GHSA-RHH5-9H8G-3CXM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:50 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:50
VLAI?
Details

Heap-based buffer overflow in IrfanView before 4.32 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted "Rows Per Strip" and "Samples Per Pixel" values in a TIFF image file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-5233"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-10-25T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in IrfanView before 4.32 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted \"Rows Per Strip\" and \"Samples Per Pixel\" values in a TIFF image file.",
  "id": "GHSA-rhh5-9h8g-3cxm",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:50:23Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:50:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-5233"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47065"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18257"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.irfanview.com/history_old.htm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/77957"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.protekresearchlab.com/index.php?option=com_content\u0026view=article\u0026id=30\u0026Itemid=30"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…