GSD-2006-1902

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19
Details
fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is "not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value."
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2006-1902
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2006-1902",
    "description": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\"",
    "id": "GSD-2006-1902",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-1902.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2006-1902"
      ],
      "details": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\"",
      "id": "GSD-2006-1902",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:54.775164Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2006-1902",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
          },
          {
            "name": "20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
            "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
          },
          {
            "name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
          },
          {
            "name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:gnu:gcc:4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2006-1902"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\""
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-119"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060418 Re: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
            },
            {
              "name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug c/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "[gcc-bugs] 20060417 [Bug middle-end/27180] New: pointer arithmetic overflow handling broken",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060418 RE: gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
            },
            {
              "name": "20060417 gcc 4.1 bug miscompiles pointer range checks, may place you at risk",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 2.1,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "LOW",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-18T16:37Z",
      "publishedDate": "2006-04-20T10:02Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.