GHSA-V76Q-G5WV-JJW6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ocfs2: fix out-of-bounds write in ocfs2_write_end_inline
KASAN reports a use-after-free write of 4086 bytes in ocfs2_write_end_inline, called from ocfs2_write_end_nolock during a copy_file_range splice fallback on a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem mounted on a loop device. The actual bug is an out-of-bounds write past the inode block buffer, not a true use-after-free. The write overflows into an adjacent freed page, which KASAN reports as UAF.
The root cause is that ocfs2_try_to_write_inline_data trusts the on-disk id_count field to determine whether a write fits in inline data. On a corrupted filesystem, id_count can exceed the physical maximum inline data capacity, causing writes to overflow the inode block buffer.
Call trace (crash path):
vfs_copy_file_range (fs/read_write.c:1634) do_splice_direct splice_direct_to_actor iter_file_splice_write ocfs2_file_write_iter generic_perform_write ocfs2_write_end ocfs2_write_end_nolock (fs/ocfs2/aops.c:1949) ocfs2_write_end_inline (fs/ocfs2/aops.c:1915) memcpy_from_folio <-- KASAN: write OOB
So add id_count upper bound check in ocfs2_validate_inode_block() to alongside the existing i_size check to fix it.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-43075"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-787"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-05-06T10:16:20Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nocfs2: fix out-of-bounds write in ocfs2_write_end_inline\n\nKASAN reports a use-after-free write of 4086 bytes in\nocfs2_write_end_inline, called from ocfs2_write_end_nolock during a\ncopy_file_range splice fallback on a corrupted ocfs2 filesystem mounted on\na loop device. The actual bug is an out-of-bounds write past the inode\nblock buffer, not a true use-after-free. The write overflows into an\nadjacent freed page, which KASAN reports as UAF.\n\nThe root cause is that ocfs2_try_to_write_inline_data trusts the on-disk\nid_count field to determine whether a write fits in inline data. On a\ncorrupted filesystem, id_count can exceed the physical maximum inline data\ncapacity, causing writes to overflow the inode block buffer.\n\nCall trace (crash path):\n\n vfs_copy_file_range (fs/read_write.c:1634)\n do_splice_direct\n splice_direct_to_actor\n iter_file_splice_write\n ocfs2_file_write_iter\n generic_perform_write\n ocfs2_write_end\n ocfs2_write_end_nolock (fs/ocfs2/aops.c:1949)\n ocfs2_write_end_inline (fs/ocfs2/aops.c:1915)\n memcpy_from_folio \u003c-- KASAN: write OOB\n\nSo add id_count upper bound check in ocfs2_validate_inode_block() to\nalongside the existing i_size check to fix it.",
"id": "GHSA-v76q-g5wv-jjw6",
"modified": "2026-05-08T15:31:15Z",
"published": "2026-05-06T12:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43075"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c1af902223b6fcedb60904ca0b551254686c7b9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69d3c69ade1e4285ab4ca48fe7acee0767e65604"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bc5da4842bed3252d26e742213741a4d0ac1b14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/947f953978b0d9463498d548d0f054f5a75be2e9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2c9dc6b6e96f3585f2a1062ca3374a52db0938f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.