GHSA-WX8Q-4GM9-RJ2G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-15 16:35 – Updated: 2025-04-09 19:58
VLAI?
Summary
Fluid vulnerable to OS Command Injection for Fluid Users with JuicefsRuntime
Details

Impact

OS command injection vulnerability within the Fluid project's JuicefsRuntime can potentially allow an authenticated user, who has the authority to create or update the K8s CRD Dataset/JuicefsRuntime, to execute arbitrary OS commands within the juicefs related containers. This could lead to unauthorized access, modification or deletion of data.

Patches

For users who're using version < 0.9.3 with JuicefsRuntime， upgrade to v0.9.3.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Credits

Special thanks to the discovers of this issue:

Xiaozheng Zhang xiaozheng_zhang@outlook.com

Severity ?
4.0 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.9.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-51699"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-03-15T16:35:11Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-15T19:15:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nOS command injection vulnerability within the Fluid project\u0027s JuicefsRuntime can potentially allow an authenticated user, who has the authority to create or update the K8s CRD Dataset/JuicefsRuntime, to execute arbitrary OS commands within the juicefs related containers. This could lead to unauthorized access, modification or deletion of data.\n\n### Patches\nFor users who\u0027re using version \u003c 0.9.3 with JuicefsRuntime\uff0c upgrade to v0.9.3.\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n\n### Credits\n\nSpecial thanks to the discovers of this issue:\n\nXiaozheng Zhang [xiaozheng_zhang@outlook.com](xiaozheng_zhang@outlook.com)",
  "id": "GHSA-wx8q-4gm9-rj2g",
  "modified": "2025-04-09T19:58:59Z",
  "published": "2024-03-15T16:35:11Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/security/advisories/GHSA-wx8q-4gm9-rj2g"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-51699"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/commit/02b7cd8b79a26092df95d625664994bda485c722"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid/commit/e0184cff8790ad000c3e8943392c7f544fad7d66"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/fluid-cloudnative/fluid"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Fluid vulnerable to OS Command Injection for Fluid Users with JuicefsRuntime"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.