GHSA-VXF2-FQVQ-W7P7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:58 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:58
VLAI?
Details

Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the MojoBlog component RC 0.15 for Joomla! allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter to (1) wp-comments-post.php and (2) wp-trackback.php.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-4789"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-04-21T14:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in the MojoBlog component RC 0.15 for Joomla! allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter to (1) wp-comments-post.php and (2) wp-trackback.php.",
  "id": "GHSA-vxf2-fqvq-w7p7",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:58:15Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:58:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4789"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/0912-exploits/joomlamojoblog-rfi.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37179"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…