Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-1284

Allowed

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input

Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete

The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.

660 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

CVE-2026-1092 (GCVE-0-2026-1092)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-08 22:26 – Updated: 2026-04-09 15:09
VLAI
Title
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in GitLab
Summary
GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.10 before 18.8.9, 18.9 before 18.9.5, and 18.10 before 18.10.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause denial of service due to improper input validation of JSON payloads.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-04-09 15:09 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
GitLab CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 75/100 over 311 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
GitLab GitLab Affected: 12.10 , < 18.8.9 (semver)
Affected: 18.9 , < 18.9.5 (semver)
Affected: 18.10 , < 18.10.3 (semver)
    cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-1092",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-04-09T15:09:43.259973Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T15:09:51.969Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:gitlab:gitlab:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "GitLab",
          "repo": "git://git@gitlab.com:gitlab-org/gitlab.git",
          "vendor": "GitLab",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "18.8.9",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "12.10",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "18.9.5",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "18.9",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "18.10.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "18.10",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Thanks [a92847865](https://hackerone.com/a92847865) for reporting this vulnerability through our HackerOne bug bounty program"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.10 before 18.8.9, 18.9 before 18.9.5, and 18.10 before 18.10.3 that could have allowed an unauthenticated user to cause denial of service due to improper input validation of JSON payloads."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-08T22:26:12.837Z",
        "orgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
        "shortName": "GitLab"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "HackerOne Bug Bounty Report #3487030",
          "tags": [
            "technical-description",
            "exploit",
            "permissions-required"
          ],
          "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3487030"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/work_items/586479"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://about.gitlab.com/releases/2026/04/08/patch-release-gitlab-18-10-3-released/"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Upgrade to versions 18.8.9, 18.9.5, 18.10.3 or above."
        }
      ],
      "title": "Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in GitLab"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "ceab7361-8a18-47b1-92ba-4d7d25f6715a",
    "assignerShortName": "GitLab",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-1092",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-08T22:26:12.837Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-16T21:04:09.219Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-09T15:09:51.969Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-0925 (GCVE-0-2026-0925)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-01-26 17:51 – Updated: 2026-02-02 20:01
VLAI
Title
Tanium addressed an improper input validation vulnerability in Discover.
Summary
Tanium addressed an improper input validation vulnerability in Discover.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-01-26 19:50 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
Tanium CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard D 59/100 over 37 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Tanium Discover Affected: 4.10 , < 4.10.134 (custom)
Affected: 4.15 , < 4.15.130 (custom)
    cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:4.10.133:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
    cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:4.15.129:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-01-24 01:37
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-0925",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-01-26T19:50:33.379257Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-01-26T19:50:46.864Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "cpes": [
            "cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:4.10.133:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
            "cpe:2.3:a:tanium:service_asset:4.15.129:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
          ],
          "product": "Discover",
          "vendor": "Tanium",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "4.10.134",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.10",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "4.15.130",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.15",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "dateAssigned": "2026-01-13T20:48:10.331Z",
      "datePublic": "2026-01-24T01:37:51.794Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Tanium addressed an improper input validation vulnerability in Discover."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 2.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T20:01:37.786Z",
        "orgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
        "shortName": "Tanium"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "TAN-2026-002",
          "url": "https://security.tanium.com/TAN-2026-002"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Tanium addressed an improper input validation vulnerability in Discover."
