GHSA-VHF3-65MF-C545
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:56 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:56
VLAI?
Details
Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files.
Severity ?
5.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7502"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-04-11T21:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Red Hat CloudForms 3.2 Management Engine (CFME) 5.4.4 and CloudForms 4.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.5.0 do not properly encrypt data in the backend PostgreSQL database, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive data and consequently gain privileges by leveraging access to (1) database exports or (2) log files.",
"id": "GHSA-vhf3-65mf-c545",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:56:55Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:56:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2551"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015:2620"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7502"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283019"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2620.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…