GHSA-VMCP-66R5-3PCP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-17 16:00 – Updated: 2024-07-17 19:13
VLAI
Summary
Steeltoe Leaks Basic Auth Credentials to Logs After Fetch Registry Error
Details

Summary

When utilizing multiple Eureka server service URLs with basic auth and encountering an issue with fetching the service registry, an error is logged with the Eureka server service URLs but only the first URL is masked.

Details

Package: Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka Package version: 3.2.1 Branch: "release/3.2" File name: DiscoveryClient.cs Line number: 325 Code in question: _logger.LogError(e, "FetchRegistry Failed for Eureka service urls: {EurekaServerServiceUrls}", new Uri(ClientConfig.EurekaServerServiceUrls).ToMaskedString());

Error message in logs: FetchRegistry Failed for Eureka service urls: https://****:****@eureka1.com:443/eureka,https://user:password@eureka2.com:443/eureka

I thought new Uri(clientOptions.EurekaServerServiceUrls) would throw a UriFormatException since there are multiple URLs but my logs are showing two URLs regardless.

PoC

  1. Set Eureka config with multiple server URLs with basic auth
  2. Apologies for not being more descriptive for this step, but I believe we would just need to trigger an exception in FetchFullRegistryAsync.
  3. Check the logs and should see the error

Impact

Vulnerability: Credential leakage in the logs Who does it impact?: Users who are using peer awareness with Spring Eureka

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.2.7"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.2.8"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Steeltoe.Discovery.EurekaBase"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2.5.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c 3.0.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Steeltoe.Discovery.ClientCore"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Steeltoe.Discovery.ClientAutofac"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2.5.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-40636"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-532"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-07-17T16:00:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-17T18:15:04Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nWhen utilizing multiple Eureka server service URLs with basic auth and encountering an issue with fetching the service registry, an error is logged with the Eureka server service URLs but only the first URL is masked.\n\n### Details\nPackage: Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka\nPackage version: 3.2.1\nBranch: \"release/3.2\"\nFile name: `DiscoveryClient.cs`\nLine number: 325\nCode in question:  `_logger.LogError(e, \"FetchRegistry Failed for Eureka service urls: {EurekaServerServiceUrls}\", new Uri(ClientConfig.EurekaServerServiceUrls).ToMaskedString());`\n\n\nError message in logs: `FetchRegistry Failed for Eureka service urls: https://****:****@eureka1.com:443/eureka,https://user:password@eureka2.com:443/eureka`\n\nI thought `new Uri(clientOptions.EurekaServerServiceUrls)` would throw a `UriFormatException` since there are multiple URLs but my logs are showing two URLs regardless.\n\n### PoC\n1. Set Eureka config with multiple server URLs with basic auth\n2. Apologies for not being more descriptive for this step, but I believe we would just need to trigger an exception in `FetchFullRegistryAsync`.\n3. Check the logs and should see the error \n\n### Impact\nVulnerability: Credential leakage in the logs\nWho does it impact?: Users who are using peer awareness with Spring Eureka",
  "id": "GHSA-vmcp-66r5-3pcp",
  "modified": "2024-07-17T19:13:43Z",
  "published": "2024-07-17T16:00:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-vmcp-66r5-3pcp"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-40636"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/commit/c5d4a94e90ccb77f8e851bc681a2e348a95e7ecb"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Steeltoe Leaks Basic Auth Credentials to Logs After Fetch Registry Error"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.