CWE-290
AllowedAuthentication Bypass by Spoofing
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks.
1004 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-W4W5-G48Q-278G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-21 06:31 – Updated: 2025-12-21 06:31Yealink RPS before 2025-06-27 allows unauthorized access to information, including AutoP URL addresses. This was fixed by deploying an enhanced authentication mechanism through a security update to all cloud instances.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68644"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-21T04:16:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Yealink RPS before 2025-06-27 allows unauthorized access to information, including AutoP URL addresses. This was fixed by deploying an enhanced authentication mechanism through a security update to all cloud instances.",
"id": "GHSA-w4w5-g48q-278g",
"modified": "2025-12-21T06:31:11Z",
"published": "2025-12-21T06:31:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68644"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.yealink.com/en/trust-center/security-bulletins/yealink-unauthorized-access-to-rps-vulnerability"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.yealink.com/website-service/download/Yealink_RPS_Security_Remediation_Verification_Report.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W56W-W5XR-Q52M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-10 21:31 – Updated: 2025-03-11 21:30Certain crafted MIME email messages that claimed to contain an encrypted OpenPGP message, which instead contained an OpenPGP signed message, were wrongly shown as being encrypted. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 136 and Thunderbird < 128.8.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-26696"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-10T19:15:40Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Certain crafted MIME email messages that claimed to contain an encrypted OpenPGP message, which instead contained an OpenPGP signed message, were wrongly shown as being encrypted. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird \u003c 136 and Thunderbird \u003c 128.8.",
"id": "GHSA-w56w-w5xr-q52m",
"modified": "2025-03-11T21:30:34Z",
"published": "2025-03-10T21:31:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-26696"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1864205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-17"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2025-18"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W59W-35Q3-VCG7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-04 09:30 – Updated: 2025-01-24 18:31By default the CloudStack management server honours the x-forwarded-for HTTP header and logs it as the source IP of an API request. This could lead to authentication bypass and other operational problems should an attacker decide to spoof their IP address this way. Users are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.18.1.1 or 4.19.0.1, which fixes this issue.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-29006"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-04-04T08:15:06Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "By default the CloudStack management server honours the x-forwarded-for HTTP header and logs it as the source IP of an API request. This could lead to authentication bypass and other operational problems should an attacker decide to spoof their IP address this way. Users are recommended to upgrade to CloudStack version 4.18.1.1 or 4.19.0.1, which fixes this issue.\n\n",
"id": "GHSA-w59w-35q3-vcg7",
"modified": "2025-01-24T18:31:08Z",
"published": "2024-04-04T09:30:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-29006"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/82f46pv7mvh95ybto5hn8wlo6g8jhjvp"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W5WR-PV9P-HFHR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-06-13 12:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 04:46Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in the password reset process of Pandora FMS allows an unauthenticated attacker to initiate a password reset process for any user account without proper authentication. This issue affects PandoraFMS v771 and prior versions on all platforms.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-2807"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-06-13T12:15:09Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in the password reset process of Pandora FMS allows an unauthenticated attacker to initiate a password reset process for any user account without proper authentication. This issue affects PandoraFMS v771 and prior versions on all platforms.",
"id": "GHSA-w5wr-pv9p-hfhr",
"modified": "2024-04-04T04:46:29Z",
"published": "2023-06-13T12:30:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2807"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pandorafms.com/en/security/common-vulnerabilities-and-exposures"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-W64R-2G3W-W8W4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-29 20:40 – Updated: 2025-10-23 20:33Summary
AgentAPI prior to version 0.4.0 was susceptible to a client-side DNS rebinding attack when hosted over plain HTTP on localhost.
Impact
An attacker could have gained access to the /messages endpoint served by the Agent API. This allowed for the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive user data, specifically local message history, which could've included secret keys, file system contents, and intellectual property the user was working on locally.
Remediation
We've implemented an Origin and Host header validating middleware and set a secure by default configuration.
Please upgrade to version 0.4.0 or later.
