osv-2021-670
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-04-22 00:00
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in av1_free_cdef_buffers
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=33480

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 8
Crash state:
av1_free_cdef_buffers
decoder_destroy
aom_codec_destroy

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "MEDIUM"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "libaom"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "f194981140e5a19a209bcb16333f1db1ecde5599"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "80bd452152ec39b7d88bded3d9090fb20b1ba12f"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://aomedia.googlesource.com/aom",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=33480\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 8\nCrash state:\nav1_free_cdef_buffers\ndecoder_destroy\naom_codec_destroy\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2021-670",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:39.463330Z",
  "published": "2021-04-22T00:00:12.948723Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=33480"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in av1_free_cdef_buffers"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…