GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-XGPC-Q5WR-Q4V5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdkfd: fix list_del corruption in kfd_criu_resume_svm

The cleanup tail of kfd_criu_resume_svm() walks svms->criu_svm_metadata_list and kfree()s each struct criu_svm_metadata without removing it from the list. The list head is left pointing at freed kmalloc-96 objects.

A second AMDKFD_IOC_CRIU_OP from the same process re-enters: list_empty() reads the dangling ->next (use-after-free), the loop walks freed entries, and each is kfree()'d again (double-free). This is reachable by an unprivileged render-group user via /dev/kfd with no capabilities required.

Add list_del() before the kfree() so the list is properly emptied. The list_for_each_entry_safe() iterator already caches the next pointer, so unlinking during the walk is safe.

(cherry picked from commit 6322d278a298e2c1430b9d2697743d3a04b788b1)

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72449"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:18Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdkfd: fix list_del corruption in kfd_criu_resume_svm\n\nThe cleanup tail of kfd_criu_resume_svm() walks\nsvms-\u003ecriu_svm_metadata_list and kfree()s each struct criu_svm_metadata\nwithout removing it from the list. The list head is left pointing at\nfreed kmalloc-96 objects.\n\nA second AMDKFD_IOC_CRIU_OP from the same process re-enters: list_empty()\nreads the dangling -\u003enext (use-after-free), the loop walks freed entries,\nand each is kfree()\u0027d again (double-free). This is reachable by an\nunprivileged render-group user via /dev/kfd with no capabilities required.\n\nAdd list_del() before the kfree() so the list is properly emptied. The\nlist_for_each_entry_safe() iterator already caches the next pointer, so\nunlinking during the walk is safe.\n\n(cherry picked from commit 6322d278a298e2c1430b9d2697743d3a04b788b1)",
  "id": "GHSA-xgpc-q5wr-q4v5",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:30Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72449"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/506e635aed05dbdeef11e3c59f6e42980cda5b6d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/838b57b3e7ce8cce0fda56d0861add3d464dd6c8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fa5655da368d0306c03e9dc9cda8ae2a7840926"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96ac562a9ea3020981f536384711190841c81aa8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c8a8d350a273c005a48c64c4519d21b2a51c5ceb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e33a3bd5cb8d0cf1557dee014115f812c9686130"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…