GHSA-R8FV-8GWF-V44C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:54 – Updated: 2022-05-01 06:54
VLAI?
Details
fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is "not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-1902"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-04-20T10:02:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "fold_binary in fold-const.c in GNU Compiler Collection (gcc) 4.1 improperly handles pointer overflow when folding a certain expr comparison to a corresponding offset comparison in cases other than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR, which might introduce buffer overflow vulnerabilities into applications that could be exploited by context-dependent attackers.NOTE: the vendor states that the essence of the issue is \"not correctly interpreting an offset to a pointer as a signed value.\"",
"id": "GHSA-r8fv-8gwf-v44c",
"modified": "2022-05-01T06:54:03Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T06:54:03Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1902"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356896"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26763"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01297.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-04/msg01298.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fold-const.c?r1=110549\u0026r2=112698\u0026pathrev=112698\u0026diff_format=h"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431184/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431245/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431297/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/431319/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…