Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-22

Allowed-with-Review

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

13073 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-V4H7-5MX9-Q833

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-12-31 00:00 – Updated: 2022-01-13 00:01
VLAI
Details

Quagga Services on D-Link DIR-2640 less than or equal to version 1.11B02 are affected by an absolute path traversal vulnerability that allows a remote, authenticated attacker to set an arbitrary file on the router's filesystem as the log file used by either Quagga service (zebra or ripd). Subsequent log messages will be appended to the file, prefixed by a timestamp and some logging metadata. Remote code execution can be achieved by using this vulnerability to append to a shell script on the router's filesystem, and then awaiting or triggering the execution of that script. A remote, unauthenticated root shell can easily be obtained on the device in this fashion.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-20134"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-12-30T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Quagga Services on D-Link DIR-2640 less than or equal to version 1.11B02 are affected by an absolute path traversal vulnerability that allows a remote, authenticated attacker to set an arbitrary file on the router\u0027s filesystem as the log file used by either Quagga service (zebra or ripd). Subsequent log messages will be appended to the file, prefixed by a timestamp and some logging metadata. Remote code execution can be achieved by using this vulnerability to append to a shell script on the router\u0027s filesystem, and then awaiting or triggering the execution of that script. A remote, unauthenticated root shell can easily be obtained on the device in this fashion.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4h7-5mx9-q833",
  "modified": "2022-01-13T00:01:52Z",
  "published": "2021-12-31T00:00:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20134"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2021-44"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V4H8-98X3-FCRP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:54 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:54
VLAI
Details

Directory traversal vulnerability in includes/lib/gz.php in Chyrp 2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the file parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-2744.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-2780"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-07-19T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Directory traversal vulnerability in includes/lib/gz.php in Chyrp 2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the file parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-2744.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4h8-98x3-fcrp",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T02:54:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:54:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2780"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/68565"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/73891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/45184"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8312"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.justanotherhacker.com/advisories/JAHx113.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2011-001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/13/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/13/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/518890/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48672"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V4HR-4JPX-56GC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-06 05:51 – Updated: 2022-08-06 05:51
VLAI
Summary
Streamlit directory traversal vulnerability
Details

Impact

Users hosting Streamlit app(s) that use custom components are vulnerable to a directory traversal attack that could leak data from their web server file-system such as: server logs, world readable files, and potentially other sensitive information.

An attacker can craft a malicious URL with file paths and the streamlit server would process that URL and return the contents of that file.

Patches

On July 27th at 2:20PM PST we rolled out a patch in release 1.11.1. This patch ensures that any file operations are restricted only to the custom component directory and cannot traverse outside of that. We strongly recommend users upgrade to v1.11.1 as soon as possible. We have notified the Streamlit community and popular hosting providers about this issue so they can patch quickly. As a precautionary measure, we are also upgrading all users on Streamlit Cloud wherever possible. We continue to check other occurrences of this vulnerability and monitor potential exploits wherever we can.

Finally, as a general security practice, we recommend users review custom components for any malicious code before using them in their apps. Following security best practices such as running web servers with low privileges, firewalls, etc. for hosting your apps, helps in mitigating the severity of such exploits.

Workarounds

None.

References

  • https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRzF9K6gwv9KnQz---1pt0SdHMVt-CHuKMmdTH1uct7xPcK7vToP4FvYdI84aO6rGfCmrBSaViri0Nd/pub

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email us at security@streamlit.io

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "streamlit"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.63.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.11.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-35918"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-08-06T05:51:50Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-01T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nUsers hosting Streamlit app(s) that use custom components are vulnerable to a directory traversal attack that could leak data from their web server file-system such as: server logs, world readable files, and potentially other sensitive information.\n\nAn attacker can craft a malicious URL with file paths and the streamlit server would process that URL and return the contents of that file.\n\n### Patches\nOn July 27th at 2:20PM PST we rolled out a patch in release 1.11.1. This patch ensures that any file operations are restricted only to the custom component directory and cannot traverse outside of that. We strongly recommend users upgrade to v1.11.1 as soon as possible. We have notified the Streamlit community and popular hosting providers about this issue so they can patch quickly. As a precautionary measure, we are also upgrading all users on Streamlit Cloud wherever possible. We continue to check other occurrences of this vulnerability and monitor potential exploits wherever we can.\n\nFinally, as a general security practice, we recommend users review custom components for any malicious code before using them in their apps. Following security best practices such as running web servers with low privileges, firewalls, etc. for hosting your apps, helps in mitigating the severity of such exploits.\n\n### Workarounds\nNone.\n\n### References\n* https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRzF9K6gwv9KnQz---1pt0SdHMVt-CHuKMmdTH1uct7xPcK7vToP4FvYdI84aO6rGfCmrBSaViri0Nd/pub\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n* Email us at [security@streamlit.io](mailto:security@streamlit.io)\n",
  "id": "GHSA-v4hr-4jpx-56gc",
  "modified": "2022-08-06T05:51:50Z",
  "published": "2022-08-06T05:51:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/security/advisories/GHSA-v4hr-4jpx-56gc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-35918"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/commit/80d9979d5f4a00217743d607078a1d867fad8acf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/streamlit/PYSEC-2022-248.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Streamlit directory traversal vulnerability"
}

