GHSA-XGC7-JMVJ-5FPH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:14 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:14
VLAI?
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in Interchange 5.0.1 allows attackers 4.9.3, 5.0 before 5.0.2, and 5.2, when a catalog has been created using the (1) "mike", (2) "standard", or (3) "foundation" demo, allows attackers to inject Interchange Tag Language (ITL) elements into the forum/submit.html page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-3073"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-09-27T19:03:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Interchange 5.0.1 allows attackers 4.9.3, 5.0 before 5.0.2, and 5.2, when a catalog has been created using the (1) \"mike\", (2) \"standard\", or (3) \"foundation\" demo, allows attackers to inject Interchange Tag Language (ITL) elements into the forum/submit.html page.",
"id": "GHSA-xgc7-jmvj-5fph",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:14:14Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:14:14Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3073"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/22387"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16923"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.icdevgroup.org/pipermail/interchange-announce/2005/000049.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.icdevgroup.org/pipermail/interchange-announce/2005/000050.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/19653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14931"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…