PYSEC-2021-426

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-11-09 22:15 - Updated: 2021-11-16 03:58
VLAI?
Details

The verify function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (ecdsa-python) 2.0.0 fails to check that the signature is non-zero, which allows attackers to forge signatures on arbitrary messages.

Impacted products
Name purl
starkbank-ecdsa pkg:pypi/starkbank-ecdsa

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "starkbank-ecdsa",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/starkbank-ecdsa"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.0.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.1",
        "0.1.1",
        "0.1.2",
        "0.1.3",
        "0.1.4",
        "0.1.5",
        "0.1.6",
        "0.1.7",
        "0.1.8",
        "0.1.9",
        "1.0.0",
        "1.1.0",
        "1.1.1",
        "2.0.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-43572",
    "GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3"
  ],
  "details": "The verify function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (ecdsa-python) 2.0.0 fails to check that the signature is non-zero, which allows attackers to forge signatures on arbitrary messages.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2021-426",
  "modified": "2021-11-16T03:58:45.828098Z",
  "published": "2021-11-09T22:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://research.nccgroup.com/2021/11/08/technical-advisory-arbitrary-signature-forgery-in-stark-bank-ecdsa-libraries/"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/starkbank/ecdsa-python/releases/tag/v2.0.1"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…