GHSA-R6GW-XG73-F977
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:07 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:07
VLAI?
Details
Gummi 0.6.5 allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary dot file that uses the name of an existing file and a (1) .aux, (2) .log, (3) .out, (4) .pdf, or (5) .toc extension for the file name, as demonstrated by .thesis.tex.aux.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-7758"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-59"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-01-08T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Gummi 0.6.5 allows local users to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary dot file that uses the name of an existing file and a (1) .aux, (2) .log, (3) .out, (4) .pdf, or (5) .toc extension for the file name, as demonstrated by .thesis.tex.aux.",
"id": "GHSA-r6gw-xg73-f977",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:07:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:07:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7758"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756432"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178582.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-March/178642.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00117.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00150.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/08/4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/08/5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…