GHSA-V5V4-W2J4-RP8P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:51 – Updated: 2023-01-19 18:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel before 4.9.6, there is an off by one in the drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c cqspi_setup_flash() function. There are CQSPI_MAX_CHIPSELECT elements in the ->f_pdata array so the ">" should be ">=" instead.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-10764"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-27T22:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel before 4.9.6, there is an off by one in the drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c cqspi_setup_flash() function. There are CQSPI_MAX_CHIPSELECT elements in the -\u003ef_pdata array so the \"\u003e\" should be \"\u003e=\" instead.",
"id": "GHSA-v5v4-w2j4-rp8p",
"modified": "2023-01-19T18:30:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:51:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-10764"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/193e87143c290ec16838f5368adc0e0bc94eb931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=193e87143c290ec16838f5368adc0e0bc94eb931"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.9.6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K24444495"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K24444495?utm_source=f5support\u0026amp;utm_medium=RSS"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…