Credits
We'd like to thank Evan Harris from mcpsec.dev for reporting this issue and following the coordinated disclosure policy.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/coder/agentapi"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.4.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-59956"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290",
"CWE-350"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-09-29T20:40:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-09-30T11:37:41Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nAgentAPI prior to version [0.4.0](https://github.com/coder/agentapi/releases/tag/v0.4.0) was susceptible to a client-side DNS rebinding attack when hosted over plain HTTP on localhost.\n\n### Impact\nAn attacker could have gained access to the `/messages` endpoint served by the Agent API. This allowed for the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive user data, specifically local message history, which could\u0027ve included secret keys, file system contents, and intellectual property the user was working on locally.\n\n### Remediation\nWe\u0027ve [implemented](https://github.com/coder/agentapi/pull/49) an `Origin` and `Host` header validating middleware and set a secure by default configuration.\n\nPlease upgrade to version [0.4.0](https://github.com/coder/agentapi/releases/tag/v0.4.0) or later.\n\n### Credits\nWe\u0027d like to thank [Evan Harris](https://github.com/eharris128) from [mcpsec.dev](https://mcpsec.dev/) for reporting this issue and following the coordinated disclosure [policy](https://coder.com/security/policy).",
"id": "GHSA-w64r-2g3w-w8w4",
"modified": "2025-10-23T20:33:23Z",
"published": "2025-09-29T20:40:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/coder/agentapi/security/advisories/GHSA-w64r-2g3w-w8w4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59956"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/coder/agentapi/pull/49"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/coder/agentapi/commit/5c425c62447b8a9eac19e9fc5a2eae7f0803f149"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.blog/security/application-security/localhost-dangers-cors-and-dns-rebinding"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/coder/agentapi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/coder/agentapi/releases/tag/v0.4.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mcpsec.dev/advisories/2025-09-19-coder-chat-exfiltration"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3991"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Coder AgentAPI exposed user chat history via a DNS rebinding attack"
}
GHSA-W6J9-VW59-27WV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-22 17:09 – Updated: 2026-07-21 13:16Summary
When ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION is enabled, Gogs accepts the configured authentication header (default: X-WEBAUTH-USER) directly from client requests without validating that the request originated from a trusted reverse proxy. Any remote attacker who can reach the Gogs service can forge this header to impersonate any user or trigger automatic account creation, completely bypassing authentication.
Root Cause
The vulnerability exists because Gogs reads the authentication header directly from the incoming HTTP request without any verification that the header was set by a trusted reverse proxy.
Vulnerable Code Flow
In internal/context/auth.go lines 206-234:
func authenticatedUser(store AuthStore, ctx *macaron.Context, sess session.Store) (_ *database.User, isBasicAuth, isTokenAuth bool) {
// ... existing auth checks ...
if uid <= 0 {
if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAuthentication {
// Reads header DIRECTLY from client request - NO VALIDATION!
webAuthUser := ctx.Req.Header.Get(conf.Auth.ReverseProxyAuthenticationHeader)
if len(webAuthUser) > 0 {
user, err := store.GetUserByUsername(ctx.Req.Context(), webAuthUser)
if err != nil {
if !database.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
log.Error("Failed to get user by name: %v", err)
return nil, false, false
}
// Check if enabled auto-registration.
if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAutoRegistration {
// Creates new user with forged username!
user, err = store.CreateUser(
ctx.Req.Context(),
webAuthUser,
gouuid.NewV4().String()+"@localhost",
database.CreateUserOptions{
Activated: true,
},
)
if err != nil {
log.Error("Failed to create user %q: %v", webAuthUser, err)
return nil, false, false
}
}
}
// Returns user as authenticated without any verification!
return user, false, false
}
}
// ... fallback to basic auth ...
}
// ...
