mal-2025-3006
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: kam193 (221affa8a84428ae21f288ce299d114742d269e7bbcbf223a0aa666327fae2c4)
This campaign is built from two parts: 1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends "date" to a remote server, 2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients
Apparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).
Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.
Campaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
clones-real-package
-
action-hidden-in-lib-usage
-
The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package
-
exfiltration-cloud-tokens
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tcloud-python-test",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/tcloud-python-test"
},
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"SNYK-PYTHON-TCLOUDPYTHONTEST-12201353"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
"type": "ANALYST"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://www.reversinglabs.com"
],
"name": "ReversingLabs",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"iocs": {
"domains": [
"checktimeserver.org",
"aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz"
],
"urls": [
"https://api.checktimeserver.org/",
"https://api.aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz/"
]
},
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"id": "RLMA-2025-02005",
"import_time": "2025-03-31T07:07:06.980236897Z",
"modified_time": "2025-03-28T13:06:22Z",
"sha256": "b4be4b1ed6050855e2f9c6b1bfa0a9cd4c34a16211339ae604603d0e6aed6ba1",
"source": "reversing-labs",
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
},
{
"id": "RLUA-2025-04811",
"import_time": "2025-09-26T11:06:10.935474543Z",
"modified_time": "2025-09-26T09:14:39Z",
"sha256": "5852c723e0b065d1baa10c7bf39fcc721dc7670afb0d2b0e6a2b3cdfb2ec75ca",
"source": "reversing-labs"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/tcloud-python-test",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T22:30:55.629158524Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "dfd60357d0f2edeef38c986940b03ad4707313ad64a7ff32fa9a7e6140b08f28",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/tcloud-python-test",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T23:07:18.670693612Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "221affa8a84428ae21f288ce299d114742d269e7bbcbf223a0aa666327fae2c4",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/tcloud-python-test",
"import_time": "2025-12-10T21:38:57.857154991Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"sha256": "d59dfeaf84ba550b8e71f5efae21f11364439f657c8e1c4d47c57b5f8609ca13",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"1.0.0"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (221affa8a84428ae21f288ce299d114742d269e7bbcbf223a0aa666327fae2c4)\nThis campaign is built from two parts:\n1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends \"date\" to a remote server,\n2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients\n\nApparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - clones-real-package\n\n\n - action-hidden-in-lib-usage\n\n\n - The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package\n\n\n - exfiltration-cloud-tokens\n",
"id": "MAL-2025-3006",
"modified": "2025-12-11T09:27:54Z",
"published": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://x.com/ReversingLabs/status/1900198602242204003"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-TCLOUDPYTHONTEST-12201353"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/malicious-pypi-packages-stole-cloud.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/tcloud-python-test"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in tcloud-python-test (PyPI)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.