GHSA-QHHG-X68M-7RH6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:19 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:19
VLAI?
Details

Webbler CMS before 3.1.6 does not properly restrict use of "mail a friend" forms, which allows remote attackers to send arbitrary amounts of forged e-mail. NOTE: this could be leveraged for spam or phishing attacks.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-4073"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-07-30T17:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Webbler CMS before 3.1.6 does not properly restrict use of \"mail a friend\" forms, which allows remote attackers to send arbitrary amounts of forged e-mail.  NOTE: this could be leveraged for spam or phishing attacks.",
  "id": "GHSA-qhhg-x68m-7rh6",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T18:19:57Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T18:19:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4073"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/38994"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2955"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tincan.co.uk/?lid=1975"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.procheckup.com/Vulner_2007.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/474521/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…