GHSA-RM2P-J3R7-4X4J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 19:50 – Updated: 2026-03-30 13:45
VLAI?
Summary
OpenClaw's Slack reaction/pin sender-policy consistency issue in non-message ingress
Details
Summary
OpenClaw Slack monitor handled reaction_* and pin_* non-message events before applying sender-policy checks consistently.
In affected versions, these events could be added to system-event context even when sender policy would not normally allow them.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package: npm
openclaw - Latest published affected version confirmed:
2026.2.24(npm latest as of February 26, 2026) - Affected range:
<= 2026.2.24 - Patched version :
2026.2.25
Technical Details
reaction_*andpin_*handlers now route through shared sender authorization (authorizeSlackSystemEventSender).- Enforced checks now include:
- DM
dmPolicy/allowFrom - channel
usersallowlist enforcement for non-DM channels - channel-level allow checks before system-event enqueue
- Regression coverage added for DM allow/deny and channel-user allowlist deny paths.
Fix Commit(s)
aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e75dfb71e4e8b7c2feba5a8ca662f92ea840e0147
Impact
Low-severity policy-consistency issue in Slack non-message event ingress. This may introduce unexpected reaction/pin context signals from senders outside configured policy.
Release Process Note
patched_versions is pre-set to planned release 2026.2.25. Advisory published with npm release 2026.2.25.
OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.2.24"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.25"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32899"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T19:50:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nOpenClaw Slack monitor handled `reaction_*` and `pin_*` non-message events before applying sender-policy checks consistently.\n\nIn affected versions, these events could be added to system-event context even when sender policy would not normally allow them.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: npm `openclaw`\n- Latest published affected version confirmed: `2026.2.24` (npm latest as of February 26, 2026)\n- Affected range: `\u003c= 2026.2.24`\n- Patched version : `2026.2.25`\n\n### Technical Details\n- `reaction_*` and `pin_*` handlers now route through shared sender authorization (`authorizeSlackSystemEventSender`).\n- Enforced checks now include:\n - DM `dmPolicy` / `allowFrom`\n - channel `users` allowlist enforcement for non-DM channels\n - channel-level allow checks before system-event enqueue\n- Regression coverage added for DM allow/deny and channel-user allowlist deny paths.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e`\n- `75dfb71e4e8b7c2feba5a8ca662f92ea840e0147`\n\n### Impact\nLow-severity policy-consistency issue in Slack non-message event ingress.\nThis may introduce unexpected reaction/pin context signals from senders outside configured policy.\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to planned release `2026.2.25`. Advisory published with npm release `2026.2.25`.\n\nOpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-rm2p-j3r7-4x4j",
"modified": "2026-03-30T13:45:13Z",
"published": "2026-03-03T19:50:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-rm2p-j3r7-4x4j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32899"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/75dfb71e4e8b7c2feba5a8ca662f92ea840e0147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-sender-policy-bypass-in-slack-reaction-and-pin-event-handlers"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s Slack reaction/pin sender-policy consistency issue in non-message ingress"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…