GHSA-XRCR-GMF5-2R8J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-05 19:26 – Updated: 2026-03-05 22:28
VLAI
Summary
Gogs: Stored XSS via data URI in issue comments
Details

Summary

A Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the comment and issue description functionality. The application's HTML sanitizer explicitly allows data: URI schemes, enabling authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript execution via malicious links.

Details

The vulnerability is located in internal/markup/sanitizer.go. The application uses the bluemonday HTML sanitizer but explicitly weakens the security policy by allowing the data URL scheme:

// internal/markup/sanitizer.go
func NewSanitizer() {
    sanitizer.init.Do(func() {
        // ...
        // Data URLs
        sanitizer.policy.AllowURLSchemes("data")
        // ...
    })
}

While the Markdown renderer rewrites relative links (mitigating standard Markdown [link](data:...) attacks), Gogs supports Raw HTML input. Raw HTML anchor tags bypass the Markdown parser's link rewriting and are processed directly by the sanitizer. Since the sanitizer is configured to allow data: URIs, payloads like <a href="data:text/html..."> are rendered as-is.

PoC

  1. Create a file named exploit.md in a repository.
  2. Add the following content (Raw HTML): html <a href="data:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgnWFNTJyk8L3NjcmlwdD4=">Click me for XSS</a>
  3. Commit and push the file.
  4. Navigate to the file in the Gogs web interface.
  5. Click the "Click me for XSS" link.
  6. Result: An alert box with "XSS" appears, executing the JavaScript payload.

Impact

This is a Stored XSS vulnerability. Any user who views the malicious comment and clicks the link will execute the attacker-supplied JavaScript in their browser context. This allows attackers to: * Steal authentication cookies and session tokens. * Perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the victim (e.g., modifying repositories, adding collaborators). * Redirect users to malicious sites.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.14.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "gogs.io/gogs"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.14.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-26022"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-05T19:26:02Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-05T19:16:03Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the comment and issue description functionality. The application\u0027s HTML sanitizer explicitly allows `data:` URI schemes, enabling authenticated users to inject arbitrary JavaScript execution via malicious links.\n\n### Details\nThe vulnerability is located in `internal/markup/sanitizer.go`. The application uses the `bluemonday` HTML sanitizer but explicitly weakens the security policy by allowing the `data` URL scheme:\n\n```go\n// internal/markup/sanitizer.go\nfunc NewSanitizer() {\n    sanitizer.init.Do(func() {\n        // ...\n        // Data URLs\n        sanitizer.policy.AllowURLSchemes(\"data\")\n        // ...\n    })\n}\n```\n\nWhile the Markdown renderer rewrites relative links (mitigating standard Markdown `[link](data:...)` attacks), Gogs supports **Raw HTML** input. Raw HTML anchor tags bypass the Markdown parser\u0027s link rewriting and are processed directly by the sanitizer. Since the sanitizer is configured to allow `data:` URIs, payloads like `\u003ca href=\"data:text/html...\"\u003e` are rendered as-is.\n\n### PoC\n1.  Create a file named `exploit.md` in a repository.\n2.  Add the following content (Raw HTML):\n    ```html\n    \u003ca href=\"data:text/html;base64,PHNjcmlwdD5hbGVydCgnWFNTJyk8L3NjcmlwdD4=\"\u003eClick me for XSS\u003c/a\u003e\n    ```\n3.  Commit and push the file.\n4.  Navigate to the file in the Gogs web interface.\n5.  Click the \"Click me for XSS\" link.\n6.  **Result:** An alert box with \"XSS\" appears, executing the JavaScript payload.\n\n### Impact\nThis is a **Stored XSS** vulnerability. Any user who views the malicious comment and clicks the link will execute the attacker-supplied JavaScript in their browser context. This allows attackers to:\n*   Steal authentication cookies and session tokens.\n*   Perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the victim (e.g., modifying repositories, adding collaborators).\n*   Redirect users to malicious sites.",
  "id": "GHSA-xrcr-gmf5-2r8j",
  "modified": "2026-03-05T22:28:35Z",
  "published": "2026-03-05T19:26:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/security/advisories/GHSA-xrcr-gmf5-2r8j"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-26022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/pull/8174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/commit/441c64d7bd8893b2f4e48660a8be3a7472e14291"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gogs/gogs/releases/tag/v0.14.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Gogs: Stored XSS via data URI in issue comments"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.