Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-287

Discouraged

Improper Authentication

Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.

6703 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-974C-VF2R-989V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-08 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-13 00:00
VLAI
Details

Unverified Password Change in GitHub repository phpfusion/phpfusion prior to 9.10.20.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-3152"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-620"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-07T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unverified Password Change in GitHub repository phpfusion/phpfusion prior to 9.10.20.",
  "id": "GHSA-974c-vf2r-989v",
  "modified": "2022-09-13T00:00:35Z",
  "published": "2022-09-08T00:00:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3152"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/phpfusion/phpfusion/commit/57c96d4a0c00e8e1e25100087654688123c6e991"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://huntr.dev/bounties/b3f888d2-5c71-4682-8287-42613401fd5a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9769-MG62-VRHV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-20 21:30 – Updated: 2022-12-29 21:30
VLAI
Details

Some smartphones have authentication-related (including session management) vulnerabilities as the setup wizard is bypassed. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability affects the smartphone availability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-41590"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-20T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Some smartphones have authentication-related (including session management) vulnerabilities as the setup wizard is bypassed. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability affects the smartphone availability.",
  "id": "GHSA-9769-mg62-vrhv",
  "modified": "2022-12-29T21:30:30Z",
  "published": "2022-12-20T21:30:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-41590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://device.harmonyos.com/en/docs/security/update/security-bulletins-202212-0000001462975397"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-9782-QGV6-6P8G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-19 12:31 – Updated: 2026-04-19 12:31
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was identified in kodcloud KodExplorer up to 4.52. This impacts the function fileGet of the file /app/controller/share.class.php of the component fileGet Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument fileUrl leads to improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-6569"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-19T11:16:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was identified in kodcloud KodExplorer up to 4.52. This impacts the function fileGet of the file /app/controller/share.class.php of the component fileGet Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument fileUrl leads to improper authentication. The attack can be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-9782-qgv6-6p8g",
  "modified": "2026-04-19T12:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-04-19T12:31:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6569"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/789982"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/358203"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/358203/cti"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vulnplus-note.wetolink.com/share/wgfZR6kXRApl"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-97CV-6PJF-5F9Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 01:29 – Updated: 2024-09-04 20:55
VLAI
Summary
AsyncSSH SSH Server Authentication Bypass
Details

The SSH server implementation of AsyncSSH before 1.12.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "AsyncSSH"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.12.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-7749"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-03T22:53:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-12T19:29:00Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The SSH server implementation of AsyncSSH before 1.12.1 does not properly check whether authentication is completed before processing other requests. A customized SSH client can simply skip the authentication step.",
  "id": "GHSA-97cv-6pjf-5f9q",
  "modified": "2024-09-04T20:55:08Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:29:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-7749"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/commit/16e6ebfa893167c7d9d3f6dc7a2c0d197e47f43a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/commit/c161e26cdc0d41b745b63d9f17b437f073bf7ba4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/asyncssh/PYSEC-2018-108.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/asyncssh-announce/57_5O7kiHSA/8BXZ_hxHAQAJ"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "AsyncSSH SSH Server Authentication Bypass"
}

GHSA-97CV-X3Q8-67H7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:39 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:39
VLAI
Details

Unspecified vulnerability in xscreensaver in Sun Solaris 10 Java Desktop System (JDS), when using the GNOME On-Screen Keyboard (GOK), allows local users to bypass authentication via unknown vectors that cause the screen saver to crash.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-1356"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-03-17T17:44:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in xscreensaver in Sun Solaris 10 Java Desktop System (JDS), when using the GNOME On-Screen Keyboard (GOK), allows local users to bypass authentication via unknown vectors that cause the screen saver to crash.",
  "id": "GHSA-97cv-x3q8-67h7",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:39:21Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:39:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-1356"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-234661-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28243"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019614"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0875/references"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-97F5-M9J7-FPQ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:40 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:40
VLAI
Details

