GHSA-W6QP-J494-G32C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-08 15:31 – Updated: 2026-05-14 21:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/vmalloc: prevent RCU stalls in kasan_release_vmalloc_node
When CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER is enabled, freeing KASAN shadow pages during vmalloc cleanup triggers expensive stack unwinding that acquires RCU read locks. Processing a large purge_list without rescheduling can cause the task to hold CPU for extended periods (10+ seconds), leading to RCU stalls and potential OOM conditions.
The issue manifests in purge_vmap_node() -> kasan_release_vmalloc_node() where iterating through hundreds or thousands of vmap_area entries and freeing their associated shadow pages causes:
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: rcu: Tasks blocked on level-0 rcu_node (CPUs 0-1): P6229/1:b..l ... task:kworker/0:17 state:R running task stack:28840 pid:6229 ... kasan_release_vmalloc_node+0x1ba/0xad0 mm/vmalloc.c:2299 purge_vmap_node+0x1ba/0xad0 mm/vmalloc.c:2299
Each call to kasan_release_vmalloc() can free many pages, and with page_owner tracking, each free triggers save_stack() which performs stack unwinding under RCU read lock. Without yielding, this creates an unbounded RCU critical section.
Add periodic cond_resched() calls within the loop to allow: - RCU grace periods to complete - Other tasks to run - Scheduler to preempt when needed
The fix uses need_resched() for immediate response under load, with a batch count of 32 as a guaranteed upper bound to prevent worst-case stalls even under light load.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43292"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-08T14:16:36Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/vmalloc: prevent RCU stalls in kasan_release_vmalloc_node\n\nWhen CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER is enabled, freeing KASAN shadow pages during\nvmalloc cleanup triggers expensive stack unwinding that acquires RCU read\nlocks. Processing a large purge_list without rescheduling can cause the\ntask to hold CPU for extended periods (10+ seconds), leading to RCU stalls\nand potential OOM conditions.\n\nThe issue manifests in purge_vmap_node() -\u003e kasan_release_vmalloc_node()\nwhere iterating through hundreds or thousands of vmap_area entries and\nfreeing their associated shadow pages causes:\n\n rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:\n rcu: Tasks blocked on level-0 rcu_node (CPUs 0-1): P6229/1:b..l\n ...\n task:kworker/0:17 state:R running task stack:28840 pid:6229\n ...\n kasan_release_vmalloc_node+0x1ba/0xad0 mm/vmalloc.c:2299\n purge_vmap_node+0x1ba/0xad0 mm/vmalloc.c:2299\n\nEach call to kasan_release_vmalloc() can free many pages, and with\npage_owner tracking, each free triggers save_stack() which performs stack\nunwinding under RCU read lock. Without yielding, this creates an\nunbounded RCU critical section.\n\nAdd periodic cond_resched() calls within the loop to allow:\n- RCU grace periods to complete\n- Other tasks to run\n- Scheduler to preempt when needed\n\nThe fix uses need_resched() for immediate response under load, with a\nbatch count of 32 as a guaranteed upper bound to prevent worst-case stalls\neven under light load.",
"id": "GHSA-w6qp-j494-g32c",
"modified": "2026-05-14T21:30:37Z",
"published": "2026-05-08T15:31:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43292"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1afe45f89d54b7183768ebbbbf14238ec187ab5c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2efa9c02c9b4c0d6866aa445f11056809b25ca28"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5747435e0fd474c24530ef1a6822f47e7d264b27"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b351fbe71091f7c8676c8ba597653d08b6719447"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.