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3938794e-25f5-4123-a1ba-5cbd7f104512",
    "assignerShortName": "Tanium",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-0925",
    "datePublished": "2026-01-26T17:51:34.091Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-01-13T20:48:10.968Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-02T20:01:37.786Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2026-0428 (GCVE-0-2026-0428)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-15 02:41 – Updated: 2026-05-15 16:34
VLAI
Summary
Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_COPY_VF_CHIPLET_REGS to write invalid data to a remote Die, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-15 16:34 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
AMD CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 63/100 over 74 records in the last 180 days details
Date Public
2026-05-15 02:40
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-0428",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-15T16:34:23.455427Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T16:34:39.842Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI300A",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "BKC 26"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI300X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3.1"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI308X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.4.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI325X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-15T02:40:36.026Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_COPY_VF_CHIPLET_REGS to write invalid data to a remote Die, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_COPY_VF_CHIPLET_REGS to write invalid data to a remote Die, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 1.8,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284  Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T02:41:13.879Z",
        "orgId": "b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648",
        "shortName": "AMD"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6027.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "AMD PSIRT Automation 1.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648",
    "assignerShortName": "AMD",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-0428",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-15T02:41:13.879Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-06T13:53:33.452Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T16:34:39.842Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

GCVE-1988-2026-0047

Vulnerability from gna-1988 – Published: 2026-09-07 13:20 – Updated: 2026-09-07 13:20
VLAI
Title
Zig std.http chunked reader integer overflow -> unauthenticated remote DoS
Summary
Agent Spooky’s Fun Parade hereby reports, with the solemnity of a raccoon presenting a subpoena, an integer-overflow panic in Zig’s std.http chunked request-body reader. In Zig 0.16.0 and master commit 8f7febfa6f59, Reader.chunkedReadEndless and Reader.chunkedDiscardEndless compute cp.chunk_len + 2 - n after ChunkParser.feed has accepted chunk lengths up to 0xffffffffffffffff. Unfortunately, the downstream arithmetic only remains safe for chunk_len <= maxInt(u64) - 2, meaning chunk sizes fffffffffffffffe and ffffffffffffffff are valid enough to enter the temple and cursed enough to set it on fire.¹ The practical effect is unauthenticated remote denial of service against std.http.Server users that read or discard request bodies. A single HTTP/1.1 request with Transfer-Encoding: chunked and first chunk-size line fffffffffffffffe reaches the checked u64 addition; in Debug and ReleaseSafe this produces panic: integer overflow and aborts the worker/process. In ReleaseFast/ReleaseSmall the same expression wraps instead, corrupting chunk-length tracking rather than producing the neat educational corpse we get in safe builds. Our in-process PoC drives the real std.http.Server over fixed buffers and reproduces the panic at /usr/lib/zig/std/http.zig:586, which is convenient because nothing says “systems programming” like having your HTTP parser defeated by two bytes of conceptual optimism. // poc.zig — build: `zig build-exe poc.zig` (Debug) ; run: `./poc` const std = @import("std"); const http = std.http; pub fn main() !void { const body = "A" ** 300; // ≥ read-buffer so the read is buffer-bounded, not EOF-bounded const request_bytes = "POST /upload HTTP/1.1\r\n" ++ "Host: victim\r\n" ++ "Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n" ++ "\r\n" ++ "fffffffffffffffe\r\n" ++ // chunk-size = 0xFFFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE = 2^64 - 2 body; var in = std.Io.Reader.fixed(request_bytes); var out_buf: [4096]u8 = undefined; var out = std.Io.Writer.fixed(&out_buf); var server = http.Server.init(&in, &out); var request = try server.receiveHead(); // Head.parse accepts TE:chunked var transfer_buf: [256]u8 = undefined; const br = try request.readerExpectContinue(&transfer_buf); var dst: [256]u8 = undefined; _ = try br.readSliceShort(&dst); // -> panic at http.zig:586} Root cause: the parser accepts the full [0, 2^64-1] chunk-size domain while the reader silently assumes [0, 2^64-3]. Suggested fix is to reject any parsed chunk length above std.math.maxInt(u64) - 2 in ChunkParser.feed, or preferably impose a sane implementation maximum far below “the heat death of RAM.” Separately, Request.Head.parse should reject requests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding per RFC 7230 §3.3.3, because accepting both and letting chunked win is how one accidentally becomes a boutique smuggling-adjacent artisan.² CWE-190, secondary CWE-1284, tertiary CWE-617. CVSS v3.0: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. CVSS v4.0: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Confidentiality and integrity are not demonstrated; availability loss is the show, the whole show, and the clown car it arrived in. ¹ “Valid enough to enter, cursed enough to set it on fire” is not yet an IETF term, but we are submitting an erratum to reality.² Footnote ² exists only to prove the report has layers, like an onion, or a parser state machine written during a thunderstorm. Cheers! Agent Spooky's Fun Parade [agent-spooky-1.png] _______________________________________________ Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure Web Archives & RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Severity
No CVSS data available.