}
The code has zero validation that: 1. The request came through a reverse proxy 2. The header was set by the proxy (not the client) 3. Gogs is actually behind a reverse proxy 4. The direct access to Gogs is restricted
The vulnerability occurs when:
- Gogs is publicly accessible (e.g., 0.0.0.0:3000)
- ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = true
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites
Gogs instance with the following configuration in custom/conf/app.ini:
[auth]
ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = true
An attacker can impersonate any user including administrators:
# Become admin instantly
curl http://gogs.example.com/ -H "X-WEBAUTH-USER: <username>"
Recommended Fixes
Add validation to ensure headers come from trusted sources:
func authenticatedUser(store AuthStore, ctx *macaron.Context, sess session.Store) (_ *database.User, isBasicAuth, isTokenAuth bool) {
// ... existing code ...
if uid <= 0 {
if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAuthentication {
// Validate request is from trusted proxy
if !isRequestFromTrustedProxy(ctx.Req) {
log.Warn("Reverse proxy auth header received from untrusted source: %s", ctx.RemoteAddr())
return nil, false, false
}
webAuthUser := ctx.Req.Header.Get(conf.Auth.ReverseProxyAuthenticationHeader)
// ... rest of the code ...
}
}
// ...
}
// New validation function
func isRequestFromTrustedProxy(req *http.Request) bool {
// Check if request is from localhost/trusted IPs
remoteIP := getRemoteIP(req)
// Only accept from localhost by default
if remoteIP.IsLoopback() {
return true
}
// Check against configured trusted proxy IPs
for _, trustedIP := range conf.Auth.TrustedProxyIPs {
if remoteIP.String() == trustedIP {
return true
}
}
return false
}
Add configuration option:
[auth]
ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = false
REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_HEADER = X-WEBAUTH-USER
; Comma-separated list of trusted proxy IPs (default: 127.0.0.1)
TRUSTED_PROXY_IPS = 127.0.0.1,::1
; Whether to require trusted proxy validation (recommended: true)
REQUIRE_TRUSTED_PROXY = true
References
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.14.2"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "gogs.io/gogs"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.14.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-25119"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-22T17:09:51Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T21:16:52Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nWhen `ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION` is enabled, Gogs accepts the configured authentication header (default: `X-WEBAUTH-USER`) directly from client requests without validating that the request originated from a trusted reverse proxy. Any remote attacker who can reach the Gogs service can forge this header to impersonate any user or trigger automatic account creation, completely bypassing authentication.\n\n## Root Cause\n\nThe vulnerability exists because Gogs reads the authentication header directly from the incoming HTTP request without any verification that the header was set by a trusted reverse proxy.\n\n### Vulnerable Code Flow\n\nIn `internal/context/auth.go` lines 206-234:\n\n```go\nfunc authenticatedUser(store AuthStore, ctx *macaron.Context, sess session.Store) (_ *database.User, isBasicAuth, isTokenAuth bool) {\n // ... existing auth checks ...\n\n if uid \u003c= 0 {\n if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAuthentication {\n // Reads header DIRECTLY from client request - NO VALIDATION!\n webAuthUser := ctx.Req.Header.Get(conf.Auth.ReverseProxyAuthenticationHeader)\n if len(webAuthUser) \u003e 0 {\n user, err := store.GetUserByUsername(ctx.Req.Context(), webAuthUser)\n if err != nil {\n if !database.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {\n log.Error(\"Failed to get user by name: %v\", err)\n return nil, false, false\n }\n\n // Check if enabled auto-registration.\n if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAutoRegistration {\n // Creates new user with forged username!\n user, err = store.CreateUser(\n ctx.Req.Context(),\n webAuthUser,\n gouuid.NewV4().String()+\"@localhost\",\n database.CreateUserOptions{\n Activated: true,\n },\n )\n if err != nil {\n log.Error(\"Failed to create user %q: %v\", webAuthUser, err)\n return nil, false, false\n }\n }\n }\n // Returns user as authenticated without any verification!\n return user, false, false\n }\n }\n // ... fallback to basic auth ...\n }\n // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe code has **zero validation** that:\n1. The request came through a reverse proxy\n2. The header was set by the proxy (not the client)\n3. Gogs is actually behind a reverse proxy\n4. The direct access to Gogs is restricted\n\nThe vulnerability occurs when:\n- Gogs is publicly accessible (e.g., `0.0.0.0:3000`)\n- `ENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = true`\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Prerequisites\n\nGogs instance with the following configuration in `custom/conf/app.ini`:\n\n```ini\n[auth]\nENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = true\n```\n\nAn attacker can impersonate any user including administrators:\n\n```bash\n# Become admin instantly\ncurl http://gogs.example.com/ -H \"X-WEBAUTH-USER: \u003cusername\u003e\"\n```\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1835\" height=\"1143\" alt=\"impersonation_example\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bae60772-5eb3-4f54-9fe0-5db01595bd56\" /\u003e\n\n## Recommended Fixes\n\nAdd validation to ensure headers come from trusted sources:\n\n```go\nfunc authenticatedUser(store AuthStore, ctx *macaron.Context, sess session.Store) (_ *database.User, isBasicAuth, isTokenAuth bool) {\n // ... existing code ...