds auth bypass"
}

GHSA-FV4Q-WM8C-WJG4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:02 – Updated: 2023-09-26 19:52
VLAI
Summary
Keycloak Authentication Error
Details

A vulnerability was found in Keycloak 7.x where the user federation LDAP bind type is none (LDAP anonymous bind), any password, invalid or valid will be accepted.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-parent"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.0.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "7.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-14909"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-18T22:03:15Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2019-12-04T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was found in Keycloak 7.x where the user federation LDAP bind type is none (LDAP anonymous bind), any password, invalid or valid will be accepted.",
  "id": "GHSA-fv4q-wm8c-wjg4",
  "modified": "2023-09-26T19:52:42Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:02:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-14909"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-14909"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14909"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak Authentication Error"
}

GHSA-G28R-W65R-H89M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-03-19 00:00 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:30
VLAI
Details

OpenVPN 2.1 until v2.4.12 and v2.5.6 may enable authentication bypass in external authentication plug-ins when more than one of them makes use of deferred authentication replies, which allows an external user to be granted access with only partially correct credentials.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-0547"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-03-18T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "OpenVPN 2.1 until v2.4.12 and v2.5.6 may enable authentication bypass in external authentication plug-ins when more than one of them makes use of deferred authentication replies, which allows an external user to be granted access with only partially correct credentials.",
  "id": "GHSA-g28r-w65r-h89m",
  "modified": "2025-11-03T21:30:38Z",
  "published": "2022-03-19T00:00:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-0547"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/CVE-2022-0547"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/SecurityAnnouncements"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00002.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00005.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GFXJ35WKPME4HYNQCQNAJHLCZOJL2SAE"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R36OYC5SJ6FLPVAYJYYT4MOJ2I7MGYFF"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GFXJ35WKPME4HYNQCQNAJHLCZOJL2SAE"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R36OYC5SJ6FLPVAYJYYT4MOJ2I7MGYFF"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://openvpn.net/community-downloads"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G394-QPX6-X7RR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-20 12:32 – Updated: 2025-03-20 12:32
VLAI
Details

In langgenius/dify v0.10.1, the /forgot-password/resets endpoint does not verify the password reset code, allowing an attacker to reset the password of any user, including administrators. This vulnerability can lead to a complete compromise of the application.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-12776"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-20T10:15:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In langgenius/dify v0.10.1, the `/forgot-password/resets` endpoint does not verify the password reset code, allowing an attacker to reset the password of any user, including administrators. This vulnerability can lead to a complete compromise of the application.",
  "id": "GHSA-g394-qpx6-x7rr",
  "modified": "2025-03-20T12:32:43Z",
  "published": "2025-03-20T12:32:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12776"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/00a8b403-7da5-431e-afa3-40339cf734bf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-G9GM-JGPX-56QM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-15 15:30 – Updated: 2024-11-15 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability in the external authentication mechanism of Cisco Modeling Labs could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access the web interface with administrative privileges.

This vulnerability is due to the improper handling of certain messages that are returned by the associated external authentication server. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the web interface of an affected server. Under certain conditions, the authentication mechanism would be bypassed and the attacker would be logged in as an administrator. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain administrative privileges on the web interface of an affected server, including the ability to access and modify every simulation and all user-created data. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid user credentials that are stored on the associated external authentication server. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-20154"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-15T15:15:05Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability in the external authentication mechanism of Cisco Modeling Labs could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access the web interface with administrative privileges.\n\nThis vulnerability is due to the improper handling of certain messages that are returned by the associated external authentication server. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the web interface of an affected server. Under certain conditions, the authentication mechanism would be bypassed and the attacker would be logged in as an administrator. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain administrative privileges on the web interface of an affected server, including the ability to access and modify every simulation and all user-created data. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid user credentials that are stored on the associated external authentication server.\nCisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-g9gm-jgpx-56qm",
  "modified": "2024-11-15T15:30:57Z",
  "published": "2024-11-15T15:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-20154"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cml-auth-bypass-4fUCCeG5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GF4F-G545-P55P

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-13 15:34 – Updated: 2026-08-13 15:34
VLAI
Details

Passkey entry Bluetooth LE legacy pairing can be bypassed in the RS9116W and SiWx917 by manipulating the temporary key value.  See vulnerability B-E3 in the related paper below.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-65935"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-13T15:19:56Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Passkey entry Bluetooth LE legacy pairing can be bypassed in the RS9116W and SiWx917 by manipulating the temporary key value.\u00a0\nSee vulnerability B-E3 in the related paper below.",
  "id": "GHSA-gf4f-g545-p55p",
  "modified": "2026-08-13T15:34:43Z",
  "published": "2026-08-13T15:34:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-65935"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.02905"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://community.silabs.com/068Vm00000x0Yqy"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-GFP3-9J64-8W7J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-14 00:30 – Updated: 2025-02-14 00:30
VLAI
Details

ZF Roll Stability Support Plus (RSSPlus) is vulnerable to an authentication bypass vulnerability targeting deterministic RSSPlus SecurityAccess service seeds, which may allow an attacker to remotely (proximal/adjacent with RF equipment or via pivot from J2497 telematics devices) call diagnostic functions intended for workshop or repair scenarios. This can impact system availability, potentially degrading performance or erasing software, however the vehicle remains in a safe vehicle state.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-12054"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-305"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-13T23:15:09Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "ZF Roll Stability Support Plus (RSSPlus) \nis vulnerable to an authentication bypass vulnerability targeting \ndeterministic RSSPlus SecurityAccess service seeds, which may allow an \nattacker to remotely (proximal/adjacent with RF equipment or via pivot \nfrom J2497 telematics devices) call diagnostic functions intended for \nworkshop or repair scenarios. This can impact system availability, \npotentially degrading performance or erasing software, however the \nvehicle remains in a safe vehicle state.",
  "id": "GHSA-gfp3-9j64-8w7j",
  "modified": "2025-02-14T00:30:44Z",
  "published": "2025-02-14T00:30:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12054"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://nmfta.org/wp-content/media/2022/11/Actionable_Mitigations_Options_v9_DIST.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-25-021-03"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

No mitigation information available for this CWE.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.