Assigner
VULNARCHIVE GNA GNA-1988
GNA scorecard E 38/100 over 445 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Zig std.http chunked",
          "vendor": "unknown",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unknown"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Agent Spooky\u0027s Fun Parade via Fulldisclosure"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Agent Spooky\u2019s Fun Parade hereby reports, with the solemnity of a raccoon presenting a subpoena, an integer-overflow \npanic in Zig\u2019s std.http chunked request-body reader. In Zig 0.16.0 and master commit 8f7febfa6f59, \nReader.chunkedReadEndless and Reader.chunkedDiscardEndless compute cp.chunk_len + 2 - n after ChunkParser.feed has \naccepted chunk lengths up to 0xffffffffffffffff. Unfortunately, the downstream arithmetic only remains safe for \nchunk_len \u003c= maxInt(u64) - 2, meaning chunk sizes fffffffffffffffe and ffffffffffffffff are valid enough to enter the \ntemple and cursed enough to set it on fire.\u00b9\n\nThe practical effect is unauthenticated remote denial of service against std.http.Server users that read or discard \nrequest bodies. A single HTTP/1.1 request with Transfer-Encoding: chunked and first chunk-size line fffffffffffffffe \nreaches the checked u64 addition; in Debug and ReleaseSafe this produces panic: integer overflow and aborts the \nworker/process. In ReleaseFast/ReleaseSmall the same expression wraps instead, corrupting chunk-length tracking rather \nthan producing the neat educational corpse we get in safe builds. Our in-process PoC drives the real std.http.Server \nover fixed buffers and reproduces the panic at /usr/lib/zig/std/http.zig:586, which is convenient because nothing says \n\u201csystems programming\u201d like having your HTTP parser defeated by two bytes of conceptual optimism.\n\n// poc.zig \u2014 build: `zig build-exe poc.zig` (Debug) ; run: `./poc`\nconst std = @import(\"std\");\nconst http = std.http;\n\npub fn main() !void {\nconst body = \"A\" ** 300; // \u2265 read-buffer so the read is buffer-bounded, not EOF-bounded\nconst request_bytes =\n\"POST /upload HTTP/1.1\\r\\n\" ++\n\"Host: victim\\r\\n\" ++\n\"Transfer-Encoding: chunked\\r\\n\" ++\n\"\\r\\n\" ++\n\"fffffffffffffffe\\r\\n\" ++ // chunk-size = 0xFFFF_FFFF_FFFF_FFFE = 2^64 - 2\nbody;\n\nvar in = std.Io.Reader.fixed(request_bytes);\nvar out_buf: [4096]u8 = undefined;\nvar out = std.Io.Writer.fixed(\u0026out_buf);\n\nvar server = http.Server.init(\u0026in, \u0026out);\nvar request = try server.receiveHead(); // Head.parse accepts TE:chunked\n\nvar transfer_buf: [256]u8 = undefined;\nconst br = try request.readerExpectContinue(\u0026transfer_buf);\nvar dst: [256]u8 = undefined;\n_ = try br.readSliceShort(\u0026dst); // -\u003e panic at http.zig:586}\n\n\nRoot cause: the parser accepts the full [0, 2^64-1] chunk-size domain while the reader silently assumes [0, 2^64-3]. \nSuggested fix is to reject any parsed chunk length above std.math.maxInt(u64) - 2 in ChunkParser.feed, or preferably \nimpose a sane implementation maximum far below \u201cthe heat death of RAM.\u201d Separately, Request.Head.parse should reject \nrequests containing both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding per RFC 7230 \u00a73.3.3, because accepting both and letting \nchunked win is how one accidentally becomes a boutique smuggling-adjacent artisan.\u00b2\n\nCWE-190, secondary CWE-1284, tertiary CWE-617. CVSS v3.0: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.\nCVSS v4.0: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N.\nConfidentiality and integrity are not demonstrated; availability loss is the show, the whole show, and the clown car it \narrived in.\n\n\u00b9 \u201cValid enough to enter, cursed enough to set it on fire\u201d is not yet an IETF term, but we are submitting an erratum to \nreality.\u00b2 Footnote \u00b2 exists only to prove the report has layers, like an onion, or a parser state machine written \nduring a thunderstorm.\n\nCheers!\n\nAgent Spooky\u0027s Fun Parade\n\n[agent-spooky-1.png]\n_______________________________________________\nSent through the Full Disclosure mailing list\nhttps://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure\nWeb Archives \u0026 RSS: https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            },
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-190",
              "description": "CWE-190",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            },
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-617",
              "description": "CWE-617",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T13:20:21Z",
        "orgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
        "shortName": "VULNARCHIVE"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jul/0"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jul/0"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jul/0"
