GHSA-VCMV-6VCP-286Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-23 21:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: ipv4: fix ARM64 alignment fault in multipath hash seed

struct sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed contains two u32 fields (user_seed and mp_seed), making it an 8-byte structure with a 4-byte alignment requirement.

In fib_multipath_hash_from_keys(), the code evaluates the entire struct atomically via READ_ONCE():

mp_seed = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed).mp_seed;

While this silently works on GCC by falling back to unaligned regular loads which the ARM64 kernel tolerates, it causes a fatal kernel panic when compiled with Clang and LTO enabled.

Commit e35123d83ee3 ("arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire when CONFIG_LTO=y") strengthens READ_ONCE() to use Load-Acquire instructions (ldar / ldapr) to prevent compiler reordering bugs under Clang LTO. Since the macro evaluates the full 8-byte struct, Clang emits a 64-bit ldar instruction. ARM64 architecture strictly requires ldar to be naturally aligned, thus executing it on a 4-byte aligned address triggers a strict Alignment Fault (FSC = 0x21).

Fix the read side by moving the READ_ONCE() directly to the u32 member, which emits a safe 32-bit ldar Wn.

Furthermore, Eric Dumazet pointed out that WRITE_ONCE() on the entire struct in proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed() is also flawed. Analysis shows that Clang splits this 8-byte write into two separate 32-bit str instructions. While this avoids an alignment fault, it destroys atomicity and exposes a tear-write vulnerability. Fix this by explicitly splitting the write into two 32-bit WRITE_ONCE() operations.

Finally, add the missing READ_ONCE() when reading user_seed in proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed() to ensure proper pairing and concurrency safety.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23316"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T11:16:28Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ipv4: fix ARM64 alignment fault in multipath hash seed\n\n`struct sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed` contains two u32 fields\n(user_seed and mp_seed), making it an 8-byte structure with a 4-byte\nalignment requirement.\n\nIn `fib_multipath_hash_from_keys()`, the code evaluates the entire\nstruct atomically via `READ_ONCE()`:\n\n    mp_seed = READ_ONCE(net-\u003eipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed).mp_seed;\n\nWhile this silently works on GCC by falling back to unaligned regular\nloads which the ARM64 kernel tolerates, it causes a fatal kernel panic\nwhen compiled with Clang and LTO enabled.\n\nCommit e35123d83ee3 (\"arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire\nwhen CONFIG_LTO=y\") strengthens `READ_ONCE()` to use Load-Acquire\ninstructions (`ldar` / `ldapr`) to prevent compiler reordering bugs\nunder Clang LTO. Since the macro evaluates the full 8-byte struct,\nClang emits a 64-bit `ldar` instruction. ARM64 architecture strictly\nrequires `ldar` to be naturally aligned, thus executing it on a 4-byte\naligned address triggers a strict Alignment Fault (FSC = 0x21).\n\nFix the read side by moving the `READ_ONCE()` directly to the `u32`\nmember, which emits a safe 32-bit `ldar Wn`.\n\nFurthermore, Eric Dumazet pointed out that `WRITE_ONCE()` on the entire\nstruct in `proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed()` is also flawed. Analysis\nshows that Clang splits this 8-byte write into two separate 32-bit\n`str` instructions. While this avoids an alignment fault, it destroys\natomicity and exposes a tear-write vulnerability. Fix this by\nexplicitly splitting the write into two 32-bit `WRITE_ONCE()`\noperations.\n\nFinally, add the missing `READ_ONCE()` when reading `user_seed` in\n`proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed()` to ensure proper pairing and\nconcurrency safety.",
  "id": "GHSA-vcmv-6vcp-286q",
  "modified": "2026-04-23T21:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-03-25T12:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23316"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bdc94d45d5459f0149085dfc1efe733c8e14f11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ee7fa6cf78ff26d783d39e2949d14c4c1cd5e7f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/607e923a3c1b2120de430b3dcde25ed8ad213c0a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e4ad34a8889a6a9e0f6cc7c55d02161fe31a199"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…