GHSA-W7JW-Q4FG-QC4C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-05-24 17:30 – Updated: 2024-05-20 21:52
VLAI?
Summary
nfpm has incorrect default permissions
Details

Summary

When building packages directly from source control, file permissions on the checked-in files are not maintained.

Details

When building packages directly from source control, file permissions on the checked-in files are not maintained. When nfpm packaged the files (without extra config for enforcing its own permissions) files could go out with bad permissions (chmod 666 or 777).

PoC

Create a default nfpm structure.

Within the test folder, create 3 files named chmod-XXX.sh. Each script has file permissions set corresponding with their file names (chmod-777.sh = chmod 777). Below each file and permissions can be seen.

$ ls -lart test 
total 24
-rwxrwxrwx   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:15 chmod-777.sh
-rw-rw-rw-   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:16 chmod-666.sh
drwxr-xr-x   5 user  group  160 May 19 13:19 .
-rw-rw-r--   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:19 chmod-664.sh
drwxr-xr-x  10 user  group  320 May 19 13:29 ..

Below is the snippet nfpm configuration file of the contents of the package. The test folder and files has no extra config for enforcing permissions.

contents:
- src: foo-binary
  dst: /usr/bin/bar
- src: bar-config.conf
  dst: /etc/foo-binary/bar-config.conf
  type: config
- src: test
  dst: /etc/test/scripts

The next step is to create a deb package.

$ nfpm package -p deb # Create dep package
using deb packager...
created package: foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb

When on a Ubuntu VM, install the foo package which was created

$ sudo dpkg -i foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb # Installing deb package within Ubuntu
Selecting previously unselected package foo.
(Reading database ... 67540 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb ...
Unpacking foo (1.0.0) ...
Setting up foo (1.0.0) ...

Looking at /etc/test/scripts and viewing the permissions. Permissions are passed exactly the same as the source.

$ ls -lart /etc/test/scripts
total 20
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root   11 May 22 12:15 chmod-777.sh
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root   11 May 22 12:16 chmod-666.sh
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root   11 May 22 12:19 chmod-664.sh
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 22 13:00 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 22 13:00 .

Solution

To prevent world-writable files from making it into the packages, add the ability to override the default permissions of packaged files using a umask config option in the packaging spec file. This feature in nfpm would allow applying a global umask across any files being packaged, therefore, with the correct configuration, preventing world-writable files without needing to list permissions on each and every file in the package

Impact

Vulnerability is https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/276.html https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0#CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Anyone using nfpm for creating packages and not checking/setting file permissions before packaging could result in bad permissions for files/folders.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/goreleaser/nfpm/v2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.29.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/goreleaser/nfpm"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.1.0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "1.10.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-32698"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-276"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-05-24T17:30:16Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-05-30T04:15:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nWhen building packages directly from source control, file permissions on the checked-in files are not maintained. \n\n### Details\nWhen building packages directly from source control, file permissions on the checked-in files are not maintained. When nfpm packaged the files (without extra config for enforcing its own permissions) files could go out with bad permissions (chmod 666 or 777).\n\n### PoC\nCreate a default nfpm structure. \n\nWithin the test folder, create 3 files named `chmod-XXX.sh`. Each script has file \npermissions set corresponding with their file names (`chmod-777.sh` = `chmod 777`). Below each \nfile and permissions can be seen.\n\n```console\n$ ls -lart test \ntotal 24\n-rwxrwxrwx   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:15 chmod-777.sh\n-rw-rw-rw-   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:16 chmod-666.sh\ndrwxr-xr-x   5 user  group  160 May 19 13:19 .\n-rw-rw-r--   1 user  group   11 May 19 13:19 chmod-664.sh\ndrwxr-xr-x  10 user  group  320 May 19 13:29 ..\n```\n\nBelow is the snippet nfpm configuration file of the contents of the package. The test folder \nand files has no extra config for enforcing permissions. \n\n```yaml\ncontents:\n- src: foo-binary\n  dst: /usr/bin/bar\n- src: bar-config.conf\n  dst: /etc/foo-binary/bar-config.conf\n  type: config\n- src: test\n  dst: /etc/test/scripts\n```\n\nThe next step is to create a deb package.\n\n```console\n$ nfpm package -p deb # Create dep package\nusing deb packager...\ncreated package: foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb\n```\n\nWhen on a Ubuntu VM, install the foo package which was created\n\n```console\n$ sudo dpkg -i foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb # Installing deb package within Ubuntu\nSelecting previously unselected package foo.\n(Reading database ... 67540 files and directories currently installed.)\nPreparing to unpack foo_1.0.0_arm64.deb ...\nUnpacking foo (1.0.0) ...\nSetting up foo (1.0.0) ...\n```\n\nLooking at `/etc/test/scripts` and viewing the permissions. Permissions are passed exactly the same as the source.\n\n```console\n$ ls -lart /etc/test/scripts\ntotal 20\n-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root   11 May 22 12:15 chmod-777.sh\n-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root   11 May 22 12:16 chmod-666.sh\n-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root   11 May 22 12:19 chmod-664.sh\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 22 13:00 ..\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 22 13:00 .\n```\n\n\n## Solution\nTo prevent world-writable files from making it into the packages, add the ability to override the default permissions of packaged files using a umask config option in the packaging spec file. This feature in nfpm would allow applying a global umask across any files being packaged, therefore, with the correct configuration, preventing world-writable files without needing to list permissions on each and every file in the package\n\n\n### Impact\n\nVulnerability is https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/276.html\nhttps://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0#CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N\n\nAnyone using nfpm for creating packages and not checking/setting file permissions before packaging could result in bad permissions for files/folders.",
  "id": "GHSA-w7jw-q4fg-qc4c",
  "modified": "2024-05-20T21:52:23Z",
  "published": "2023-05-24T17:30:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goreleaser/nfpm/security/advisories/GHSA-w7jw-q4fg-qc4c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-32698"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goreleaser/nfpm/commit/ed9abdf63d5012cc884f2a83b4ab2b42b3680d30"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/goreleaser/nfpm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/goreleaser/nfpm/releases/tag/v2.29.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "nfpm has incorrect default permissions"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…