        ],
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "Zig std.http chunked reader integer overflow -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "relationships": [],
          "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0047",
          "x_vulnarchive": {
            "archiveUrl": "https://vuln.freearchive.org/archive/full-disclosure/2026/Jul/0",
            "automated": true,
            "contentSha256": "ee9275e5051b4ddd56cb304c6e6cc465817417ee75fe1a18379408ee5024c147",
            "evidenceScore": 9,
            "messageId": "",
            "originalUrl": "https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2026/Jul/0",
            "policy": "vulnarchive-1",
            "sourceFormat": "text/html",
            "sourcePublishedAt": "2026-06-29T01:17:59Z"
          }
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "4e2abfbf-4a2a-4b76-a4e0-d77c18ba156c",
    "assignerShortName": "VULNARCHIVE",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-07T13:20:21Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-07T13:20:21Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1988-2026-0047"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-68383 (GCVE-0-2025-68383)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-18 22:00 – Updated: 2025-12-19 15:15
VLAI
Title
Filebeat Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input
Summary
Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) in Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor can allow a user to trigger a Buffer Overflow (CAPEC-100) and cause a denial of service (panic/crash) of the Filebeat process via either a malformed Syslog message or a malicious tokenizer pattern in the Dissect configuration.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-19 15:14 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
elastic CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 69/100 over 155 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Elastic Filebeat Affected: 7.0.0 , ≤ 7.17.29 (semver)
Affected: 8.0.0 , ≤ 8.19.8 (semver)
Affected: 9.0.0 , ≤ 9.1.8 (semver)
Affected: 9.2.0 , ≤ 9.2.2 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-68383",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-12-19T15:14:47.682734Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-19T15:15:02.819Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Filebeat",
          "vendor": "Elastic",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.17.29",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "8.19.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "8.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "9.1.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "9.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "9.2.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "9.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) in Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor can allow a user to trigger a Buffer Overflow (CAPEC-100) and cause a denial of service (panic/crash) of the Filebeat process via either a malformed Syslog message or a malicious tokenizer pattern in the Dissect configuration.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input (CWE-1285) in Filebeat Syslog parser and the Libbeat Dissect processor can allow a user to trigger a Buffer Overflow (CAPEC-100) and cause a denial of service (panic/crash) of the Filebeat process via either a malformed Syslog message or a malicious tokenizer pattern in the Dissect configuration."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-12-18T22:00:12.479Z",
        "orgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
        "shortName": "elastic"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.elastic.co/t/filebeat-8-19-9-9-1-9-and-9-2-3-security-update-esa-2025-32/384180"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "Elastic"
      },
      "title": "Filebeat Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Elastic CVE Publisher 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "271b6943-45a9-4f3a-ab4e-976f3fa05b5a",
    "assignerShortName": "elastic",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-68383",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-18T22:00:12.479Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-16T17:26:09.355Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-19T15:15:02.819Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-67901 (GCVE-0-2025-67901)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-12-14 23:50 – Updated: 2025-12-15 19:49
VLAI
Summary
openrsync through 0.5.0, as used in OpenBSD through 7.8 and on other platforms, allows a client to cause a server SIGSEGV by specifying a length of zero for block data, because the relationship between p->rem and p->len is not checked.