\n\n if uid \u003c= 0 {\n if conf.Auth.EnableReverseProxyAuthentication {\n // Validate request is from trusted proxy\n if !isRequestFromTrustedProxy(ctx.Req) {\n log.Warn(\"Reverse proxy auth header received from untrusted source: %s\", ctx.RemoteAddr())\n return nil, false, false\n }\n\n webAuthUser := ctx.Req.Header.Get(conf.Auth.ReverseProxyAuthenticationHeader)\n // ... rest of the code ...\n }\n }\n // ...\n}\n\n// New validation function\nfunc isRequestFromTrustedProxy(req *http.Request) bool {\n // Check if request is from localhost/trusted IPs\n remoteIP := getRemoteIP(req)\n\n // Only accept from localhost by default\n if remoteIP.IsLoopback() {\n return true\n }\n\n // Check against configured trusted proxy IPs\n for _, trustedIP := range conf.Auth.TrustedProxyIPs {\n if remoteIP.String() == trustedIP {\n return true\n }\n }\n\n return false\n}\n```\n\nAdd configuration option:\n\n```ini\n[auth]\nENABLE_REVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION = false\nREVERSE_PROXY_AUTHENTICATION_HEADER = X-WEBAUTH-USER\n; Comma-separated list of trusted proxy IPs (default: 127.0.0.1)\nTRUSTED_PROXY_IPS = 127.0.0.1,::1\n; Whether to require trusted proxy validation (recommended: true)\nREQUIRE_TRUSTED_PROXY = true\n```\n\n## References\n\n- [CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/290.html)\n- [OWASP: Authentication Cheat Sheet](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Authentication_Cheat_Sheet.html)\n- [OWASP Top 10 2021 - A07: Identification and Authentication Failures](https://owasp.org/Top10/A07_2021-Identification_and_Authentication_Failures/)",
"id": "GHSA-w6j9-vw59-27wv",
"modified": "2026-07-21T13:16:36Z",
"published": "2026-06-22T17:09:51Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-w6j9-vw59-27wv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-25119"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8264"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/0089c4c8e5b8d99eb6e5c8727f8f40d765f1f58a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Gogs has an Authentication Bypass via Unvalidated Reverse Proxy Headers"
}
GHSA-W7M7-3XCF-MP48
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-16 21:31 – Updated: 2026-06-18 20:17Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-8c59-hr4w-qg69. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
OpenClaw before 2026.5.3 contains a policy enforcement vulnerability where Zalo contacts with mutable display metadata could match allowFrom policy entries through display name changes. Attackers with mutable display names could receive agent responses intended for different Zalo identities when the feature is enabled.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "2026.5.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-18T20:17:21Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-16T19:17:03Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Duplicate Advisory\n\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of\u00a0GHSA-8c59-hr4w-qg69. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n## Original Description\nOpenClaw before 2026.5.3 contains a policy enforcement vulnerability where Zalo contacts with mutable display metadata could match allowFrom policy entries through display name changes. Attackers with mutable display names could receive agent responses intended for different Zalo identities when the feature is enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-w7m7-3xcf-mp48",
"modified": "2026-06-18T20:17:21Z",
"published": "2026-06-16T21:31:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-8c59-hr4w-qg69"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53857"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-mutable-display-name-binding-in-zalo-allowfrom-policy"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Zalo allowFrom could bind to mutable display names",
"withdrawn": "2026-06-18T20:17:21Z"
}
GHSA-W8C7-VVC9-5284
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:42 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:42MetInfo through 5.3.17 accepts the same CAPTCHA response for 120 seconds, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended challenge requirements by modifying the client-server data stream, as demonstrated by the login/findpass page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-11717"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-07-28T05:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "MetInfo through 5.3.17 accepts the same CAPTCHA response for 120 seconds, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended challenge requirements by modifying the client-server data stream, as demonstrated by the login/findpass page.",
"id": "GHSA-w8c7-vvc9-5284",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:42:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:42:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11717"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lncken.cn/?p=343"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-WCC2-HC4J-M2WC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-28 00:00 – Updated: 2025-11-04 21:30Layer 2 network filtering capabilities such as IPv6 RA guard can be bypassed using LLC/SNAP headers with invalid length (and optionally VLAN0 headers)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-27861"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-130",
