mal-2025-3740
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2025-05-10 14:05
Modified
2025-12-11 09:27
Summary
Malicious code in badgerdoc-storage (PyPI)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: kam193 (57170ed58e2cf5e3b4b32f443ae555c7c040f2a395b3505837c90e06add93db5)

Packages that seem to be created by a legit bug bounty hunter. Designed to look like created by different organisations, they contain a couple of data exfiltration (including all env variables) and potential remote code execution (though the URL seems not to serve any code).


Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.

Campaign: 2025-05-sl4x01

Reasons (based on the campaign):

  • The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.

  • exfiltration-env-variables

  • impersonation

Source: ossf-package-analysis (e4cb1d64c1adc71d974cdd0d7efad753262eb0a666d9f284d988aaae9c506ff0)

The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'badgerdoc-storage' @ 0.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.

It is considered malicious because:

  • The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "badgerdoc-storage"
      },
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/kam193",
        "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
      ],
      "name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
      "type": "REPORTER"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
        "https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
      ],
      "name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
      "type": "FINDER"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://www.reversinglabs.com"
      ],
      "name": "ReversingLabs",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "iocs": {
      "domains": [
        "sl4x0.xyz"
      ]
    },
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "import_time": "2025-05-12T00:25:55.497333133Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-05-10T14:05:58Z",
        "sha256": "e4cb1d64c1adc71d974cdd0d7efad753262eb0a666d9f284d988aaae9c506ff0",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "RLMA-2025-02557",
        "import_time": "2025-05-22T14:06:34.216433136Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-05-22T12:33:26Z",
        "sha256": "82498338aaf394016668c3918c1ecfe4c6120ca5ae5146092116a2c504dd6a65",
        "source": "reversing-labs",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "pypi/2025-05-sl4x01/badgerdoc-storage",
        "import_time": "2025-12-02T22:30:54.970498227Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-05-10T17:59:53Z",
        "ranges": [
          {
            "events": [
              {
                "introduced": "0"
              }
            ],
            "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
          }
        ],
        "sha256": "52d2568604219dbc8a4a48c917a0f707bf57ccb7963033a6caa3f2b0e34a8901",
        "source": "kam193"
      },
      {
        "id": "pypi/2025-05-sl4x01/badgerdoc-storage",
        "import_time": "2025-12-02T23:07:18.006415526Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-05-10T17:59:53Z",
        "ranges": [
          {
            "events": [
              {
                "introduced": "0"
              }
            ],
            "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
          }
        ],
        "sha256": "57170ed58e2cf5e3b4b32f443ae555c7c040f2a395b3505837c90e06add93db5",
        "source": "kam193"
      },
      {
        "id": "pypi/2025-05-sl4x01/badgerdoc-storage",
        "import_time": "2025-12-10T21:38:57.307882908Z",
        "modified_time": "2025-05-10T17:59:53Z",
        "sha256": "b1ab3d93c1ab3b2d0072d4b6d0a5ebc639457b6837449894a2a0780782fc1440",
        "source": "kam193",
        "versions": [
          "0.0.1"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (57170ed58e2cf5e3b4b32f443ae555c7c040f2a395b3505837c90e06add93db5)\nPackages that seem to be created by a legit bug bounty hunter. Designed to look like created by different organisations, they contain a couple of data exfiltration (including all env variables) and potential remote code execution (though the URL seems not to serve any code).\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2025-05-sl4x01\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.\n\n\n - exfiltration-env-variables\n\n\n - impersonation\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (e4cb1d64c1adc71d974cdd0d7efad753262eb0a666d9f284d988aaae9c506ff0)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027badgerdoc-storage\u0027 @ 0.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
  "id": "MAL-2025-3740",
  "modified": "2025-12-11T09:27:52Z",
  "published": "2025-05-10T14:05:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/sl4x0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/badgerdoc-storage"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in badgerdoc-storage (PyPI)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…