(1) iodined.c and (2) user.c in iodine before 0.7.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by continuing execution after an error has been triggering.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-4168"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-07-03T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "(1) iodined.c and (2) user.c in iodine before 0.7.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by continuing execution after an error has been triggering.",
  "id": "GHSA-97f5-m9j7-fpq3",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:40:41Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:40:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-4168"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751834"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/yarrick/iodine/blob/b715be5cf3978fbe589b03b09c9398d0d791f850/CHANGELOG"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59417"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2964"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/06/16/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/06/18/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-97G8-XFVW-Q4HG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-13 19:44 – Updated: 2023-09-20 22:30
VLAI
Summary
Keycloak vulnerable to session takeover with OIDC offline refreshtokens
Details

An issue was discovered in Keycloak when using a client with the offline_access scope. Reuse of session ids across root and user authentication sessions and a lack of root session validation enabled attackers to resolve a user session attached to a different previously authenticated user.

This issue most affects users of shared computers. Suppose a user logs out of their account (without clearing their cookies) in a mobile app or similar client that includes the offline_access scope, and another user authenticates to the application. In that case, it will share the same root session id, and when utilizing the refresh token, they will be issued a token for the original user.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 19.0.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-parent"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "20.0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-3916"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-304",
      "CWE-488",
      "CWE-613"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-12-13T19:44:33Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-20T15:15:11Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in Keycloak when using a client with the `offline_access` scope. Reuse of session ids across root and user authentication sessions and a lack of root session validation enabled attackers to resolve a user session attached to a different previously authenticated user.\n\nThis issue most affects users of shared computers. Suppose a user logs out of their account (without clearing their cookies) in a mobile app or similar client that includes the `offline_access` scope, and another user authenticates to the application. In that case, it will share the same root session id, and when utilizing the refresh token, they will be issued a token for the original user.",
  "id": "GHSA-97g8-xfvw-q4hg",
  "modified": "2023-09-20T22:30:19Z",
  "published": "2022-12-13T19:44:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/security/advisories/GHSA-97g8-xfvw-q4hg"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3916"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8961"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8962"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8963"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8964"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:8965"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1043"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1044"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1045"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1047"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1049"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3916"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141404"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Keycloak vulnerable to session takeover with OIDC offline refreshtokens"
}

GHSA-97JF-46M3-8953

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-12 18:30 – Updated: 2026-06-02 22:18
VLAI
Summary
Security feature bypass vulnerability in Azure Key Vault Keys library for Java
Details

The Java Key Vault Keys library in the Azure SDK for Java contains an issue in the local cryptographic verification path where authentication tag comparison was implemented incorrectly. In affected applications that use the vulnerable local cryptography path, specially crafted encrypted input may bypass integrity verification checks. Operations delegated to the Key Vault service are not affected. The issue is addressed in version 4.10.6.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.azure:azure-security-keyvault-keys"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.10.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33117"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287",
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-02T22:18:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-12T18:17:04Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Java Key Vault Keys library in the Azure SDK for Java contains an issue in the local cryptographic verification path where authentication tag comparison was implemented incorrectly. In affected applications that use the vulnerable local cryptography path, specially crafted encrypted input may bypass integrity verification checks. Operations delegated to the Key Vault service are not affected. The issue is addressed in version 4.10.6.",
  "id": "GHSA-97jf-46m3-8953",
  "modified": "2026-06-02T22:18:30Z",
  "published": "2026-05-12T18:30:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33117"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/pull/48476"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/commit/1b5c5c79d85a5c9a9cfd07f6cdff6fd0f50eccf9"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33117"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Security feature bypass vulnerability in Azure Key Vault Keys library for Java"
}

GHSA-97P7-8JV8-2RMM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-12 06:31 – Updated: 2026-09-12 18:30
VLAI
Details

