GHSA-RHFG-J8JQ-7V2H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-29 15:48 – Updated: 2026-04-10 20:19
VLAI?
Summary
OpenClaw: SSRF via Unguarded Configured Base URLs in Multiple Channel Extensions (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-28476)
Details
Summary
SSRF via Unguarded Configured Base URLs in Multiple Channel Extensions (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-28476)
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw - Affected versions:
<= 2026.3.24 - First patched version:
2026.3.25 - Latest published npm version at verification time:
2026.3.24
Details
Several channel extensions still used raw fetch() against configured base URLs without the SSRF guard that was added for CVE-2026-28476. Commit f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf routes those outbound requests through fetchWithSsrFGuard so configured endpoints cannot be rebound to blocked internal destinations.
Verified vulnerable on tag v2026.3.24 and fixed on main by commit f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf.
Fix Commit(s)
f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.3.28"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-35629"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-29T15:48:42Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nSSRF via Unguarded Configured Base URLs in Multiple Channel Extensions (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-28476)\n\n## Affected Packages / Versions\n\n- Package: `openclaw`\n- Affected versions: `\u003c= 2026.3.24`\n- First patched version: `2026.3.25`\n- Latest published npm version at verification time: `2026.3.24`\n\n## Details\n\nSeveral channel extensions still used raw `fetch()` against configured base URLs without the SSRF guard that was added for CVE-2026-28476. Commit `f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf` routes those outbound requests through `fetchWithSsrFGuard` so configured endpoints cannot be rebound to blocked internal destinations.\n\nVerified vulnerable on tag `v2026.3.24` and fixed on `main` by commit `f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf`.\n\n## Fix Commit(s)\n\n- `f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf`",
"id": "GHSA-rhfg-j8jq-7v2h",
"modified": "2026-04-10T20:19:25Z",
"published": "2026-03-29T15:48:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-rhfg-j8jq-7v2h"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35629"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/f92c92515bd439a71bd03eb1bc969c1964f17acf"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pg2v-8xwh-qhcc"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-server-side-request-forgery-via-unguarded-configured-base-urls-in-channel-extensions"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "OpenClaw: SSRF via Unguarded Configured Base URLs in Multiple Channel Extensions (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-28476)"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…