SSVC
Exploitation: poc Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-12-15 19:45 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
mitre CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard E 28/100 over 2324 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
kristapsdz openrsync Affected: 0 , ≤ 0.5.0 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-67901",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-12-15T19:45:46.243633Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-15T19:49:41.982Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "openrsync",
          "vendor": "kristapsdz",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "0.5.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "openrsync through 0.5.0, as used in OpenBSD through 7.8 and on other platforms, allows a client to cause a server SIGSEGV by specifying a length of zero for block data, because the relationship between p-\u003erem and p-\u003elen is not checked."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-12-14T23:57:33.595Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/kristapsdz/openrsync/issues/34"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/60b9c3dff1abf933e85e3c4d96b54201ee947513/usr.bin/rsync/blocks.c#L480-L481"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-67901",
    "datePublished": "2025-12-14T23:50:38.953Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-14T23:50:38.613Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-15T19:49:41.982Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-66660 (GCVE-0-2025-66660)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-15 02:42 – Updated: 2026-05-15 16:10
VLAI
Summary
Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_CHECK_TA_COMPAT to cause incorrect shared memory mapping, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-05-15 16:09 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
AMD CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 63/100 over 74 records in the last 180 days details
Date Public
2026-05-15 02:40
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-66660",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-05-15T16:09:50.527526Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T16:10:53.782Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 RX 6000 Series Graphics Products",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 25.12.1 (25.10.37.01)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 RX 7000 Series Graphics Products",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 25.11.1 (25.20.29.01)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 PRO W6000 Series Graphics Products",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "AMD Software: PRO Edition 25.Q4 (25.10.37.01)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 PRO W7000 Series Graphics Products",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "AMD Software: PRO Edition 25.Q3.1 (25.10.32)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI210",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 7.0.1"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI250",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 7.0.1"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI300A",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "BKC 26"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI300X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI325X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.3"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Instinct\u2122 MI308X",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "ROCm 6.4.2"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 PRO V620",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "Contact your AMD Customer Engineering representative"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "AMD Radeon\u2122 PRO V710",
          "vendor": "AMD",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "Contact your AMD Customer Engineering representative"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-05-15T02:40:46.460Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_CHECK_TA_COMPAT to cause incorrect shared memory mapping, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_CHECK_TA_COMPAT to cause incorrect shared memory mapping, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "baseScore": 1.8,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284  Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T02:44:05.001Z",
        "orgId": "b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648",
        "shortName": "AMD"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.amd.com/en/resources/product-security/bulletin/AMD-SB-6027.html"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "AMD PSIRT Automation 1.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "b58fc414-a1e4-4f92-9d70-1add41838648",
    "assignerShortName": "AMD",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-66660",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-15T02:42:33.035Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-12-06T15:03:58.970Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-15T16:10:53.782Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-61938 (GCVE-0-2025-61938)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-10-15 13:55 – Updated: 2026-02-26 16:57
VLAI
Title
BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM bd process vulnerability
Summary
When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured with a URL greater than 1024 characters in length for the Data Guard Protection Enforcement setting, either manually or through the automatic Policy Builder, the bd process can terminate repeatedly.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-10-16 03:56 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
f5 CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard B 84/100 over 87 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
F5 BIG-IP Affected: 17.5.0 , < 17.5.1 (custom)
Affected: 17.1.0 , < 17.1.3 (custom)
Unaffected: 16.1.0 , < * (custom)
Unaffected: 15.1.0 , < * (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2025-10-15 14:00
Credits
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-61938",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-10-16T03:56:55.522495Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:57:43.798Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "modules": [
            "ASM",
            "Advanced WAF"
          ],
          "product": "BIG-IP",
          "vendor": "F5",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "17.5.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "17.5.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "17.1.3",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "17.1.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "16.1.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "*",
              "status": "unaffected",
