mal-2024-12270
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: kam193 (ef713dc551a4b2eb9b0c94b270f4c214aa90e688076e15bb263b3bb5f3b8484b)
Package imitates the legitimate fake-useragent, however it has a few suspicious additions: fake.py L149 calls a function from 'urllib2' module, which contains a code attempting to JSON-deserialize encoded code. This is a pickle executing os.system(id), which of course isn't executed by json.loads, but would be by pickle. Also: action is suspicious, not really malicious, but the package is a clear typosquatting attempt.
Category: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research & co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.
Campaign: 2024-10-old-fake-usreagant
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
action-hidden-in-lib-usage
-
clones-real-package
-
typosquatting
-
dependency-confusion
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "fake-usreagant"
},
"versions": [
"0.0.3"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
"type": "REPORTER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"id": "pypi/2024-10-old-fake-usreagant/fake-usreagant",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T22:30:56.02420032Z",
"modified_time": "2024-10-08T10:29:47Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "de00b37f49e2ff19849cb3269e70e2ad85aefca4a3a84f75aa1ad1bffec9cf3d",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-10-old-fake-usreagant/fake-usreagant",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T23:07:19.222983563Z",
"modified_time": "2024-10-08T10:29:47Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "ef713dc551a4b2eb9b0c94b270f4c214aa90e688076e15bb263b3bb5f3b8484b",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-10-old-fake-usreagant/fake-usreagant",
"import_time": "2025-12-10T21:38:58.364758916Z",
"modified_time": "2024-10-08T10:29:47Z",
"sha256": "5d26cc05453bac24155479cf8ef3bd0bff5a647bdfec50efdec5e27e634361a1",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"0.0.3"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (ef713dc551a4b2eb9b0c94b270f4c214aa90e688076e15bb263b3bb5f3b8484b)\nPackage imitates the legitimate fake-useragent, however it has a few suspicious additions: fake.py L149 calls a function from \u0027urllib2\u0027 module, which contains a code attempting to JSON-deserialize encoded code. This is a pickle executing os.system(id), which of course isn\u0027t executed by json.loads, but would be by pickle. Also: action is suspicious, not really malicious, but the package is a clear typosquatting attempt.\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: PROBABLY_PENTEST - Packages looking like typical pentest packages, but also anything that looks like testing, exploring pre-prepared kits, research \u0026 co, with clearly low-harm possibilities.\n\n\nCampaign: 2024-10-old-fake-usreagant\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - action-hidden-in-lib-usage\n\n\n - clones-real-package\n\n\n - typosquatting\n\n\n - dependency-confusion\n",
"id": "MAL-2024-12270",
"modified": "2025-12-11T09:27:53Z",
"published": "2024-10-08T10:29:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/fake-usreagant"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in fake-usreagant (PyPI)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.