{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.13.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/gittuf/gittuf"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.14.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-44544"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-639"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T03:34:13Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-14T18:16:50Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nAn attacker with push access to gittuf\u0027s Reference State Log (RSL) can roll back the current policy to any previous policy trusted by the current set of root keys.\n\n## Impact\n\ngittuf determines the policy to load by inspecting the RSL. Except for the very first policy (which is automatically trusted given gittuf\u0027s TOFU model, or verified against manually specified keys), whenever an RSL entry that points to a new policy is encountered, gittuf validates that this policy is trusted. This is done by checking that the new policy\u2019s root metadata is signed by the required threshold of the current policy\u0027s root keys.\n\nBecause of this, an attacker with push access to the RSL may create a new entry that references an old policy (that is trusted by the most recent policy\u0027s set of root keys), thereby rolling back gittuf\u0027s policy to the attacker\u0027s chosen state.\n\nNote that the attacker cannot roll back the policy to one that would no longer be trusted by the most recent policy\u0027s root keys. As an example, say that Policy A\u0027s root keys were for Alice and Bob with a threshold of two, and then Policy B replaced Bob with Carol, with a threshold of two required. An attacker would not be able to roll back the policy to policy A, because it was signed by Alice and Bob, not Alice and Carol.\n\nIf you host your repository on a forge such as GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, etc., and only certain people are allowed to push to the RSL (e.g. only maintainers of your project have push access to the repository, and all other contributions must be done via pull request), then only those users with push access can perform the attack, or the forge itself.\n\n## Fix\n\ngittuf version v0.14.0 introduces a monotonically increasing number to all policy metadata (not to be confused with the metadata version, which dictates the features supported by the metadata). This number is incremented whenever a gittuf client of version v0.14.0 or greater updates the metadata or invokes a patch command to add this field.\n\nDuring policy verification, gittuf compares the monotonically increasing number of the new policy it encounters in the RSL to the current policy. If any file in the policy (e.g. root of trust, primary policy file, or delegated policy file) has this number, gittuf will check that it increases by one any time the respective file is changed.\n\n## Resolution\n\n### Upgrade gittuf and Apply Metadata Patch\n\ngittuf strongly recommends users upgrade to the latest version to remediate this vulnerability. Specifically, gittuf version v0.14.0 (and above) are patched with respect to this vulnerability. All users who use gittuf to verify the repository or update its policy metadata must upgrade to prevent this attack.\n\nAfter a consuming application applies the upgrade, a root of trust user or policy administrator must run:\n\n```\ngittuf trust increment-version\n```\n\nor:\n```\ngittuf policy increment-version\n```\n\nto add the monotonically increasing number field to the metadata (see [Fix](#fix) above).\n\n### Check for Rollback Attack Attempts\n\nBecause this attack requires the attacker to add an entry to the RSL, and because gittuf stores the RSL inside the repository, this attack cannot be performed without leaving evidence behind (in this case, the malicious RSL entry). To check for whether this attack was performed on your repository, run:\n\n```\ngittuf rsl log --ref refs/gittuf/policy\n```\n\nAll RSL entries that record new policy states for gittuf should be displayed. There should be one RSL entry every time a legitimate, new policy was applied. Should users find an RSL entry which points to an older policy state, their repository has been compromised.\n\n## Credits\n\ngittuf thanks Andrew Nesbitt (@andrew) for finding and responsibly disclosing this vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-vxvc-cg7j-rwqj",
  "modified": "2026-05-14T20:54:36Z",
  "published": "2026-05-07T03:34:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gittuf/gittuf/security/advisories/GHSA-vxvc-cg7j-rwqj"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44544"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/gittuf/gittuf/commit/dd76efa505f9137a4a9a625c5ac67b333365a1b8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/gittuf/gittuf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "gittuf\u0027s policy can be rolled back to prior valid versions"
}