GHSA-QP7H-F5XX-WVCG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:21 – Updated: 2022-05-02 06:21
VLAI?
Details

Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Tembria Server Monitor before 5.6.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) GET, (2) PUT, or (3) HEAD request, as demonstrated by a malformed GET request containing a long PATH_INFO to index.asp.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-1316"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-04-14T16:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Tembria Server Monitor before 5.6.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) GET, (2) PUT, or (3) HEAD request, as demonstrated by a malformed GET request containing a long PATH_INFO to index.asp.",
  "id": "GHSA-qp7h-f5xx-wvcg",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T06:21:31Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T06:21:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1316"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39270"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/advisories.php?id=CORELAN-10-022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.corelan.be:8800/wp-content/forum-file-uploads/admin1/exploits/corelan_lincoln_tembria.py_.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…