GHSA-XF7F-CC8G-G539
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:01 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:01
VLAI?
Details
Format string vulnerability in gxine 0.4.1 through 0.4.4, and other versions down to 0.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a ram file with a URL whose hostname contains format string specifiers.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-1692"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-05-24T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Format string vulnerability in gxine 0.4.1 through 0.4.4, and other versions down to 0.3, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a ram file with a URL whose hostname contains format string specifiers.",
"id": "GHSA-xf7f-cc8g-g539",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:01:01Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:01:01Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1692"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xine/gnome-xine/ChangeLog?rev=HEAD\u0026content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111670637812128\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/15451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200505-19.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.0xbadexworm.org/adv/gxinefmt.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/16747"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/0626"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…