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-27T19:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Layer 2 network filtering capabilities such as IPv6 RA guard can be bypassed using LLC/SNAP headers with invalid length (and optionally VLAN0 headers)",
"id": "GHSA-wcc2-hc4j-m2wc",
"modified": "2025-11-04T21:30:27Z",
"published": "2022-09-28T00:00:18Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27861"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://blog.champtar.fr/VLAN0_LLC_SNAP"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard/08"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/855201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.1Q/10323"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.2/1048"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/855201"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-WCFJ-C995-X8WH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-12 21:31 – Updated: 2026-08-12 21:31Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows), versions prior to 2.3.0.17, contain an Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges and arbitrary code execution.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-59914"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-284",
"CWE-290"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-12T20:17:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows), versions prior to 2.3.0.17, contain an Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of Privileges and arbitrary code execution.",
"id": "GHSA-wcfj-c995-x8wh",
"modified": "2026-08-12T21:31:40Z",
"published": "2026-08-12T21:31:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000490038/dsa-2026-320-security-updates-for-dell-display-and-peripheral-manager-ddpm-windows-for-multiple-vulnerabilities"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
CAPEC-21: Exploitation of Trusted Identifiers
An adversary guesses, obtains, or "rides" a trusted identifier (e.g. session ID, resource ID, cookie, etc.) to perform authorized actions under the guise of an authenticated user or service.
CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client
An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.
CAPEC-459: Creating a Rogue Certification Authority Certificate
An adversary exploits a weakness resulting from using a hashing algorithm with weak collision resistance to generate certificate signing requests (CSR) that contain collision blocks in their "to be signed" parts. The adversary submits one CSR to be signed by a trusted certificate authority then uses the signed blob to make a second certificate appear signed by said certificate authority. Due to the hash collision, both certificates, though different, hash to the same value and so the signed blob works just as well in the second certificate. The net effect is that the adversary's second X.509 certificate, which the Certification Authority has never seen, is now signed and validated by that Certification Authority.
CAPEC-461: Web Services API Signature Forgery Leveraging Hash Function Extension Weakness
An adversary utilizes a hash function extension/padding weakness, to modify the parameters passed to the web service requesting authentication by generating their own call in order to generate a legitimate signature hash (as described in the notes), without knowledge of the secret token sometimes provided by the web service.
CAPEC-473: Signature Spoof
An attacker generates a message or datablock that causes the recipient to believe that the message or datablock was generated and cryptographically signed by an authoritative or reputable source, misleading a victim or victim operating system into performing malicious actions.
CAPEC-476: Signature Spoofing by Misrepresentation
An attacker exploits a weakness in the parsing or display code of the recipient software to generate a data blob containing a supposedly valid signature, but the signer's identity is falsely represented, which can lead to the attacker manipulating the recipient software or its victim user to perform compromising actions.
CAPEC-59: Session Credential Falsification through Prediction
This attack targets predictable session ID in order to gain privileges. The attacker can predict the session ID used during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking.
CAPEC-60: Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)
This attack targets the reuse of valid session ID to spoof the target system in order to gain privileges. The attacker tries to reuse a stolen session ID used previously during a transaction to perform spoofing and session hijacking. Another name for this type of attack is Session Replay.
CAPEC-667: Bluetooth Impersonation AttackS (BIAS)
An adversary disguises the MAC address of their Bluetooth enabled device to one for which there exists an active and trusted connection and authenticates successfully. The adversary can then perform malicious actions on the target Bluetooth device depending on the target’s capabilities.
CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)
An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.