GHSA-V4J2-CWMM-XG89

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-09-27 15:30 – Updated: 2023-09-27 20:16
VLAI
Summary
OpenCart Path Traversal vulnerability
Details

Path Traversal in OpenCart versions 4.0.0.0 to 4.0.2.2 allows an authenticated user with access/modify privilege on the Log component to empty out arbitrary files on the server

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "opencart/opencart"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.0.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-2315"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-09-27T20:16:23Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-09-27T15:18:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Path Traversal in OpenCart versions 4.0.0.0 to 4.0.2.2 allows an authenticated user with access/modify privilege on the Log component to empty out arbitrary files on the server",
  "id": "GHSA-v4j2-cwmm-xg89",
  "modified": "2023-09-27T20:16:23Z",
  "published": "2023-09-27T15:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2315"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencart/opencart/commit/0a8dd91e385f70e42795380009fd644224c1bc97"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencart/opencart"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/opencart/opencart/releases/tag/4.0.2.3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://starlabs.sg/advisories/23/23-2315"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenCart Path Traversal vulnerability"
}

GHSA-V4JP-473Q-HXW4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-11 12:32 – Updated: 2026-06-11 12:32
VLAI
Details

Golem OEE MES is vulnerable to an unauthenticated path traversal flaw. This vulnerability allows an attacker in the same local network to read arbitrary files from the server's operating system by manipulating HTTP request paths. This issue has been fixed in version 11.6.0

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-8464"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-11T12:16:32Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Golem OEE MES is vulnerable to an unauthenticated path traversal flaw. This vulnerability allows an attacker in the same local network to read arbitrary files from the server\u0027s operating system by manipulating HTTP request paths.\nThis issue has been fixed in version\u00a011.6.0",
  "id": "GHSA-v4jp-473q-hxw4",
  "modified": "2026-06-11T12:32:45Z",
  "published": "2026-06-11T12:32:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-8464"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/06/CVE-2026-8464"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.neuron.com.pl/mes-help/mes-download.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V4M8-QVH3-JM6C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:43 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:43
VLAI
Details

An issue was discovered in AfterLogic Aurora through 7.7.9 and WebMail Pro through 7.7.9. They allow directory traversal to read files (such as a data/settings/settings.xml file containing admin panel credentials), as demonstrated by dav/server.php/files/personal/%2e%2e when using the caldav_public_user account (with caldav_public_user as its password).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-26294"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-03-07T04:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in AfterLogic Aurora through 7.7.9 and WebMail Pro through 7.7.9. They allow directory traversal to read files (such as a data/settings/settings.xml file containing admin panel credentials), as demonstrated by dav/server.php/files/personal/%2e%2e when using the caldav_public_user account (with caldav_public_user as its password).",
  "id": "GHSA-v4m8-qvh3-jm6c",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:43:49Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:43:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26294"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/E3SEC/AfterLogic/blob/main/CVE-2021-26294-exposure-of-sensitive-information-vulnerability.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V4MQ-P756-P4F5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:30 – Updated: 2022-11-22 19:45
VLAI
Summary
Play Framework's Assets controller vulnerable to directory traversal
Details

