osv-2021-1168
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-08-25 00:01
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in exif_get_slong
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=37570

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1
Crash state:
exif_get_slong
exif_get_long
exif_get_rational

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "MEDIUM"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "libexif"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "ce946b93dfd34b2187d9f9fb01603943fbb32137"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "a4647a5463102c4b0c5a02461edd4cc085dfc1b6"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/libexif/libexif",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=37570\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 1\nCrash state:\nexif_get_slong\nexif_get_long\nexif_get_rational\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2021-1168",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:40.883862Z",
  "published": "2021-08-25T00:01:25.325827Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=37570"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in exif_get_slong"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…