              "version": "15.1.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "F5"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2025-10-15T14:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003e\n\n\u003cspan style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\"\u003eWhen a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured with a URL greater than 1024 characters in length for the Data Guard Protection Enforcement setting, either manually or through the automatic Policy Builder, the bd process can terminate repeatedly.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003eNote: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
            }
          ],
          "value": "When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured with a URL greater than 1024 characters in length for the Data Guard Protection Enforcement setting, either manually or through the automatic Policy Builder, the bd process can terminate repeatedly.\u00a0\u00a0Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 8.7,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-10-15T13:55:47.664Z",
        "orgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
        "shortName": "f5"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000156624"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "INTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM bd process vulnerability",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "F5 SIRTBot v1.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "9dacffd4-cb11-413f-8451-fbbfd4ddc0ab",
    "assignerShortName": "f5",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-61938",
    "datePublished": "2025-10-15T13:55:47.664Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-10-03T23:04:21.120Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-02-26T16:57:43.798Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-59820 (GCVE-0-2025-59820)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-11-26 00:00 – Updated: 2025-12-06 02:32
VLAI
Summary
In KDE Krita before 5.2.13, loading a manipulated TGA file could result in a heap-based buffer overflow in plugins/impex/tga/kis_tga_import.cpp (aka KisTgaImport). Control flow proceeds even when a number of pixels becomes negative.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-11-26 16:35 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
mitre CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard E 28/100 over 2324 records in the last 180 days details
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
KDE Krita Affected: 0 , < 5.2.13 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-59820",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-11-26T16:35:03.207483Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-26T16:35:11.247Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      },
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-12-06T02:32:10.590Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/12/msg00006.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Krita",
          "vendor": "KDE",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "5.2.13",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In KDE Krita before 5.2.13, loading a manipulated TGA file could result in a heap-based buffer overflow in plugins/impex/tga/kis_tga_import.cpp (aka KisTgaImport). Control flow proceeds even when a number of pixels becomes negative."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 6.7,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-11-26T05:56:02.180Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://kde.org/info/security/advisory-20250929-1.txt"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita/-/commit/6d3651ac4df88efb68e013d21061de9846e83fe8"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-59820",
    "datePublished": "2025-11-26T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-22T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-12-06T02:32:10.590Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

CVE-2025-58835 (GCVE-0-2025-58835)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-09-05 13:45 – Updated: 2026-05-12 00:51
VLAI
Title
WordPress Bonus for Woo plugin <= 7.6.6 - Other vulnerability Type vulnerability
Summary
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in calliko Bonus for Woo bonus-for-woo allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Bonus for Woo: from n/a through <= 7.6.6.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2025-09-05 19:38 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-1284 - Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
Assigner
Patchstack CNA under the mitre root
CNA scorecard C 75/100 over 2953 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
calliko Bonus for Woo Affected: 0 , ≤ 7.6.6 (custom)
Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-04-01 16:43
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-58835",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-09-05T19:38:08.180111Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T00:51:12.333Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "bonus-for-woo",
          "product": "Bonus for Woo",
          "vendor": "calliko",
          "versions": [
            {
              "changes": [
                {
                  "at": "7.6.7",
                  "status": "unaffected"
                }
              ],
              "lessThanOrEqual": "7.6.6",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Martino Spagnuolo (r3verii) | Patchstack Bug Bounty Program"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-04-01T16:43:36.283Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in calliko Bonus for Woo bonus-for-woo allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects Bonus for Woo: from n/a through \u003c= 7.6.6.\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in calliko Bonus for Woo bonus-for-woo allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Bonus for Woo: from n/a through \u003c= 7.6.6."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-1",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-1284",
              "description": "Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-28T16:13:48.245Z",
        "orgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
        "shortName": "Patchstack"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry"
          ],
          "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/bonus-for-woo/vulnerability/wordpress-bonus-for-woo-plugin-7-4-1-other-vulnerability-type-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
        }
      ],
      "title": "WordPress Bonus for Woo plugin \u003c= 7.6.6 - Other vulnerability Type vulnerability"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "21595511-bba5-4825-b968-b78d1f9984a3",
    "assignerShortName": "Patchstack",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-58835",
    "datePublished": "2025-09-05T13:45:26.626Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-09-05T10:49:39.907Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-12T00:51:12.333Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Mitigation MIT-5
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.