A directory traversal vulnerability has been found in the Assets controller in Play Framework 2.6.12 through 2.6.15 (fixed in 2.6.16) when running on Windows. It allows a remote attacker to download arbitrary files from the target server via specially crafted HTTP requests.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.typesafe.play:play_2.12"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.6.12"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.6.16"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-13864"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-11-22T19:45:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-17T12:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A directory traversal vulnerability has been found in the Assets controller in Play Framework 2.6.12 through 2.6.15 (fixed in 2.6.16) when running on Windows. It allows a remote attacker to download arbitrary files from the target server via specially crafted HTTP requests.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4mq-p756-p4f5",
  "modified": "2022-11-22T19:45:54Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:30:27Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13864"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://discuss.lightbend.com/t/play-2-6-16-released/1575"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.playframework.com/security/vulnerability/CVE-2018-13864-PathTraversal"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Play Framework\u0027s Assets controller vulnerable to directory traversal"
}

GHSA-V4P8-CPQ3-F35V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:37 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:37
VLAI
Details

Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the EDraw Flowchart ActiveX control in EDImage.ocx 2.0.2005.1104 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files with arbitrary contents via a full pathname in the second argument to the HttpDownloadFile method, a different product than CVE-2007-4420.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-5826"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-11-05T19:46:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the EDraw Flowchart ActiveX control in EDImage.ocx 2.0.2005.1104 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files with arbitrary contents via a full pathname in the second argument to the HttpDownloadFile method, a different product than CVE-2007-4420.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4p8-cpq3-f35v",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:37:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:37:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5826"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38223"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/4598"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/38415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://shinnai.altervista.org/exploits/txt/TXT_3kXDua0a0Tl5Vm5LU3ms.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26308"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/3710"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-V4V6-4J9W-2V9J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-12-13 00:30 – Updated: 2022-12-15 18:30
VLAI
Details

A directory traversal vulnerability in the component SCS.Web.Server.SPI/1.0 of Linx Sphere LINX 7.35.ST15 allows attackers to read arbitrary files.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-45269"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-12T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A directory traversal vulnerability in the component SCS.Web.Server.SPI/1.0 of Linx Sphere LINX 7.35.ST15 allows attackers to read arbitrary files.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4v6-4j9w-2v9j",
  "modified": "2022-12-15T18:30:16Z",
  "published": "2022-12-13T00:30:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-45269"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/robotshell/7b97af98c5dc0cacd57e6bfac90019cd"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-V4X8-GW49-7HV4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2020-09-03 20:37 – Updated: 2020-08-31 18:49
VLAI
Summary
Path Traversal in swagger-injector
Details

All versions of swagger-injector are vulnerable to Path Traversal. The package fails to sanitize URLs, allowing attackers to access server files outside of the configured dist folder using relative paths.

Recommendation

No fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative package until a fix is made available.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "swagger-injector"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:49:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "All versions of `swagger-injector` are vulnerable to Path Traversal. The package fails to sanitize URLs, allowing attackers to access server files outside of the configured `dist` folder using relative paths.\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\nNo fix is currently available. Consider using an alternative package until a fix is made available.",
  "id": "GHSA-v4x8-gw49-7hv4",
  "modified": "2020-08-31T18:49:54Z",
  "published": "2020-09-03T20:37:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/1172"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Path Traversal in swagger-injector"
}

Mitigation MIT-5.1
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434.
  • Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the "../" string.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation MIT-20.1
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
  • Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes:
  • realpath() in C
  • getCanonicalPath() in Java
  • GetFullPath() in ASP.NET
  • realpath() or abs_path() in Perl
  • realpath() in PHP
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

Mitigation MIT-29
Operation

Strategy: Firewall

Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

Mitigation MIT-21.1
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion

  • When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Sandbox or Jail

  • Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
  • OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
  • This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
  • Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-34
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction

  • Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately.
  • This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
  • Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
  • If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
  • Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
  • In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation Implementation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

CAPEC-126: Path Traversal

An adversary uses path manipulation methods to exploit insufficient input validation of a target to obtain access to data that should be not be retrievable by ordinary well-formed requests. A typical variety of this attack involves specifying a path to a desired file together with dot-dot-slash characters, resulting in the file access API or function traversing out of the intended directory structure and into the root file system. By replacing or modifying the expected path information the access function or API retrieves the file desired by the attacker. These attacks either involve the attacker providing a complete path to a targeted file or using control characters (e.g. path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.)) to reach desired directories or files.

CAPEC-64: Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic

This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple ways of encoding a URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. A URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.

CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls

An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.

CAPEC-78: Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding

This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An adversary can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the adversary tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.

CAPEC-79: Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding

This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An adversary would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the adversary many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.