GHSA-W3J4-76QW-WWJM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-09-07 23:08 – Updated: 2021-09-08 14:47
VLAI?
Summary
Older releases of better_errors open to Cross-Site Request Forgery attack
Details

Impact

better_errors prior to 2.8.0 did not implement CSRF protection for its internal requests. It also did not enforce the correct "Content-Type" header for these requests, which allowed a cross-origin "simple request" to be made without CORS protection. These together left an application with better_errors enabled open to cross-origin attacks.

As a developer tool, better_errors documentation strongly recommends addition only to the development bundle group, so this vulnerability should only affect development environments. Please ensure that your project limits better_errors to the development group (or the non-Rails equivalent).

Patches

Starting with release 2.8.x, CSRF protection is enforced. It is recommended that you upgrade to the latest release, or minimally to "~> 2.8.3".

Workarounds

There are no known workarounds to mitigate the risk of using older releases of better_errors.

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please - Add to the discussion in better_errors - Open an issue in better_errors

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
        "name": "better_errors"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.8.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39197"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2021-09-07T17:58:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-09-07T18:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nbetter_errors prior to 2.8.0 did not implement CSRF protection for its internal requests. It also did not enforce the correct \"Content-Type\" header for these requests, which allowed a cross-origin \"simple request\" to be made without CORS protection. These together left an application with better_errors enabled open to cross-origin attacks.\n\n_As a developer tool, better_errors documentation strongly recommends addition only to the `development` bundle group, so this vulnerability should only affect development environments. Please ensure that your project limits better_errors to the `development` group (or the non-Rails equivalent)._\n\n### Patches\nStarting with release 2.8.x, CSRF protection is enforced. It is recommended that you upgrade to the latest release, or minimally to \"~\u003e 2.8.3\".\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no known workarounds to mitigate the risk of using older releases of better_errors.\n\n### References\n- Chris Moberly provided [an example attack that uses a now-patched vulnerability of webpack-dev-server in conjunction with Better Errors](https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/09/07/why-are-developers-vulnerable-to-driveby-attacks/)\n\n### For more information\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please\n- Add to the [discussion in better_errors](https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors/discussions/507)\n- Open an issue in [better_errors](https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors)\n",
  "id": "GHSA-w3j4-76qw-wwjm",
  "modified": "2021-09-08T14:47:05Z",
  "published": "2021-09-07T23:08:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors/security/advisories/GHSA-w3j4-76qw-wwjm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors/pull/474"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors/commit/8e8e796bfbde4aa088741823c8a3fc6df2089bb0"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/BetterErrors/better_errors/discussions/507"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/better_errors/CVE-2021-39197.yml"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Older releases of better_errors open to Cross-Site Request Forgery attack"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…