mal-2025-2929
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: kam193 (4900ca27e14ecb6f022a740bd420fa046084355344379dd21a2b59c53d1c95f1)
This campaign is built from two parts: 1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends "date" to a remote server, 2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients
Apparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).
Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.
Campaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
clones-real-package
-
action-hidden-in-lib-usage
-
The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package
-
exfiltration-cloud-tokens
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "acloud-client",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/acloud-client"
},
"versions": [
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"SNYK-PYTHON-ACLOUDCLIENT-12201342"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
"type": "ANALYST"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://www.reversinglabs.com"
],
"name": "ReversingLabs",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"iocs": {
"domains": [
"checktimeserver.org",
"aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz"
],
"urls": [
"https://api.checktimeserver.org/",
"https://api.aliyun-sdk-requests.xyz/"
]
},
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"id": "RLMA-2025-01927",
"import_time": "2025-03-31T07:07:04.279224028Z",
"modified_time": "2025-03-28T13:05:14Z",
"sha256": "8afb489b46a4e95c11871dd065c618b98b6ff82565c0c1b7decb2a0835c125e4",
"source": "reversing-labs",
"versions": [
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1"
]
},
{
"id": "RLUA-2025-04742",
"import_time": "2025-09-26T11:06:09.882703014Z",
"modified_time": "2025-09-26T09:13:42Z",
"sha256": "a468d481d3efdbe0a84f9814bf6d236de3b81b2130c29d5ff2529d6bdb99136d",
"source": "reversing-labs"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/acloud-client",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T22:30:54.883075217Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "04172dc499bf944e284ffb4a9f4d39fd379030b2ecbf8eada5ba703de258c0c4",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/acloud-client",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T23:07:17.926110867Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "4900ca27e14ecb6f022a740bd420fa046084355344379dd21a2b59c53d1c95f1",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/acloud-client",
"import_time": "2025-12-10T21:38:57.235650788Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"sha256": "e5991c849c24976979baaed6c5f337f0aaf2275d2cc990c5ad67490d51ac9b3c",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1"
]
},
{
"id": "pypi/2025-02-alicloud-client/acloud-client",
"import_time": "2026-01-30T19:43:58.375637454Z",
"modified_time": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"sha256": "295499a062b9795f707cc8c78d8420d6681fbc0094cba06c6c4eda699f547b4e",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (4900ca27e14ecb6f022a740bd420fa046084355344379dd21a2b59c53d1c95f1)\nThis campaign is built from two parts:\n1) packages named like time-check-server, snapshot-photo contain an innocent-looking code that sends \"date\" to a remote server,\n2) packages named like alicloud-client are clones of legit aliyun-python-sdk-core package, with a small change in the client.py code, where it imports the time-check-server and calls it, but instead of a date, the credentials to the cloud are exfiltrated. There are also variations with AWS clients\n\nApparently, the campaign started at least 2 years ago with the snapshot-photo package containing the same functionality as the newer time-check-server (see https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py).\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2025-02-alicloud-client\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - clones-real-package\n\n\n - action-hidden-in-lib-usage\n\n\n - The malicious code is intentionally included in a dependency of the package\n\n\n - exfiltration-cloud-tokens\n",
"id": "MAL-2025-2929",
"modified": "2026-01-30T19:45:45Z",
"published": "2025-02-25T18:18:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://x.com/ReversingLabs/status/1900198602242204003"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-ACLOUDCLIENT-12201342"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pypi-data/pypi-mirror-238/blob/code/packages/snapshot-photo/snapshot_photo-0.0.3-py3-none-any.whl/snapshot_photo/date_format.py"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/malicious-pypi-packages-stole-cloud.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/acloud-client"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in acloud-client (PyPI)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.