CVE-2021-25082 (GCVE-0-2021-25082)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2022-02-21 10:45 – Updated: 2024-08-03 19:56- CWE-22 - Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117 | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Popup Builder – Create highly converting, mobile friendly marketing popups. |
Affected:
4.0.7 , < 4.0.7
(custom)
|
guessed |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:56:09.873Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Popup Builder \u2013 Create highly converting, mobile friendly marketing popups.",
"vendor": "Unknown",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.0.7",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.0.7",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "JrXnm"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not validate and sanitise the sgpb_type parameter before using it in a require statement, leading to a Local File Inclusion issue. Furthermore, since the beginning of the string can be controlled, the issue can lead to RCE vulnerability via wrappers such as PHAR"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-22",
"description": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2022-02-21T10:45:51.000Z",
"orgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"shortName": "WPScan"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Popup Builder \u003c 4.0.7 - LFI to RCE",
"x_generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-25082",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "Popup Builder \u003c 4.0.7 - LFI to RCE"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Popup Builder \u2013 Create highly converting, mobile friendly marketing popups.",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "4.0.7",
"version_value": "4.0.7"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Unknown"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "JrXnm"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not validate and sanitise the sgpb_type parameter before using it in a require statement, leading to a Local File Inclusion issue. Furthermore, since the beginning of the string can be controlled, the issue can lead to RCE vulnerability via wrappers such as PHAR"
}
]
},
"generator": "WPScan CVE Generator",
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (\u0027Path Traversal\u0027)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132"
},
{
"name": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1bfdd5d7-9bf6-4a53-96ea-42e2716d7a81",
"assignerShortName": "WPScan",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-25082",
"datePublished": "2022-02-21T10:45:51.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2021-01-14T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T19:56:09.873Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2021-25082",
"date": "2026-11-10",
"epss": "0.05229",
"percentile": "0.92585"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:sygnoos:popup_builder:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4D698325-F34E-4DA6-A031-6B0814E68705",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.0.7",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Popup Builder WordPress plugin before 4.0.7 does not validate and sanitise the sgpb_type parameter before using it in a require statement, leading to a Local File Inclusion issue. Furthermore, since the beginning of the string can be controlled, the issue can lead to RCE vulnerability via wrappers such as PHAR"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin Popup Builder de WordPress versiones anteriores a 4.0.7, no comprueba ni sanea el par\u00e1metro sgpb_type antes de usarlo en una sentencia require, lo que conlleva un problema de inclusi\u00f3n de archivos locales. Adem\u00e1s, dado que el comienzo de la cadena puede ser controlado, el problema puede conllevar a una vulnerabilidad RCE por medio de wrappers como PHAR"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2021-25082",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:54:18.970",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "SINGLE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.8,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2022-02-21T11:15:08.757",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"tags": [
"Release Notes",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117"
},
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Release Notes",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2659117"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0f90f10c-4b0a-46da-ac1f-aa6a03312132"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-22"
}
],
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"redhat_vex": {
"current_release_date": "2026-03-27T14:35:35+00:00",
"cve": "CVE-2021-25082",
"id": "CVE-2021-25082",
"initial_release_date": "2021-01-01T00:00:00+00:00",
"product_status:known_not_affected": "1",
"source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
"status": "final",
"title": "Popup Builder \u003c 4.0.7 - LFI to RCE",
"url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2021/cve-2021-25082.json",
"version": "3"
}
}
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.