GSD-2015-7268

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:20
Details
Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a "Forced Restart Attack."
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2015-7268
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2015-7268",
    "description": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\"",
    "id": "GSD-2015-7268"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2015-7268"
      ],
      "details": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\"",
      "id": "GSD-2015-7268",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:01.475787Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2015-7268",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\""
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:samsung:850_pro_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:samsung:850_pro:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "cpe_match": [],
            "operator": "AND"
          },
          {
            "children": [
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:samsung:pm851_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:samsung:pm851:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "cpe_match": [],
            "operator": "AND"
          },
          {
            "children": [
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt015_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt015:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "cpe_match": [],
            "operator": "AND"
          },
          {
            "children": [
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:seagate:st500lt025_firmware:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              },
              {
                "children": [],
                "cpe_match": [
                  {
                    "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:seagate:st500lt025:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "cpe_name": [],
                    "vulnerable": false
                  }
                ],
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ],
            "cpe_match": [],
            "operator": "AND"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2015-7268"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Samsung 850 Pro and PM851 solid-state drives and Seagate ST500LT015 and ST500LT025 hard disk drives, when used on Windows and operating in Opal mode on Lenovo ThinkPad T440s laptops with BIOS 2.32 or ThinkPad W541 laptops with BIOS 2.21, or in Opal or eDrive mode on Dell Latitude E6410 laptops with BIOS A16 or Latitude E6430 laptops with BIOS A16, allow physically proximate attackers to bypass self-encrypting drive (SED) protection by triggering a soft reset and booting from an alternative OS, aka a \"Forced Restart Attack.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-254"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Technical Description",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.infoworld.com/article/3004913/encryption/self-encrypting-drives-are-hardly-any-better-than-software-based-encryption.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Technical Description",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-15/materials/eu-15-Boteanu-Bypassing-Self-Encrypting-Drives-SED-In-Enterprise-Environments-wp.pdf"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 1.9,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.4,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "LOW",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.2,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 0.5,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2017-12-20T23:24Z",
      "publishedDate": "2017-11-27T22:29Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.