The Frontegg SAML SSO WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not verify the signature or issuer of SAML authentication responses before establishing a session, allowing unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user, including administrators, as well as to create arbitrary accounts.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-75800"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-12T06:16:23Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "The Frontegg SAML SSO WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not verify the signature or issuer of SAML authentication responses before establishing a session, allowing unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user, including administrators, as well as to create arbitrary accounts.",
  "id": "GHSA-97p7-8jv8-2rmm",
  "modified": "2026-09-12T18:30:20Z",
  "published": "2026-09-12T06:31:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75800"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/be658aa5-8f7f-4938-bf13-b2e6ed3dcf89"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-97P9-9XPH-WFXF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:50 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:50
VLAI
Details

webSPELL 4.0, and possibly later versions, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a ws_auth cookie, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4782.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-1160"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-02T21:18:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "webSPELL 4.0, and possibly later versions, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via a ws_auth cookie, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4782.",
  "id": "GHSA-97p9-9xph-wfxf",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T17:50:51Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:50:51Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1160"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/33143"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2337"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/460937/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.

CAPEC-114: Authentication Abuse

An attacker obtains unauthorized access to an application, service or device either through knowledge of the inherent weaknesses of an authentication mechanism, or by exploiting a flaw in the authentication scheme's implementation. In such an attack an authentication mechanism is functioning but a carefully controlled sequence of events causes the mechanism to grant access to the attacker.

CAPEC-115: Authentication Bypass

An attacker gains access to application, service, or device with the privileges of an authorized or privileged user by evading or circumventing an authentication mechanism. The attacker is therefore able to access protected data without authentication ever having taken place.

CAPEC-151: Identity Spoofing

Identity Spoofing refers to the action of assuming (i.e., taking on) the identity of some other entity (human or non-human) and then using that identity to accomplish a goal. An adversary may craft messages that appear to come from a different principle or use stolen / spoofed authentication credentials.

CAPEC-194: Fake the Source of Data

An adversary takes advantage of improper authentication to provide data or services under a falsified identity. The purpose of using the falsified identity may be to prevent traceability of the provided data or to assume the rights granted to another individual. One of the simplest forms of this attack would be the creation of an email message with a modified "From" field in order to appear that the message was sent from someone other than the actual sender. The root of the attack (in this case the email system) fails to properly authenticate the source and this results in the reader incorrectly performing the instructed action. Results of the attack vary depending on the details of the attack, but common results include privilege escalation, obfuscation of other attacks, and data corruption/manipulation.

CAPEC-22: Exploiting Trust in Client

An attack of this type exploits vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client. An attacker executes this type of attack by communicating directly with the server where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client. There are numerous variations of this type of attack.

CAPEC-57: Utilizing REST's Trust in the System Resource to Obtain Sensitive Data

This attack utilizes a REST(REpresentational State Transfer)-style applications' trust in the system resources and environment to obtain sensitive data once SSL is terminated.

CAPEC-593: Session Hijacking

This type of attack involves an adversary that exploits weaknesses in an application's use of sessions in performing authentication. The adversary is able to steal or manipulate an active session and use it to gain unathorized access to the application.

CAPEC-633: Token Impersonation

An adversary exploits a weakness in authentication to create an access token (or equivalent) that impersonates a different entity, and then associates a process/thread to that that impersonated token. This action causes a downstream user to make a decision or take action that is based on the assumed identity, and not the response that blocks the adversary.

CAPEC-650: Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server

By exploiting insufficient permissions, it is possible to upload a web shell to a web server in such a way that it can be executed remotely. This shell can have various capabilities, thereby acting as a "gateway" to the underlying web server. The shell might execute at the higher permission level of the web server, providing the ability the execute malicious code at elevated levels.

CAPEC-94: Adversary in the Middle (AiTM)

An adversary targets the communication between two components (typically client and server), in order to alter or obtain data from transactions. A general approach entails the adversary placing themself within the communication channel between the two components.