{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.8.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "ciguard"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.6.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.8.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44219"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T22:17:43Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nBoth SCA HTTP clients (`src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/osv.py` and `src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/endoflife.py`) call `payload = json.loads(resp.read().decode(\u0027utf-8\u0027))` without a maximum-bytes cap. A hostile or compromised endoflife.date / OSV.dev (or a successful TLS MITM) could return a multi-GB response, exhausting the ciguard process\u0027s memory.\n\n## Threat scenario\n\nciguard process memory exhaustion \u2192 OOM kill or system swap thrash. Realistic when ciguard runs in CI with a limited memory budget (typical: 4-8 GB). No data integrity or confidentiality impact.\n\n**Realism caveat:** both URLs are hardcoded HTTPS, so this is a low-realism threat (HTTPS prevents MITM unless the attacker controls a trusted CA or hijacks DNS in a way that doesn\u0027t trigger cert validation). The unbounded read is structural defence-in-depth, not a directly exploitable bug today.\n\n## Patch\n\n- New `MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES = 5 * 1024 * 1024` (5 MB) constant in both modules.\n- `body = resp.read(MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES + 1)` with overflow check returns `None` (caller falls back to stale cache).\n- 3 regression tests in `tests/test_sca_rules.py::TestSCAResponseSizeCap`.\n\n## Discovery\n\nFound during ciguard\u0027s first self-conducted pentest cycle, 2026-04-26.\n\n## CVSS Scoring\n\n- CVSS v3.1: `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L` \u2014 3.7 (Low)\n- CVSS v4.0: `CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N` \u2014 first.org calc 3.1 (Low); GitHub\u0027s calc 6.3 (Medium). Vector is correct \u2014 choosing v3.1 as the structured score keeps the consistent Low rating across consumers.\n\n## Reproduction\n\nMonkey-patch `urllib.request.urlopen` to return a fake 50 MB response; observe memory growth before/after the call. Pre-fix: process memory grows by ~50 MB. Post-fix: `_fetch` returns `None`, memory growth bounded to MAX_RESPONSE_BYTES.\n\n## Resources\n\n- Fix released in [v0.8.2](https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard/releases/tag/v0.8.2)\n- CI regression gate added in [v0.8.3](https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard/releases/tag/v0.8.3)",
  "id": "GHSA-xw8c-rrvx-f7xq",
  "modified": "2026-05-05T22:17:43Z",
  "published": "2026-05-05T22:17:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard/security/advisories/GHSA-xw8c-rrvx-f7xq"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard/releases/tag/v0.8.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Jo-Jo98/ciguard/releases/tag/v0.8.3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "ciguard: SCA HTTP client reads response body without size cap"
}