GHSA-VC3M-HCQ5-8VHR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 18:33 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:31
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Reset register ID for BPF_END value tracking

When a register undergoes a BPF_END (byte swap) operation, its scalar value is mutated in-place. If this register previously shared a scalar ID with another register (e.g., after an r1 = r0 assignment), this tie must be broken.

Currently, the verifier misses resetting dst_reg->id to 0 for BPF_END. Consequently, if a conditional jump checks the swapped register, the verifier incorrectly propagates the learned bounds to the linked register, leading to false confidence in the linked register's value and potentially allowing out-of-bounds memory accesses.

Fix this by explicitly resetting dst_reg->id to 0 in the BPF_END case to break the scalar tie, similar to how BPF_NEG handles it via __mark_reg_known.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43070"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-05T16:16:16Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Reset register ID for BPF_END value tracking\n\nWhen a register undergoes a BPF_END (byte swap) operation, its scalar\nvalue is mutated in-place. If this register previously shared a scalar ID\nwith another register (e.g., after an `r1 = r0` assignment), this tie must\nbe broken.\n\nCurrently, the verifier misses resetting `dst_reg-\u003eid` to 0 for BPF_END.\nConsequently, if a conditional jump checks the swapped register, the\nverifier incorrectly propagates the learned bounds to the linked register,\nleading to false confidence in the linked register\u0027s value and potentially\nallowing out-of-bounds memory accesses.\n\nFix this by explicitly resetting `dst_reg-\u003eid` to 0 in the BPF_END case\nto break the scalar tie, similar to how BPF_NEG handles it via\n`__mark_reg_known`.",
  "id": "GHSA-vc3m-hcq5-8vhr",
  "modified": "2026-05-08T15:31:15Z",
  "published": "2026-05-05T18:33:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43070"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d15c3611a2cc5d08993545d4032055ae10ae2c1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a17443af874229408ce6b78e2c8a2b5adeb4b7d8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3125bc01884431d30d731461634c8295b6f0529"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…