GHSA-X2MF-686W-VJJW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:20 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:20
VLAI?
Details
Memory leak in TIBCO Rendezvous (RV) daemon (rvd) 7.5.2, 7.5.3 and 7.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a packet with a length field of zero, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-2830.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4158"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-08-03T21:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Memory leak in TIBCO Rendezvous (RV) daemon (rvd) 7.5.2, 7.5.3 and 7.5.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a packet with a length field of zero, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-2830.",
"id": "GHSA-x2mf-686w-vjjw",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:20:45Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:20:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4158"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2007-07/0620.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/37680"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26337"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2007-December/001855.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.irmplc.com/content/pdfs/Security_Testing_Enterprise_Messaging_Systems.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/111-Vendor-Alerts"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.irmplc.com/index.php/160-Advisory-025"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25132"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018512"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2814"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…