GSD-2016-5672

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2016-5672
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2016-5672",
    "description": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
    "id": "GSD-2016-5672"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2016-5672"
      ],
      "details": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
      "id": "GSD-2016-5672",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:25.143632Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2016-5672",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
          },
          {
            "name": "92199",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "[crosswalk-help] 20160728 Crosswalk Security Advisory",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "20160729 CVE-2016-5672: Intel Crosswalk SSL Prompt Issue",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "VU#217871",
            "refsource": "CERT-VN",
            "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:intel:crosswalk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "19.49.514.4",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-5672"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-310"
                },
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-20"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
            },
            {
              "name": "[crosswalk-help] 20160728 Crosswalk Security Advisory",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Permissions Required",
                "Technical Description"
              ],
              "url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
            },
            {
              "name": "VU#217871",
              "refsource": "CERT-VN",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "US Government Resource"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "92199",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
            },
            {
              "name": "20160729 CVE-2016-5672: Intel Crosswalk SSL Prompt Issue",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.8,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 4.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 8.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 5.2
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-09T20:00Z",
      "publishedDate": "2016-08-01T02:59Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.