GHSA-XC55-QHGH-QJG9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:02 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:43
VLAI?
Details
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Topaz Systems SigPlus Pro ActiveX Control 3.95, and possibly other versions before 4.29, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) KeyString property, (2) NewPath parameter to the SetLocalIniFilePath method, or (3) NewPortPath parameter to the SetTabletPortPath method.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-0324"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-02-07T21:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Topaz Systems SigPlus Pro ActiveX Control 3.95, and possibly other versions before 4.29, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long (1) KeyString property, (2) NewPath parameter to the SetLocalIniFilePath method, or (3) NewPortPath parameter to the SetTabletPortPath method.",
"id": "GHSA-xc55-qhgh-qjg9",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:43:46Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:02:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0324"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65114"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65116"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42800"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46128"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…